You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by "Andy Seaborne (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/01/30 18:38:10 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (JENA-628) TransformFilterPlacement does not always
push down through assign/extend when it could
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Andy Seaborne closed JENA-628.
------------------------------
> TransformFilterPlacement does not always push down through assign/extend when it could
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-628
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-628
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ARQ
> Affects Versions: Jena 2.11.1
> Reporter: Rob Vesse
> Assignee: Rob Vesse
> Fix For: Jena 2.11.2
>
>
> I've noticed a bug in the improved TransformFilterPlacement where it doesn't always do the correct thing when pushing through assign/extend in cases where the placement into BGPs is disabled.
> Consider the following example algebra:
> {noformat}
> (filter (= ?x 123) (assign ((?z 123)) (bgp (?s ?p ?x)) ))
> {noformat}
> With optFilterPlacementBGP enabled this produces the following improved algebra:
> {noformat}
> (assign ((?z 123)) (filter (= ?x 123) (bgp (?s ?p ?x)) ))
> {noformat}
> However with optFilterPlacementBGP disabled this leaves the algebra as is even though it could safely push it through the bind without pushing it into the BGP itself.
> I think the fix for this is trivial and I will apply it shortly. I will also look and see if there are other cases where it fails to push down as far as it could.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)