You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@libcloud.apache.org by Jim Spring <jm...@gmail.com> on 2018/08/01 02:09:33 UTC
[dev] Azure Storage fixtures
We are looking at improving (fixing) the storage apis in LibCloud for
Azure. Despite having versioned APIs, somethings have changed like -
content length is required when posting a blob. So we wanted to get things
in better order and are planning on a PR, etc. for such.
A couple of questions that came up -
How were the current fixtures generated (they appear to be 6 years old)?
If we wanted to update them, what would be the process / criteria for such?
(Is there anything special beyond a PR that gets reviewed? Assuming tests
work, etc).
Thanks
-jim spring
Re: [dev] Azure Storage fixtures
Posted by Samuel Marks <sa...@gmail.com>.
As long as the tests are compliant with the latest fixtures, and the
interface exposed doesn't change—or has defaults; so people's codebase
doesn't need to change to match—then I don't see why it wouldn't be
accepted (IMHO).
Samuel Marks
http://linkedin.com/in/samuelmarks
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:09 PM Jim Spring <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are looking at improving (fixing) the storage apis in LibCloud for
> Azure. Despite having versioned APIs, somethings have changed like -
> content length is required when posting a blob. So we wanted to get things
> in better order and are planning on a PR, etc. for such.
>
> A couple of questions that came up -
>
> How were the current fixtures generated (they appear to be 6 years old)?
> If we wanted to update them, what would be the process / criteria for such?
> (Is there anything special beyond a PR that gets reviewed? Assuming tests
> work, etc).
>
> Thanks
> -jim spring
>