You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Michael Dürig <md...@apache.org> on 2018/11/19 16:50:44 UTC
Intent to backport OAK-7867 to Oak 1.8 and 1.6
Hi,
I intend to backport OAK-7867 to Oak 1.8 and 1.6. This fixes an issue
that can cause sever data loss with the segment node store. There is a
medium to high risk with this backport as it touches some of the core
parts of the segment node store. To mitigate the risk we ran a 14 days
longevity test internally (Adobe), which did not show any significant
difference with any of the tracked metrics. Furthermore I plan to run
each of those backports through the same longevity test before including
them in a release.
Michael
Re: Intent to backport OAK-7867 to Oak 1.8 and 1.6
Posted by Francesco Mari <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 17:50, Michael Dürig <md...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to backport OAK-7867 to Oak 1.8 and 1.6. This fixes an issue
> that can cause sever data loss with the segment node store. There is a
> medium to high risk with this backport as it touches some of the core
> parts of the segment node store. To mitigate the risk we ran a 14 days
> longevity test internally (Adobe), which did not show any significant
> difference with any of the tracked metrics. Furthermore I plan to run
> each of those backports through the same longevity test before including
> them in a release.
>
> Michael
>
Re: Intent to backport OAK-7867 to Oak 1.8 and 1.6
Posted by Woonsan Ko <wo...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:50 AM Michael Dürig <md...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I intend to backport OAK-7867 to Oak 1.8 and 1.6. This fixes an issue
> that can cause sever data loss with the segment node store. There is a
> medium to high risk with this backport as it touches some of the core
> parts of the segment node store. To mitigate the risk we ran a 14 days
> longevity test internally (Adobe), which did not show any significant
> difference with any of the tracked metrics. Furthermore I plan to run
> each of those backports through the same longevity test before including
> them in a release.
Cool! Thank you very much!
Woonsan
>
> Michael