You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@continuum.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2008/01/05 03:00:52 UTC
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we need
to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/
committers, and a chair.
I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
there any other nominations?
I have the current committers list as:
Maria Odea Ching
Joakim Erdfelt
Olivier Lamy
Trygve Laugstol
Jesse McConnell
Brett Porter
Edwin Punzalan
Carlos Sanchez
Wendy Smoak
Rahul Thakur
Emmanuel Venisse
Kenney Westerhof
Andrew Williams
Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer? Did
I miss anyone?
The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
emeritus:
Herve Boutemy
Dan Diephouse
Fabrizio Giustina
Arnaud Heritier
Lukas Theussl
Jason van Zyl
Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
Cheers,
Brett
On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> So, what's next?
>
> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
> started on it?
>
> From past experience the steps would be:
> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
> participating in the TLP
> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
>
> The board next meets in mid-January.
>
> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
>
> - Brett
>
> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>
>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>>
>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance
>>> to grow.
>>>
>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from
>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from
>>> different companies would be good.
>>
>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least to
>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, let's
>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested in
>> joining us in a TLP.
>>
>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
>> welcome
>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked
>> well.
>>
>> --
>> Wendy
>
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
ok.
On Jan 28, 2008 2:44 PM, Brett Porter <bp...@exist.com> wrote:
> Yep, that's the type of proposal. It might be better to look for one
> from Jakarta since that's closer to Continuum's scenario. And the
> description I refer to is entered into the 1st and 3rd paragraph
> (though the description can be more than that if desired). It's really
> the "mission statement" and scope of the project.
>
> On 28/01/2008, at 9:40 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
> > Brett,
> >
> > What do you mean with "proposed project description, and the
> > proposal" ?
> > I thought to send only a proposal like this one:
> >
> http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/openejb-dev@incubator.apache.org/6461007.html
> > Do you think to something else?
> > If it's only that, I think I'll send it this week, maybe the next.
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2008 2:23 PM, Brett Porter <bp...@exist.com> wrote:
> >
> >> So, it seems like we are unanimous in favour of Emmanuel as the
> >> chair,
> >> and by lazy consensus agree to the committer list and initial PMC
> >> below :)
> >>
> >> Emmanuel, will you put together the proposed project description, and
> >> then the proposal for us to vote on?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Brett
> >>
> >> On 05/01/2008, at 10:00 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >>
> >>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
> >>>
> >>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
> >>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/
> >>> committers, and a chair.
> >>>
> >>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
> >>> there any other nominations?
> >>>
> >>> I have the current committers list as:
> >>> Maria Odea Ching
> >>> Joakim Erdfelt
> >>> Olivier Lamy
> >>> Trygve Laugstol
> >>> Jesse McConnell
> >>> Brett Porter
> >>> Edwin Punzalan
> >>> Carlos Sanchez
> >>> Wendy Smoak
> >>> Rahul Thakur
> >>> Emmanuel Venisse
> >>> Kenney Westerhof
> >>> Andrew Williams
> >>>
> >>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
> >>> Did I miss anyone?
> >>>
> >>> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
> >>> emeritus:
> >>> Herve Boutemy
> >>> Dan Diephouse
> >>> Fabrizio Giustina
> >>> Arnaud Heritier
> >>> Lukas Theussl
> >>> Jason van Zyl
> >>>
> >>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
> >>>
> >>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
> >>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Brett
> >>>
> >>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> So, what's next?
> >>>>
> >>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
> >>>> started on it?
> >>>>
> >>>> From past experience the steps would be:
> >>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
> >>>> participating in the TLP
> >>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
> >>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
> >>>>
> >>>> The board next meets in mid-January.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
> >>>>
> >>>> - Brett
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
> >>>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance
> >>>>>> to grow.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from
> >>>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from
> >>>>>> different companies would be good.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here,
> >>>>> let's
> >>>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested in
> >>>>> joining us in a TLP.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
> >>>>> welcome
> >>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
> >>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked
> >>>>> well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Wendy
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Posted by Brett Porter <bp...@exist.com>.
Yep, that's the type of proposal. It might be better to look for one
from Jakarta since that's closer to Continuum's scenario. And the
description I refer to is entered into the 1st and 3rd paragraph
(though the description can be more than that if desired). It's really
the "mission statement" and scope of the project.
On 28/01/2008, at 9:40 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Brett,
>
> What do you mean with "proposed project description, and the
> proposal" ?
> I thought to send only a proposal like this one:
> http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/openejb-dev@incubator.apache.org/6461007.html
> Do you think to something else?
> If it's only that, I think I'll send it this week, maybe the next.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Jan 28, 2008 2:23 PM, Brett Porter <bp...@exist.com> wrote:
>
>> So, it seems like we are unanimous in favour of Emmanuel as the
>> chair,
>> and by lazy consensus agree to the committer list and initial PMC
>> below :)
>>
>> Emmanuel, will you put together the proposed project description, and
>> then the proposal for us to vote on?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>>
>> On 05/01/2008, at 10:00 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>
>>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
>>>
>>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
>>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/
>>> committers, and a chair.
>>>
>>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
>>> there any other nominations?
>>>
>>> I have the current committers list as:
>>> Maria Odea Ching
>>> Joakim Erdfelt
>>> Olivier Lamy
>>> Trygve Laugstol
>>> Jesse McConnell
>>> Brett Porter
>>> Edwin Punzalan
>>> Carlos Sanchez
>>> Wendy Smoak
>>> Rahul Thakur
>>> Emmanuel Venisse
>>> Kenney Westerhof
>>> Andrew Williams
>>>
>>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
>>> Did I miss anyone?
>>>
>>> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
>>> emeritus:
>>> Herve Boutemy
>>> Dan Diephouse
>>> Fabrizio Giustina
>>> Arnaud Heritier
>>> Lukas Theussl
>>> Jason van Zyl
>>>
>>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
>>>
>>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
>>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Brett
>>>
>>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>>
>>>> So, what's next?
>>>>
>>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
>>>> started on it?
>>>>
>>>> From past experience the steps would be:
>>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
>>>> participating in the TLP
>>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
>>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
>>>>
>>>> The board next meets in mid-January.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
>>>>
>>>> - Brett
>>>>
>>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
>>>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance
>>>>>> to grow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from
>>>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from
>>>>>> different companies would be good.
>>>>>
>>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least
>>>>> to
>>>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here,
>>>>> let's
>>>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested in
>>>>> joining us in a TLP.
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
>>>>> welcome
>>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
>>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked
>>>>> well.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Wendy
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
Brett,
What do you mean with "proposed project description, and the proposal" ?
I thought to send only a proposal like this one:
http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/openejb-dev@incubator.apache.org/6461007.html
Do you think to something else?
If it's only that, I think I'll send it this week, maybe the next.
Emmanuel
On Jan 28, 2008 2:23 PM, Brett Porter <bp...@exist.com> wrote:
> So, it seems like we are unanimous in favour of Emmanuel as the chair,
> and by lazy consensus agree to the committer list and initial PMC
> below :)
>
> Emmanuel, will you put together the proposed project description, and
> then the proposal for us to vote on?
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> On 05/01/2008, at 10:00 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> > So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
> >
> > Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
> > need to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/
> > committers, and a chair.
> >
> > I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
> > there any other nominations?
> >
> > I have the current committers list as:
> > Maria Odea Ching
> > Joakim Erdfelt
> > Olivier Lamy
> > Trygve Laugstol
> > Jesse McConnell
> > Brett Porter
> > Edwin Punzalan
> > Carlos Sanchez
> > Wendy Smoak
> > Rahul Thakur
> > Emmanuel Venisse
> > Kenney Westerhof
> > Andrew Williams
> >
> > Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
> > Did I miss anyone?
> >
> > The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
> > emeritus:
> > Herve Boutemy
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Fabrizio Giustina
> > Arnaud Heritier
> > Lukas Theussl
> > Jason van Zyl
> >
> > Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
> >
> > Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
> > committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Brett
> >
> > On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >
> >> So, what's next?
> >>
> >> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
> >> started on it?
> >>
> >> From past experience the steps would be:
> >> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
> >> participating in the TLP
> >> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
> >> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
> >>
> >> The board next meets in mid-January.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
> >>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance
> >>>> to grow.
> >>>>
> >>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from
> >>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from
> >>>> different companies would be good.
> >>>
> >>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least
> >>> to
> >>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, let's
> >>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested in
> >>> joining us in a TLP.
> >>>
> >>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
> >>> welcome
> >>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
> >>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked
> >>> well.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Wendy
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Posted by Brett Porter <bp...@exist.com>.
So, it seems like we are unanimous in favour of Emmanuel as the chair,
and by lazy consensus agree to the committer list and initial PMC
below :)
Emmanuel, will you put together the proposed project description, and
then the proposal for us to vote on?
Cheers,
Brett
On 05/01/2008, at 10:00 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
>
> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/
> committers, and a chair.
>
> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
> there any other nominations?
>
> I have the current committers list as:
> Maria Odea Ching
> Joakim Erdfelt
> Olivier Lamy
> Trygve Laugstol
> Jesse McConnell
> Brett Porter
> Edwin Punzalan
> Carlos Sanchez
> Wendy Smoak
> Rahul Thakur
> Emmanuel Venisse
> Kenney Westerhof
> Andrew Williams
>
> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
> Did I miss anyone?
>
> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
> emeritus:
> Herve Boutemy
> Dan Diephouse
> Fabrizio Giustina
> Arnaud Heritier
> Lukas Theussl
> Jason van Zyl
>
> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
>
> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> So, what's next?
>>
>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
>> started on it?
>>
>> From past experience the steps would be:
>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
>> participating in the TLP
>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
>>
>> The board next meets in mid-January.
>>
>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance
>>>> to grow.
>>>>
>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from
>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from
>>>> different companies would be good.
>>>
>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least
>>> to
>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, let's
>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested in
>>> joining us in a TLP.
>>>
>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
>>> welcome
>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked
>>> well.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Wendy
>>
>
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Posted by Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>.
sorry, so it is clear in my previous mail...I second the nomination of
evenisse _and_ decline the nomination myself. If he doesn't want it then
I'll think about it, but in my mind there is no one more worthy of that
role.
cheers!
jesse
On Jan 9, 2008 6:50 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks Rahul.
>
> I appreciate the thought, however I decline the nomination at this
> time :)
>
> On 08/01/2008, at 5:00 AM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
>
> >
> > And the nominations are.....
> >
> > (~opens the envelope~)
> >
> > 1) Brett Porter
> >
> > , and
> >
> > 2) Jesse McConnell
> >
> > Cheers :-)
> > Rahul
> >
> >
> >
> > Brett Porter wrote:
> >> of course :)
> >>
> >> On 07/01/2008, at 5:09 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Are more than one nominations allowed per person?
> >>>
> >>> Rahul
> >>>
> >>> Brett Porter wrote:
> >>>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
> >>>>
> >>>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
> >>>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/
> >>>> committers, and a chair.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project.
> >>>> Are there any other nominations?
> >>>>
> >>>> I have the current committers list as:
> >>>> Maria Odea Ching
> >>>> Joakim Erdfelt
> >>>> Olivier Lamy
> >>>> Trygve Laugstol
> >>>> Jesse McConnell
> >>>> Brett Porter
> >>>> Edwin Punzalan
> >>>> Carlos Sanchez
> >>>> Wendy Smoak
> >>>> Rahul Thakur
> >>>> Emmanuel Venisse
> >>>> Kenney Westerhof
> >>>> Andrew Williams
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
> >>>> Did I miss anyone?
> >>>>
> >>>> The following have committed only once, or have declared
> >>>> themselves emeritus:
> >>>> Herve Boutemy
> >>>> Dan Diephouse
> >>>> Fabrizio Giustina
> >>>> Arnaud Heritier
> >>>> Lukas Theussl
> >>>> Jason van Zyl
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
> >>>>
> >>>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
> >>>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Brett
> >>>>
> >>>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> So, what's next?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
> >>>>> started on it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From past experience the steps would be:
> >>>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
> >>>>> participating in the TLP
> >>>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
> >>>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The board next meets in mid-January.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Brett
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top
> >>>>>>> Level Project at ASF and the continuum community will have
> >>>>>>> more chance to grow.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer
> >>>>>>> from different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers
> >>>>>>> from different companies would be good.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at
> >>>>>> least to
> >>>>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here,
> >>>>>> let's
> >>>>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>> joining us in a TLP.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
> >>>>>> welcome
> >>>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
> >>>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it
> >>>>>> worked well.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Wendy
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Thanks Rahul.
I appreciate the thought, however I decline the nomination at this
time :)
On 08/01/2008, at 5:00 AM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
>
> And the nominations are.....
>
> (~opens the envelope~)
>
> 1) Brett Porter
>
> , and
>
> 2) Jesse McConnell
>
> Cheers :-)
> Rahul
>
>
>
> Brett Porter wrote:
>> of course :)
>>
>> On 07/01/2008, at 5:09 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Are more than one nominations allowed per person?
>>>
>>> Rahul
>>>
>>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
>>>>
>>>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
>>>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/
>>>> committers, and a chair.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project.
>>>> Are there any other nominations?
>>>>
>>>> I have the current committers list as:
>>>> Maria Odea Ching
>>>> Joakim Erdfelt
>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>> Trygve Laugstol
>>>> Jesse McConnell
>>>> Brett Porter
>>>> Edwin Punzalan
>>>> Carlos Sanchez
>>>> Wendy Smoak
>>>> Rahul Thakur
>>>> Emmanuel Venisse
>>>> Kenney Westerhof
>>>> Andrew Williams
>>>>
>>>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
>>>> Did I miss anyone?
>>>>
>>>> The following have committed only once, or have declared
>>>> themselves emeritus:
>>>> Herve Boutemy
>>>> Dan Diephouse
>>>> Fabrizio Giustina
>>>> Arnaud Heritier
>>>> Lukas Theussl
>>>> Jason van Zyl
>>>>
>>>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
>>>>
>>>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
>>>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Brett
>>>>
>>>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So, what's next?
>>>>>
>>>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
>>>>> started on it?
>>>>>
>>>>> From past experience the steps would be:
>>>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
>>>>> participating in the TLP
>>>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
>>>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
>>>>>
>>>>> The board next meets in mid-January.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top
>>>>>>> Level Project at ASF and the continuum community will have
>>>>>>> more chance to grow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer
>>>>>>> from different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers
>>>>>>> from different companies would be good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at
>>>>>> least to
>>>>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here,
>>>>>> let's
>>>>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> joining us in a TLP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
>>>>>> welcome
>>>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
>>>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it
>>>>>> worked well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Wendy
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
hehe, thanks for the nomination :)
Emmanuel
Jesse McConnell a écrit :
> hehe, I am honored to be mentioned
>
> I would second brett's nomination of evenisse as chair, can't think of
> anyone that has given more to the project in the last couple of years :)
>
> jesse
>
> On Jan 7, 2008 3:00 PM, Rahul Thakur <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And the nominations are.....
>>
>> (~opens the envelope~)
>>
>> 1) Brett Porter
>>
>> , and
>>
>> 2) Jesse McConnell
>>
>> Cheers :-)
>> Rahul
>>
>>
>>
>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>> of course :)
>>>
>>> On 07/01/2008, at 5:09 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are more than one nominations allowed per person?
>>>>
>>>> Rahul
>>>>
>>>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>>>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
>>>>>
>>>>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
>>>>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial
>>>>> PMC/committers, and a chair.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
>>>>> there any other nominations?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have the current committers list as:
>>>>> Maria Odea Ching
>>>>> Joakim Erdfelt
>>>>> Olivier Lamy
>>>>> Trygve Laugstol
>>>>> Jesse McConnell
>>>>> Brett Porter
>>>>> Edwin Punzalan
>>>>> Carlos Sanchez
>>>>> Wendy Smoak
>>>>> Rahul Thakur
>>>>> Emmanuel Venisse
>>>>> Kenney Westerhof
>>>>> Andrew Williams
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
>>>>> Did I miss anyone?
>>>>>
>>>>> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
>>>>> emeritus:
>>>>> Herve Boutemy
>>>>> Dan Diephouse
>>>>> Fabrizio Giustina
>>>>> Arnaud Heritier
>>>>> Lukas Theussl
>>>>> Jason van Zyl
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
>>>>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Brett
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So, what's next?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
>>>>>> started on it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From past experience the steps would be:
>>>>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
>>>>>> participating in the TLP
>>>>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
>>>>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The board next meets in mid-January.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
>>>>>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance
>>>>>>>> to grow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from
>>>>>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from
>>>>>>>> different companies would be good.
>>>>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least
>> to
>>>>>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, let's
>>>>>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested in
>>>>>>> joining us in a TLP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
>>>>>>> welcome
>>>>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
>>>>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked
>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Wendy
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Posted by Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>.
hehe, I am honored to be mentioned
I would second brett's nomination of evenisse as chair, can't think of
anyone that has given more to the project in the last couple of years :)
jesse
On Jan 7, 2008 3:00 PM, Rahul Thakur <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> And the nominations are.....
>
> (~opens the envelope~)
>
> 1) Brett Porter
>
> , and
>
> 2) Jesse McConnell
>
> Cheers :-)
> Rahul
>
>
>
> Brett Porter wrote:
> > of course :)
> >
> > On 07/01/2008, at 5:09 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Are more than one nominations allowed per person?
> >>
> >> Rahul
> >>
> >> Brett Porter wrote:
> >>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
> >>>
> >>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
> >>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial
> >>> PMC/committers, and a chair.
> >>>
> >>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
> >>> there any other nominations?
> >>>
> >>> I have the current committers list as:
> >>> Maria Odea Ching
> >>> Joakim Erdfelt
> >>> Olivier Lamy
> >>> Trygve Laugstol
> >>> Jesse McConnell
> >>> Brett Porter
> >>> Edwin Punzalan
> >>> Carlos Sanchez
> >>> Wendy Smoak
> >>> Rahul Thakur
> >>> Emmanuel Venisse
> >>> Kenney Westerhof
> >>> Andrew Williams
> >>>
> >>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
> >>> Did I miss anyone?
> >>>
> >>> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
> >>> emeritus:
> >>> Herve Boutemy
> >>> Dan Diephouse
> >>> Fabrizio Giustina
> >>> Arnaud Heritier
> >>> Lukas Theussl
> >>> Jason van Zyl
> >>>
> >>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
> >>>
> >>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
> >>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Brett
> >>>
> >>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> So, what's next?
> >>>>
> >>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
> >>>> started on it?
> >>>>
> >>>> From past experience the steps would be:
> >>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
> >>>> participating in the TLP
> >>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
> >>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
> >>>>
> >>>> The board next meets in mid-January.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
> >>>>
> >>>> - Brett
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
> >>>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance
> >>>>>> to grow.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from
> >>>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from
> >>>>>> different companies would be good.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least
> to
> >>>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, let's
> >>>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested in
> >>>>> joining us in a TLP.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
> >>>>> welcome
> >>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
> >>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked
> >>>>> well.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Wendy
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>
>
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Posted by Rahul Thakur <ra...@gmail.com>.
And the nominations are.....
(~opens the envelope~)
1) Brett Porter
, and
2) Jesse McConnell
Cheers :-)
Rahul
Brett Porter wrote:
> of course :)
>
> On 07/01/2008, at 5:09 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
>
>>
>> Are more than one nominations allowed per person?
>>
>> Rahul
>>
>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
>>>
>>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
>>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial
>>> PMC/committers, and a chair.
>>>
>>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
>>> there any other nominations?
>>>
>>> I have the current committers list as:
>>> Maria Odea Ching
>>> Joakim Erdfelt
>>> Olivier Lamy
>>> Trygve Laugstol
>>> Jesse McConnell
>>> Brett Porter
>>> Edwin Punzalan
>>> Carlos Sanchez
>>> Wendy Smoak
>>> Rahul Thakur
>>> Emmanuel Venisse
>>> Kenney Westerhof
>>> Andrew Williams
>>>
>>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
>>> Did I miss anyone?
>>>
>>> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
>>> emeritus:
>>> Herve Boutemy
>>> Dan Diephouse
>>> Fabrizio Giustina
>>> Arnaud Heritier
>>> Lukas Theussl
>>> Jason van Zyl
>>>
>>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
>>>
>>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
>>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Brett
>>>
>>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>>
>>>> So, what's next?
>>>>
>>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
>>>> started on it?
>>>>
>>>> From past experience the steps would be:
>>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
>>>> participating in the TLP
>>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
>>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
>>>>
>>>> The board next meets in mid-January.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
>>>>
>>>> - Brett
>>>>
>>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
>>>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance
>>>>>> to grow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from
>>>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from
>>>>>> different companies would be good.
>>>>>
>>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least to
>>>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, let's
>>>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested in
>>>>> joining us in a TLP.
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
>>>>> welcome
>>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
>>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked
>>>>> well.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Wendy
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
of course :)
On 07/01/2008, at 5:09 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
>
> Are more than one nominations allowed per person?
>
> Rahul
>
> Brett Porter wrote:
>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
>>
>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we
>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/
>> committers, and a chair.
>>
>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
>> there any other nominations?
>>
>> I have the current committers list as:
>> Maria Odea Ching
>> Joakim Erdfelt
>> Olivier Lamy
>> Trygve Laugstol
>> Jesse McConnell
>> Brett Porter
>> Edwin Punzalan
>> Carlos Sanchez
>> Wendy Smoak
>> Rahul Thakur
>> Emmanuel Venisse
>> Kenney Westerhof
>> Andrew Williams
>>
>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer?
>> Did I miss anyone?
>>
>> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
>> emeritus:
>> Herve Boutemy
>> Dan Diephouse
>> Fabrizio Giustina
>> Arnaud Heritier
>> Lukas Theussl
>> Jason van Zyl
>>
>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
>>
>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>>
>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>
>>> So, what's next?
>>>
>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
>>> started on it?
>>>
>>> From past experience the steps would be:
>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
>>> participating in the TLP
>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
>>>
>>> The board next meets in mid-January.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
>>>
>>> - Brett
>>>
>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
>>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance
>>>>> to grow.
>>>>>
>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from
>>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from
>>>>> different companies would be good.
>>>>
>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at
>>>> least to
>>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, let's
>>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested in
>>>> joining us in a TLP.
>>>>
>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is
>>>> welcome
>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked
>>>> well.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Wendy
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
Posted by Rahul Thakur <ra...@gmail.com>.
Are more than one nominations allowed per person?
Rahul
Brett Porter wrote:
> So the poll for progressing seems in favour.
>
> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we need
> to decide on a description for the project, the initial
> PMC/committers, and a chair.
>
> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are
> there any other nominations?
>
> I have the current committers list as:
> Maria Odea Ching
> Joakim Erdfelt
> Olivier Lamy
> Trygve Laugstol
> Jesse McConnell
> Brett Porter
> Edwin Punzalan
> Carlos Sanchez
> Wendy Smoak
> Rahul Thakur
> Emmanuel Venisse
> Kenney Westerhof
> Andrew Williams
>
> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer? Did
> I miss anyone?
>
> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves
> emeritus:
> Herve Boutemy
> Dan Diephouse
> Fabrizio Giustina
> Arnaud Heritier
> Lukas Theussl
> Jason van Zyl
>
> Anyone on that list that would like to be included?
>
> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of
> committers. Any objections or opinions about that?
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> So, what's next?
>>
>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
>> started on it?
>>
>> From past experience the steps would be:
>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in
>> participating in the TLP
>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC
>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board
>>
>> The board next meets in mid-January.
>>
>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this?
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level
>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance to
>>>> grow.
>>>>
>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from
>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from
>>>> different companies would be good.
>>>
>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least to
>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, let's
>>> talk about it on dev@maven and see who else might be interested in
>>> joining us in a TLP.
>>>
>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is welcome
>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future.
>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked well.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Wendy
>>
>
>