You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Mohammad Nour El-Din <no...@gmail.com> on 2006/12/28 06:08:50 UTC
JIRA OPENEJB-240 Reopen
Hi DBlevins...
Regarding Raj's mail
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-development&m=116721559121061&w=2 ,
I have found that there is a missing functionality related to this JIRA so I
reopened it instead of opening a new one
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-cvs&m=116728222822617&w=2
--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
Re: JIRA OPENEJB-240 Reopen
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Dec 27, 2006, at 10:10 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2006, at 9:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 27, 2006, at 9:26 PM, Raj Saini wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mohammad,
>>>
>>> Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
>>>> Hi DBlevins...
>>>>
>>>> Regarding Raj's mail
>>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-
>>>> development&m=116721559121061&w=2 ,
>>>> I have found that there is a missing functionality related to
>>>> this JIRA so I
>>>> reopened it instead of opening a new one
>>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-cvs&m=116728222822617&w=2
>>> I was going to create a new one. I will not do it now.
>>
>> Great. See my other email and let me know what the issue is.
>
> Ok I see. @Local or @Remote is allowed to be used on the bean
> class with no corresponding interface class name provided these
> conditions are met:
>
> - The bean has exactly one business interface
> - That business interface is not annotated contrarily (@Remote on
> the bean while interfaces is annotated @Local, and vice versa)
>
> As this affects @Local too I'll reopen that issue as well.
Fixed!
-David
Re: JIRA OPENEJB-240 Reopen
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Dec 27, 2006, at 9:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2006, at 9:26 PM, Raj Saini wrote:
>
>> Hi Mohammad,
>>
>> Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
>>> Hi DBlevins...
>>>
>>> Regarding Raj's mail
>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-
>>> development&m=116721559121061&w=2 ,
>>> I have found that there is a missing functionality related to
>>> this JIRA so I
>>> reopened it instead of opening a new one
>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-cvs&m=116728222822617&w=2
>> I was going to create a new one. I will not do it now.
>
> Great. See my other email and let me know what the issue is.
Ok I see. @Local or @Remote is allowed to be used on the bean class
with no corresponding interface class name provided these conditions
are met:
- The bean has exactly one business interface
- That business interface is not annotated contrarily (@Remote on
the bean while interfaces is annotated @Local, and vice versa)
As this affects @Local too I'll reopen that issue as well.
-David
Re: JIRA OPENEJB-240 Reopen
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Dec 27, 2006, at 9:26 PM, Raj Saini wrote:
> Hi Mohammad,
>
> Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
>> Hi DBlevins...
>>
>> Regarding Raj's mail
>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-
>> development&m=116721559121061&w=2 ,
>> I have found that there is a missing functionality related to this
>> JIRA so I
>> reopened it instead of opening a new one
>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-cvs&m=116728222822617&w=2
> I was going to create a new one. I will not do it now.
Great. See my other email and let me know what the issue is.
-David
Re: JIRA OPENEJB-240 Reopen
Posted by Raj Saini <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mohammad,
Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi DBlevins...
>
> Regarding Raj's mail
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-development&m=116721559121061&w=2
> ,
> I have found that there is a missing functionality related to this
> JIRA so I
> reopened it instead of opening a new one
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openejb-cvs&m=116728222822617&w=2
I was going to create a new one. I will not do it now.
Thanks,
Raj