You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bval.apache.org by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org> on 2012/07/28 22:53:20 UTC
[vote] project logo
hi @ all,
please have a look at [1] and vote.
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo
[ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo
[ ] -1 i don't like it and we should keep the current logo (for now)
------------------------------------------------.
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://s.apache.org/ya
Re: [vote] project logo
Posted by Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com>.
+1
looks very professional.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>wrote:
> hi @ all,
>
> please have a look at [1] and vote.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo
> [ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo
> [ ] -1 i don't like it and we should keep the current logo (for now)
> ------------------------------------------------.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/ya
>
--
Albert Lee.
Re: [vote] project logo
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
+1
I like it
david jencks
On Jul 28, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
> hi @ all,
>
> please have a look at [1] and vote.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo
> [ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo
> [ ] -1 i don't like it and we should keep the current logo (for now)
> ------------------------------------------------.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/ya
Re: [vote] project logo
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
+1 very well done!!!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org> wrote:
>> hi @ all,
>>
>> please have a look at [1] and vote.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo
>> [ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo
>> [ ] -1 i don't like it and we should keep the current logo (for now)
>> ------------------------------------------------.
>
> +1 (it's indisputably better than the current logo, and we should use
> it unless/until anyone improves upon it!)
>
> Thanks again for getting this moving, GP!
>
> Matt
>
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>> [1] http://s.apache.org/ya
Re: [vote] project logo
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
+1
--kevan
On Jul 28, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org> wrote:
>> hi @ all,
>>
>> please have a look at [1] and vote.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo
>> [ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo
>> [ ] -1 i don't like it and we should keep the current logo (for now)
>> ------------------------------------------------.
>
> +1 (it's indisputably better than the current logo, and we should use
> it unless/until anyone improves upon it!)
>
> Thanks again for getting this moving, GP!
>
> Matt
>
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>> [1] http://s.apache.org/ya
Re: [vote] project logo
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org> wrote:
> hi @ all,
>
> please have a look at [1] and vote.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo
> [ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo
> [ ] -1 i don't like it and we should keep the current logo (for now)
> ------------------------------------------------.
+1 (it's indisputably better than the current logo, and we should use
it unless/until anyone improves upon it!)
Thanks again for getting this moving, GP!
Matt
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/ya
Re: [vote] project logo
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
2012/7/30 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> dumdidum, 2nd time, now in the correct thread ;)
>
> +1 for the logo as it is much better than the current one.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Roman Stumm <ro...@gmx.de>
> > To: dev@bval.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 9:06 AM
> > Subject: Re: [vote] project logo
> >
> > Am 28.07.12 22:53, schrieb Gerhard Petracek:
> >> hi @ all,
> >>
> >> please have a look at [1] and vote.
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------
> >> [ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo
> >> [ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo
> >> [ ] -1 i don't like it and we should keep the current logo (for now)
> >> ------------------------------------------------.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> gerhard
> >>
> >> [1] http://s.apache.org/ya
> >>
> > +1 , yes looks sympathic and fresh!
> >
>
Re: [vote] project logo
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
dumdidum, 2nd time, now in the correct thread ;)
+1 for the logo as it is much better than the current one.
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Roman Stumm <ro...@gmx.de>
> To: dev@bval.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 9:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [vote] project logo
>
> Am 28.07.12 22:53, schrieb Gerhard Petracek:
>> hi @ all,
>>
>> please have a look at [1] and vote.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo
>> [ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo
>> [ ] -1 i don't like it and we should keep the current logo (for now)
>> ------------------------------------------------.
>>
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>> [1] http://s.apache.org/ya
>>
> +1 , yes looks sympathic and fresh!
>
Re: [vote] project logo
Posted by Roman Stumm <ro...@gmx.de>.
Am 28.07.12 22:53, schrieb Gerhard Petracek:
> hi @ all,
>
> please have a look at [1] and vote.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo
> [ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo
> [ ] -1 i don't like it and we should keep the current logo (for now)
> ------------------------------------------------.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/ya
>
+1 , yes looks sympathic and fresh!