You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@forrest.apache.org by Steven Noels <st...@outerthought.org> on 2002/12/09 19:39:41 UTC
module.xml
Folks,
I see us being listed as apache-forrest(-forrestbar) on Gump, and I
wonder whether we don't confuse people about our heritage. Is it OK if I
apply this?
Index: module.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-forrest/module.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 module.xml
--- module.xml 19 Nov 2002 14:56:23 -0000 1.9
+++ module.xml 9 Dec 2002 18:37:00 -0000
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
<credit>This product includes software developed by CollabNet
(http://www.Collab.Net/).</credit>
</credits>
- <project name="apache-forrest">
+ <project name="xml-forrest">
<version fix="0" major="0" minor="3" tag="-dev"/>
<package>org.apache.forrest</package>
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
</project>
- <project name="apache-forrest-forrestbar">
+ <project name="xml-forrest-forrestbar">
<ant target="forrestbar"/>
</Steven>
--
Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org
Re: module.xml
Posted by Jeff Turner <je...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 09:25:24AM +0100, Steven Noels wrote:
> Jeff Turner wrote:
>
> >xml-forrest means to us, "The Apache XML Project's Forrest subproject".
> >
> >But to newcomers, how obvious is that association? I think most will see
> >the 'xml-' and expand the name to "Extensible Markup Language Forrest",
> >which doesn't make much sense.
> >
> >Besides which, I think the official project name (in the credit logo) is
> >"Apache Forrest"..
>
> Yes - but we belong to the 'federation' of xml.a.o projects. If you
> look at http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/latest/, forrest is somehow
> alienated from the rest of the pack.
It occurred to me that build.xml doesn't use the name from module.xml
anyway, so +1. I just applied the patch.
--Jeff
> </Steven>
> --
> Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/
> Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
> Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
> stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org
>
Re: module.xml
Posted by Steven Noels <st...@outerthought.org>.
Jeff Turner wrote:
> xml-forrest means to us, "The Apache XML Project's Forrest subproject".
>
> But to newcomers, how obvious is that association? I think most will see
> the 'xml-' and expand the name to "Extensible Markup Language Forrest",
> which doesn't make much sense.
>
> Besides which, I think the official project name (in the credit logo) is
> "Apache Forrest"..
Yes - but we belong to the 'federation' of xml.a.o projects. If you look
at http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/latest/, forrest is somehow
alienated from the rest of the pack.
</Steven>
--
Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org
Re: module.xml
Posted by Jeff Turner <je...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 07:39:41PM +0100, Steven Noels wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I see us being listed as apache-forrest(-forrestbar) on Gump, and I
> wonder whether we don't confuse people about our heritage. Is it OK if I
> apply this?
+0
xml-forrest means to us, "The Apache XML Project's Forrest subproject".
But to newcomers, how obvious is that association? I think most will see
the 'xml-' and expand the name to "Extensible Markup Language Forrest",
which doesn't make much sense.
Besides which, I think the official project name (in the credit logo) is
"Apache Forrest"..
--Jeff
...
> </Steven>
> --
> Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/
> Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
> Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
> stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org
>
Re: module.xml
Posted by Nicola Ken Barozzi <ni...@apache.org>.
Steven Noels wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I see us being listed as apache-forrest(-forrestbar) on Gump, and I
> wonder whether we don't confuse people about our heritage. Is it OK if I
> apply this?
Ok.
> Index: module.xml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-forrest/module.xml,v
> retrieving revision 1.9
> diff -u -r1.9 module.xml
> --- module.xml 19 Nov 2002 14:56:23 -0000 1.9
> +++ module.xml 9 Dec 2002 18:37:00 -0000
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
> <credit>This product includes software developed by CollabNet
> (http://www.Collab.Net/).</credit>
> </credits>
> - <project name="apache-forrest">
> + <project name="xml-forrest">
> <version fix="0" major="0" minor="3" tag="-dev"/>
> <package>org.apache.forrest</package>
>
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
>
> </project>
>
> - <project name="apache-forrest-forrestbar">
> + <project name="xml-forrest-forrestbar">
>
> <ant target="forrestbar"/>
>
> </Steven>
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------