You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Damian Guy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/25 13:36:04 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-9340) ParquetTypeConverter incorrectly handling of repeated types results in schema mismatch

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Damian Guy updated SPARK-9340:
------------------------------
    Attachment: ParquetTypesConverterTest.scala

Failing test

> ParquetTypeConverter incorrectly handling of repeated types results in schema mismatch
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-9340
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9340
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 1.4.0
>            Reporter: Damian Guy
>         Attachments: ParquetTypesConverterTest.scala
>
>
> The way ParquetTypesConverter handles primitive repeated types results in an incompatible schema being used for querying data. For example, given a schema like so:
> message root {
>    repeated int32 repeated_field;
>  }
> Spark produces a read schema like:
> message root {
>    optional int32 repeated_field;
>  }
> These are incompatible and all attempts to read fail.
> In ParquetTypesConverter.toDataType:
>  if (parquetType.isPrimitive) {
>       toPrimitiveDataType(parquetType.asPrimitiveType, isBinaryAsString, isInt96AsTimestamp)
>     } else {...}
> The if condition should also have !parquetType.isRepetition(Repetition.REPEATED)
>  
> And then this case will need to be handled in the else 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org