You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hama.apache.org by Thomas Jungblut <tj...@apache.org> on 2012/10/22 09:51:12 UTC
Release planning
Just a quick question:
Should we cut the scalability improvements (messaging + graph) for the next
release?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-644
I feel like they take more time to clearly think about what we need to do,
because it requires digging through various abstraction levels (messaging,
fault tolerance).
Anyone want to volunteer to help with writing down specifications and
planning them? Thanks in advance.
Re: Release planning
Posted by Thomas Jungblut <th...@gmail.com>.
Yes, that would be my current opinion as well.
FYI I have written down my thoughts of scalability improvements here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Fud5zSFuKDAEz3E8T59ldZtg1H-IMx2CQGbn_bib_eA/edit
Everybody with the link can edit the doc, so feel free adding your ideas.
2012/10/22 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> I think we can release current trunk as a Hama 0.6. At least, I had
> confirmed that 2 Racks hama cluster can crunch 1 billion edges graph.
> Many of the currently opened issues for 0.6 are pretty tricky
> problems.
>
> WDYT, Thomas?
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Thomas Jungblut <tj...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Just a quick question:
> >
> > Should we cut the scalability improvements (messaging + graph) for the
> next
> > release?
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-644
> >
> > I feel like they take more time to clearly think about what we need to
> do,
> > because it requires digging through various abstraction levels
> (messaging,
> > fault tolerance).
> > Anyone want to volunteer to help with writing down specifications and
> > planning them? Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
Re: Release planning
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
I think we can release current trunk as a Hama 0.6. At least, I had
confirmed that 2 Racks hama cluster can crunch 1 billion edges graph.
Many of the currently opened issues for 0.6 are pretty tricky
problems.
WDYT, Thomas?
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Thomas Jungblut <tj...@apache.org> wrote:
> Just a quick question:
>
> Should we cut the scalability improvements (messaging + graph) for the next
> release?
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-644
>
> I feel like they take more time to clearly think about what we need to do,
> because it requires digging through various abstraction levels (messaging,
> fault tolerance).
> Anyone want to volunteer to help with writing down specifications and
> planning them? Thanks in advance.
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon