You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2017/01/19 21:45:08 UTC
[VOTE] uimaj-sdk 3.0.0 rc3 (alpha)
Hi,
Here's RC3. The changes from RC2 involved JCasGen for the new built-in types;
they were missing from tables JCasGen uses to construct the proper imports.
-----------
If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
The list of changes in Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/
<http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/>
The Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1116/
The SVN tags are here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0/
and for the Eclipse Update Site:
http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/eclipse-update-site/
<http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/eclipse-update-site/>
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] uimaj-sdk 3.0.0 rc3 (alpha)
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Cancelled due to two issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5270 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5272
(bad hashcode impl, and redo 3 new built-ins as non-builtins for better
backwards compatibility and interoperability).
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-sdk 3.0.0 rc3 (alpha)
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I agree with you but was scared of potential issues. But I'll give it another
try, using -alpha and -beta, and then no suffix for the "real" release.
Eclipse artifacts (plugins, features) will be marked as 3.0.0.alpha (the dot is
the Eclipse convention).
I'll give it a try. I think the trial builds (those with versions ending in
"-SNAPSHOT") are not quite correct because the maven build helper plugin that
converts between maven convention names and eclipse convention names does a
conversion only for the 1st '-', changing it to a period.
E.G. a version "3.0.0-alpha-SNAPSHOT" gets converted to
"3.0.0.alpha-SNAPSHOT", whereas
a version "3.0.0-SNAPSHOT" gets converted to "3.0.0.SNAPSHOT".
I think that might not be a problem for an actual release (where "-SNAPSHOT" is
dropped), because the version will be 3.0.0-alpha and the eclipse version will
be 3.0.0.alpha.
The other issue I saw was that the maven ordering of versions. This is
discussed here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13004443/how-does-maven-sort-version-numbers
I think this will be OK except for -SNAPSHOT versions, but perhaps that's OK.
Thanks for "pushing back"... and motivating a deeper investigation into this
arcana ...
-Marshall
On 1/22/2017 4:30 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
> If we release a 3.0.0 version, people will consider it stable, no matter
> how you mark it. E.g. people looking at Maven Central won't even notice
> that marker. I'm somewhat -1 for a 3.0.0 version at this point.
>
> Why don't we release as 3.0.0-alpha-1?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Richard
>
>> On 20.01.2017, at 15:26, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, my current thought is to do a 3.0.0 release, and "mark" it in the announce
>> email and in the news and on the download page as being "alpha" level quality.
>>
>> The intent is that it is an official release from an Apache point of view so
>> many more people can try it out and give feedback :-), while acknowledging that
>> it's "early" in the quality-hardening cycle.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>> On 1/20/2017 3:26 AM, Peter Kl�gl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> what happens when there are three +1 votes? Will there be a 3.0.0 release?
>>>
>>>
>>> This would be of course OK for me, just asking. I am quite busy these
>>> days, could take some time until I can review it.
>>>
>>>
>>> (I assume that it could be a bit complicated/error-prone/undesirable to
>>> change the version of the RC afterwards to alpha)
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 19.01.2017 um 22:45 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Here's RC3. The changes from RC2 involved JCasGen for the new built-in types;
>>>> they were missing from tables JCasGen uses to construct the proper imports.
>>>>
>>>> -----------
>>>>
>>>> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
>>>> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
>>>> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
>>>> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>>>>
>>>> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
>>>> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
>>>> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
>>>> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>>>>
>>>> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
>>>> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
>>>> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>>>>
>>>> The list of changes in Jira:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>>>>
>>>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>>>>
>>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/
>>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/>
>>>>
>>>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1116/
>>>>
>>>> The SVN tags are here:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0/
>>>>
>>>> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/eclipse-update-site/
>>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/eclipse-update-site/>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-sdk 3.0.0 rc3 (alpha)
Posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org>.
If we release a 3.0.0 version, people will consider it stable, no matter
how you mark it. E.g. people looking at Maven Central won't even notice
that marker. I'm somewhat -1 for a 3.0.0 version at this point.
Why don't we release as 3.0.0-alpha-1?
Cheers,
-- Richard
> On 20.01.2017, at 15:26, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, my current thought is to do a 3.0.0 release, and "mark" it in the announce
> email and in the news and on the download page as being "alpha" level quality.
>
> The intent is that it is an official release from an Apache point of view so
> many more people can try it out and give feedback :-), while acknowledging that
> it's "early" in the quality-hardening cycle.
>
> -Marshall
>
>
> On 1/20/2017 3:26 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> what happens when there are three +1 votes? Will there be a 3.0.0 release?
>>
>>
>> This would be of course OK for me, just asking. I am quite busy these
>> days, could take some time until I can review it.
>>
>>
>> (I assume that it could be a bit complicated/error-prone/undesirable to
>> change the version of the RC afterwards to alpha)
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 19.01.2017 um 22:45 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here's RC3. The changes from RC2 involved JCasGen for the new built-in types;
>>> they were missing from tables JCasGen uses to construct the proper imports.
>>>
>>> -----------
>>>
>>> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
>>> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
>>> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
>>> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>>>
>>> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
>>> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
>>> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
>>> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>>>
>>> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
>>> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
>>> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>>>
>>> The list of changes in Jira:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>>>
>>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>>>
>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/
>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/>
>>>
>>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1116/
>>>
>>> The SVN tags are here:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0/
>>>
>>> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/eclipse-update-site/
>>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/eclipse-update-site/>
>>>
>>> Please vote on release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-sdk 3.0.0 rc3 (alpha)
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Yes, my current thought is to do a 3.0.0 release, and "mark" it in the announce
email and in the news and on the download page as being "alpha" level quality.
The intent is that it is an official release from an Apache point of view so
many more people can try it out and give feedback :-), while acknowledging that
it's "early" in the quality-hardening cycle.
-Marshall
On 1/20/2017 3:26 AM, Peter Kl�gl wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> what happens when there are three +1 votes? Will there be a 3.0.0 release?
>
>
> This would be of course OK for me, just asking. I am quite busy these
> days, could take some time until I can review it.
>
>
> (I assume that it could be a bit complicated/error-prone/undesirable to
> change the version of the RC afterwards to alpha)
>
>
> Best,
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 19.01.2017 um 22:45 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here's RC3. The changes from RC2 involved JCasGen for the new built-in types;
>> they were missing from tables JCasGen uses to construct the proper imports.
>>
>> -----------
>>
>> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
>> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
>> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
>> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>>
>> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
>> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
>> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
>> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>>
>> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
>> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
>> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>>
>> The list of changes in Jira:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>>
>> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>>
>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/
>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/>
>>
>> The Maven artifacts are here:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1116/
>>
>> The SVN tags are here:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0/
>>
>> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
>> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/eclipse-update-site/
>> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/eclipse-update-site/>
>>
>> Please vote on release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-sdk 3.0.0 rc3 (alpha)
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Hi,
what happens when there are three +1 votes? Will there be a 3.0.0 release?
This would be of course OK for me, just asking. I am quite busy these
days, could take some time until I can review it.
(I assume that it could be a bit complicated/error-prone/undesirable to
change the version of the RC afterwards to alpha)
Best,
Peter
Am 19.01.2017 um 22:45 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> Hi,
>
> Here's RC3. The changes from RC2 involved JCasGen for the new built-in types;
> they were missing from tables JCasGen uses to construct the proper imports.
>
> -----------
>
> If you happen to use JCas in your pipelines, and have JCas classes other than
> the standard built-in ones, these classes will need to be regenerated or
> migrated. If you use the Maven JCasGen plugin to generate the JCas classes as
> part of your project's build, your good - nothing special need be done.
>
> There is a migration tool, and there are scripts to run it, as well as Eclipse
> launch configurations to run it. The instructions for running this are in a new
> documentation "book", part of the binary distribution (html and pdf) - it's
> called the Uima V3 User's Guide.
>
> The guide also has an overview section which lists the new features of this
> release. Many of these need more test cases written for them; I'm happy to
> mentor any volunteers who want to improve the testing .
>
> The list of changes in Jira:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.0.0SDK-alpha
>
> The source and binary zip/tars and the Eclipse update site are staged to
>
> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/
> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/>
>
> The Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1116/
>
> The SVN tags are here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-3.0.0/
>
> and for the Eclipse Update Site:
> http://home.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/eclipse-update-site/
> <http://home.apache.org/%7Eschor/uima-release-candidates/uv3-alpha-rc3/eclipse-update-site/>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] uimaj-sdk 3.0.0 rc3 (alpha)
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
signatures OK
compare of svn tag with source-release: OK
issues-fixed - OK
LICENSE / NOTICE : no change from prev. 2.9.0 release
3 new 3rd party components in bin distr, all already covered under Apache v2
license, no notices
build from sources - OK.
in unzipped binary: ran adjust example paths, and doc analyzer. looked at
results in Java results viewer - OK
install into newly-unzipped Eclipse Neon, and run component descriptor editor
and jcasgen , using new built-in types - OK
[X] +1 OK to release
-Marshall