You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> on 2012/03/02 16:58:03 UTC

[VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Hi,

The poll at http://www.doodle.com/zpnpmcv69pfaw73f shows +14 for
Blackrabbit and +12 for Oak (with two unknowns for Oak), of whom four
people have preferred both or neither, so we'll need a followup vote
to decide which one of these most popular candidates to use.

Thus, please vote on which of these two codenames we should use for
the jr3 implementation effort:

    [ ] Blackrabbit
    [ ] Oak

The vote is open until Monday, after which I'll use the name with most
support to set up subproject infrastructure as described in [1].

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Jackrabbit%203%20Strategic%20Plan

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by Stefan Guggisberg <st...@gmail.com>.
> Thus, please vote on which of these two codenames we should use for
> the jr3 implementation effort:

 [x] Oak

cheers
stefan

Re: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by Alex Parvulescu <al...@gmail.com>.
[x] Oak

Tough decision, the blackrabbit one was pretty cool too.

alex



On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thus, please vote on which of these two codenames we should use for
> > the jr3 implementation effort:
>
>     [x] Oak
>
> That was a tough one, as I like both alternatives. My vote falls on
> Oak as it's short, simple and clearly distinct from current
> Jackrabbit.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>

Re: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thus, please vote on which of these two codenames we should use for
> the jr3 implementation effort:

    [x] Oak

That was a tough one, as I like both alternatives. My vote falls on
Oak as it's short, simple and clearly distinct from current
Jackrabbit.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by Tobias Bocanegra <tr...@adobe.com>.
>    [ ] Blackrabbit
>    [X] Oak

Regards, Toby

[RESULT] [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thus, please vote on which of these two codenames we should use for
> the jr3 implementation effort:
>
>    [ ] Blackrabbit
>    [ ] Oak
>
> The vote is open until Monday, after which I'll use the name with most
> support to set up subproject infrastructure as described in [1].

The vote results are as follows:

    +4 Blackrabbit
    +7 Oak

Meanwhile the Doodle poll has evolved to show +16 to Blackrabbit and
+17 for Oak.

Oak has the advantage and so we'll go with that. I'll set up the new
mailing list, issue tracker and svn space in a moment. Any volunteers
to join as moderators for the mailing list?

As discussed earlier and mentioned again by Roy, the Oak name is a bit
troublesome for more general branding, which reinforces the point that
we'll use it as a codename for the development effort and decide later
on whether to brand the result as "Jackrabbit 3" or something else.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by Sébastien Launay <se...@gmail.com>.
[X] Blackrabbit
[ ] Oak

--
Sébastien Launay

Re: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by Bart van der Schans <b....@onehippo.com>.
>    [ ] Blackrabbit
>    [X] Oak

Regards,
Bart

AW: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by KÖLL Claus <C....@TIROL.GV.AT>.
>      [x] Blackrabbit
>      [ ] Oak

greets claus

Re: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by "Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>.
On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:07 AM, David Nuescheler wrote:

> [ ] Blackrabbit
> [x] Oak
> 
> "The oak is a common symbol of strength and endurance ..." -> wikipedia

Yeah, it's also one of the more commonly used codenames.  Java itself was
called Oak before its release.  But that's okay as long as we don't plan
on releasing it under that name.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oak_%28programming_language%29

....Roy


Re: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by David Nuescheler <un...@adobe.com>.
[ ] Blackrabbit
[x] Oak

"The oak is a common symbol of strength and endurance ..." -> wikipedia

regards,
david

Re: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by Thomas Mueller <mu...@adobe.com>.
[x] Blackrabbit

As a codename both are fine, but Blackrabbit is less generic.



Re: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by Michael Dürig <md...@apache.org>.

>      [x] Blackrabbit
>      [ ] Oak

Michael

Re: [VOTE] Codename for the jr3 implementation effort (Was: [jr3] Codename)

Posted by Alexander Klimetschek <ak...@adobe.com>.
[ ] Blackrabbit
[x] Oak

Cheers,
Alex

-- 
Alexander Klimetschek
Developer // Adobe (Day) // Berlin - Basel