You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by "J.Pietschmann" <j3...@yahoo.de> on 2003/06/29 23:36:48 UTC

ZIP distribution or installation program?

Hi all,
Given messsages like
  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-user&m=105689746128501&w=2
should we provide the FOP distributions as ZIP files too?

Then there's also
  http://www.izforge.com/izpack/
(GPL)
If somebody could have a look at it and post a short review...

A really interesting idea would be to convince the Greater
Federation, or at least the Java part, to build on some
graphical installer, as CygWin does for ages. This should
really cut down redundant jar downloads, and we could even
integrate Jimi/JAI/JCE downloads without much legal issues,
because the graphical installer would show the shrink-wrap
licenses and ask the user for agreement.

J.Pietschmann



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: ZIP distribution or installation program?

Posted by Christian Geisert <ch...@isu-gmbh.de>.
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> On 29.06.2003 23:36:48 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> 
>>Given messsages like
>>  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-user&m=105689746128501&w=2
>>should we provide the FOP distributions as ZIP files too?
> 
> +1

+1

The dist target already creates ZIPs and I actually don't why
we only do .tgz distributions ;-)

Mmmh maybe disk space.


> Remember the discussions about ASF repository reorganisation on
> community@? Maybe the Gump, Maven and Krysalis Centipede guys have ideas

Which lead to the creation of repository@ ...
(really quiet these days except for some spam)

Christian


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: ZIP distribution or installation program?

Posted by "Peter B. West" <pb...@powerup.com.au>.
I'll mention it to the PMC to see if there is consensus to take it to 
the Borad.  I've been thinking a little about how the "management" 
structure can become more proactive in what is the essentially reactive 
environment of Open Source.  One way is to try to whip up enthusiasm for 
projects or extensions to existing projects that the PMC or Board 
considers necessary for the health of Apache.

Peter

J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Peter B. West wrote:
> 
>> FWIW, I think this and your earlier suggestion along these lines are 
>> excellent ideas.  Ease of installation and configuration need to be 
>> given a high profile in Apache projects.  As always, resourcing is the 
>> problem.
> 
> 
> Thanks. Want to take it to community@ or general@jakarta? Unfortunately,
> I can't devote time to sell this to the masses.

-- 
Peter B. West  http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: ZIP distribution or installation program?

Posted by "J.Pietschmann" <j3...@yahoo.de>.
Peter B. West wrote:
> FWIW, I think this and your earlier suggestion along these lines are 
> excellent ideas.  Ease of installation and configuration need to be 
> given a high profile in Apache projects.  As always, resourcing is the 
> problem.

Thanks. Want to take it to community@ or general@jakarta? Unfortunately,
I can't devote time to sell this to the masses.

J.Pietschmann



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: ZIP distribution or installation program?

Posted by "Peter B. West" <pb...@powerup.com.au>.
J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> 
>> Remember the discussions about ASF repository reorganisation on
>> community@?
> 
> 
> Faded off inconclusivly, except for mirroring...
> 
>> Maybe the Gump, Maven and Krysalis Centipede guys have ideas
>> related to this.
> 
> 
> Ideas: yes. Solutions: mmmmm.
> 
>> Also keep an eye on Krysalis Version
>> (http://www.krysalis.org/version) that's providing a little bit of base
>> functionality in this region. Just my 0.02 CHF.
> 
> 
> I can't see from the overview page how this helps here any more
> than Maven does.
> 
> Gump and Maved have dependency information, this is a good start.
> What is needed is a small GUI installer similar to Cygwin setup,
> only slightly better:
> - Present a nice form for entering connection data by the user
>   (especially proxy setup) and perhaps for other preferences
> - Manage persistent connection data and preferences
> - Manage the mirror list
> - Present a nice wizard to choose packages to download, keep an eye
>   on dependencies
> - Tell the user about the download size
> - Let the user choose downloading optional non-apache packages
> - Present licenses for non-apache packages
> - Perhaps manage which licenses the user already has agreed (does
>   somebody know of a case where a user did *not* agree to a license?)
> - Provide for canceling and temporary suspending a download
> - Manage partial downloads
> - Manage downloaded packages in order to avoid downloading the same
>   or a compatible package twice
> - Update classpath settings, config files, build properties and
>   whatnot, as necessary
> The core part is the package picking wizard, most of the rest is
> fancy bywork which could be deferred.
> 
> Well, there's jpackage.org.

FWIW, I think this and your earlier suggestion along these lines are 
excellent ideas.  Ease of installation and configuration need to be 
given a high profile in Apache projects.  As always, resourcing is the 
problem.

Peter
-- 
Peter B. West  http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: ZIP distribution or installation program?

Posted by "J.Pietschmann" <j3...@yahoo.de>.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Remember the discussions about ASF repository reorganisation on
> community@?

Faded off inconclusivly, except for mirroring...

> Maybe the Gump, Maven and Krysalis Centipede guys have ideas
> related to this.

Ideas: yes. Solutions: mmmmm.

> Also keep an eye on Krysalis Version
> (http://www.krysalis.org/version) that's providing a little bit of base
> functionality in this region. Just my 0.02 CHF.

I can't see from the overview page how this helps here any more
than Maven does.

Gump and Maved have dependency information, this is a good start.
What is needed is a small GUI installer similar to Cygwin setup,
only slightly better:
- Present a nice form for entering connection data by the user
   (especially proxy setup) and perhaps for other preferences
- Manage persistent connection data and preferences
- Manage the mirror list
- Present a nice wizard to choose packages to download, keep an eye
   on dependencies
- Tell the user about the download size
- Let the user choose downloading optional non-apache packages
- Present licenses for non-apache packages
- Perhaps manage which licenses the user already has agreed (does
   somebody know of a case where a user did *not* agree to a license?)
- Provide for canceling and temporary suspending a download
- Manage partial downloads
- Manage downloaded packages in order to avoid downloading the same
   or a compatible package twice
- Update classpath settings, config files, build properties and
   whatnot, as necessary
The core part is the package picking wizard, most of the rest is
fancy bywork which could be deferred.

Well, there's jpackage.org.

J.Pietschmann


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: ZIP distribution or installation program?

Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>.
On 29.06.2003 23:36:48 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Given messsages like
>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-user&m=105689746128501&w=2
> should we provide the FOP distributions as ZIP files too?

+1

> Then there's also
>   http://www.izforge.com/izpack/
> (GPL)
> If somebody could have a look at it and post a short review...

Not enough time ATM, I'm afraid.

> A really interesting idea would be to convince the Greater
> Federation, or at least the Java part, to build on some
> graphical installer, as CygWin does for ages. This should
> really cut down redundant jar downloads, and we could even
> integrate Jimi/JAI/JCE downloads without much legal issues,
> because the graphical installer would show the shrink-wrap
> licenses and ask the user for agreement.

Remember the discussions about ASF repository reorganisation on
community@? Maybe the Gump, Maven and Krysalis Centipede guys have ideas
related to this. Also keep an eye on Krysalis Version
(http://www.krysalis.org/version) that's providing a little bit of base
functionality in this region. Just my 0.02 CHF.

Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: ZIP distribution or installation program?

Posted by "J.Pietschmann" <j3...@yahoo.de>.
Glen Mazza wrote:
>>  http://www.izforge.com/izpack/
>>(GPL)

> Errr...I wouldn't know for sure here, and am looking
> forward to being enlightened on this--but when you
> distribute anything with a GPL doesn't that require
> the rest of the app to be GPL as well?

It depends on how the whole beast works and which exceptions
are made by the overall licensing. If you compile a C program
with gcc, the executable isn't covered by the GPL despite quite
a bit of FSF code goes into the result. The auxillary files
which have to be linked are explicitely not GPL.

If the installer works vaguely similar, we might be able to
use it.

J.Pietschmann



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Re: ZIP distribution or installation program?

Posted by Glen Mazza <gr...@yahoo.com>.
--- "J.Pietschmann" <j3...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Given messsages like
>  
>
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-user&m=105689746128501&w=2
> should we provide the FOP distributions as ZIP files
> too?

Perhaps a good idea--will Gump do this for
us?--Cocoon, Axis, Xalan, and Struts are all supplying
both ZIP and TAR formats.


> 
> Then there's also
>   http://www.izforge.com/izpack/
> (GPL)
> If somebody could have a look at it and post a short
> review...
> 

Errr...I wouldn't know for sure here, and am looking
forward to being enlightened on this--but when you
distribute anything with a GPL doesn't that require
the rest of the app to be GPL as well?  Even the LGPL
is a not permitted for Apache apps, correct?  

Glen

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org