You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Charles Benett <ch...@apache.org> on 2002/12/31 12:55:21 UTC
Tagging CVS was Re: New repository/new branch
Serge Knystautas wrote:
> Danny Angus wrote:
>
>> My personal opinion closely matches Matthew's. If you want to stabilize
>> development of 2.1, and encourage development of 3.0, then name 2.1 a
>> branch. If you want to encourage development of two divergent code
>> bases, then create two CVS trees.
>>
>>
>> I think we have a concensus then, both internally and incuding Sam's
>> comment, for a branch?
>>
>> d.
>
I agree that work on 2.1.x should be in a branch with head being work on
3.0.
>
>
> I think so. I'll go ahead and tag and branch later tonight unless
> there's someone wants me to hold on it.
>
> Serge Knystautas
> Loki Technologies
> http://www.lokitech.com/
>
Serge,
I haven't got access to cvs docs at the moment but that doesn't sound
right. I think (could be wrong) that you need to tag with 2.1 when we
release. Then (later) when someone has a 2.1.1 change, the branch is made.
Charles
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Tagging CVS was Re: New repository/new branch
Posted by Charles Benett <ch...@apache.org>.
Cool
C
Serge Knystautas wrote:
> Charles Benett wrote:
>
>> Serge,
>> I haven't got access to cvs docs at the moment but that doesn't sound
>> right. I think (could be wrong) that you need to tag with 2.1 when we
>> release. Then (later) when someone has a 2.1.1 change, the branch is
>> made.
>> Charles
>
>
> Yeah that approach is right, but like Noel said we have some changes
> that were voted against into this release, so there's stuff
> immediately pending.
>
> Serge Knystautas
> Loki Technologies
> http://www.lokitech.com/
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Tagging CVS was Re: New repository/new branch
Posted by Serge Knystautas <se...@lokitech.com>.
Charles Benett wrote:
> Serge,
> I haven't got access to cvs docs at the moment but that doesn't sound
> right. I think (could be wrong) that you need to tag with 2.1 when we
> release. Then (later) when someone has a 2.1.1 change, the branch is made.
> Charles
Yeah that approach is right, but like Noel said we have some changes
that were voted against into this release, so there's stuff immediately
pending.
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: Tagging CVS was Re: New repository/new branch
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
> I think (could be wrong) that you need to tag with 2.1 when we
> release. Then (later) when someone has a 2.1.1 change, the
> branch is made.
Charles, I have patches to apply immediately. :-) I just want to get v2.1
out for the users before starting to apply them.
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>