RE: svn commit: r516704 - in /james/server/trunk: ./ pheonix-deployment/ pheonix-deployment/lib/ pheonix-deployment/tools/lib/ stage/ stage/activation/ stage/activation/jars/ stage/avalon-framework/ stage/avalon-framework/jars/ stage/avalon-logkit/ stage/

["Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>]

> As requested, maven standard layout adopted for this directory.

By whom?  We are not a maven project, except for the web site, which is only because the only person who had time to do the work refused to use Ant, which is the project standard.  Maven should be gradually removed as we can take advantage of recent Ant enhancements.

	--- Noel



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r516704 - in /james/server/trunk: ./ pheonix-deployment/ pheonix-deployment/lib/ pheonix-deployment/tools/lib/ stage/ stage/activation/ stage/activation/jars/ stage/avalon-framework/ stage/avalon-framework/jars/ stage/avalon-logkit/ stage/

[Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>]

Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
>> As requested, maven standard layout adopted for this directory.
> 
> By whom?  We are not a maven project, except for the web site, which is only because the only person who had time to do the work refused to use Ant, which is the project standard.  Maven should be gradually removed as we can take advantage of recent Ant enhancements.
> 
> 	--- Noel

By me: there is a thread where Robert proposed a structure. Feel free to 
  lookup the [PROPOSAL] threads from the last few months.

I asked to follow a specific structure (that is SDL) that was compliant 
with what he was proposing and I liked it much more.
He asked if anyone was against this 1 month ago and no one said 
anything, so I think (we thought) there was lazy consensus.

Btw I don't have big concern with this: I proposed to use SDL because it 
make sense to me and this would simplify my work to keep the website 
updated. Of course if anyone else will take care to rewrite the website 
stuff with ant or to keep updated maven I've no problem at all.

To put it simple I'm +1 to SDL (Standard Directory Layout) as described 
here:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html

I am not against any other solution.

Stefano


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org