You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Charles Moulliard <ch...@gmail.com> on 2013/07/03 08:48:28 UTC
Suggestion : Pax XML Features file hosted by karaf
Hi,
As Apache Karaf uses by default OSGI HTTP Service and Pax Web, why don't we
include the Pax XML Features file part of our distro (like we do for spring
and also for aries - enterprise features) and not as a link in our XML
features file ?
<repository>mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-features/${pax.web.version}/xml/features</repository>
Regards,
--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Re: Suggestion : Pax XML Features file hosted by karaf
Posted by Charles Moulliard <ch...@gmail.com>.
Will check trunk of Karaf 3.x. Thx ;-)
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> It's already the case on trunk.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 07/03/2013 08:48 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As Apache Karaf uses by default OSGI HTTP Service and Pax Web, why don't
>> we
>> include the Pax XML Features file part of our distro (like we do for
>> spring
>> and also for aries - enterprise features) and not as a link in our XML
>> features file ?
>>
>> <repository>mvn:org.ops4j.pax.**web/pax-web-features/${pax.**
>> web.version}/xml/features</**repository>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Re: Suggestion : Pax XML Features file hosted by karaf
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Charles,
It's already the case on trunk.
Regards
JB
On 07/03/2013 08:48 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As Apache Karaf uses by default OSGI HTTP Service and Pax Web, why don't we
> include the Pax XML Features file part of our distro (like we do for spring
> and also for aries - enterprise features) and not as a link in our XML
> features file ?
>
> <repository>mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-features/${pax.web.version}/xml/features</repository>
>
> Regards,
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Suggestion : Pax XML Features file hosted by karaf
Posted by Charles Moulliard <ch...@gmail.com>.
Agree with you Guillaume.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
> For karaf 2.x branches, we're still using pax-web 1.1.x which did not
> provide a features repository.
> Btw, I think we may want to consider upgrading karaf 2.4 to pax-web 3.0 if
> we plan to do a release on that branch.
>
>
> 2013/7/3 Charles Moulliard <ch...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As Apache Karaf uses by default OSGI HTTP Service and Pax Web, why don't
> we
> > include the Pax XML Features file part of our distro (like we do for
> spring
> > and also for aries - enterprise features) and not as a link in our XML
> > features file ?
> >
> >
> >
> <repository>mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-features/${pax.web.version}/xml/features</repository>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Charles Moulliard
> > Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
> > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> >
>
--
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Re: Suggestion : Pax XML Features file hosted by karaf
Posted by Łukasz Dywicki <lu...@code-house.org>.
I agree that release of Karaf 3.0 is necessary, however hosting 2.4 branch after all can have sense. It can be latest bridge between 2.x and 3.x and will let user base migrate easily to same versions of artifacts to new structure. But once again I want to note, that we should consider that *after* 3.0 release.
Cheers,
Łukasz Dywicki
--
luke@code-house.org
Twitter: ldywicki
Blog: http://dywicki.pl
Code-House - http://code-house.org
Wiadomość napisana przez Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com> w dniu 17 lip 2013, o godz. 10:59:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'd rather would like to see 3.0 next instead of a 2.4.
> It already contains pax-web 3.0 and Felix 4.
> We really should focus on this right now.
>
> Regards, Achim
>
> Am Mittwoch, 17. Juli 2013 schrieb Claus Ibsen :
>
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@apache.org<javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>> For karaf 2.x branches, we're still using pax-web 1.1.x which did not
>>> provide a features repository.
>>> Btw, I think we may want to consider upgrading karaf 2.4 to pax-web 3.0
>> if
>>> we plan to do a release on that branch.
>>>
>>
>> If a Karaf 2.4 branch is in the works. Would considering upgrading to
>> Felix 4.0.x be possible?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> 2013/7/3 Charles Moulliard <ch007m@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> As Apache Karaf uses by default OSGI HTTP Service and Pax Web, why
>> don't we
>>>> include the Pax XML Features file part of our distro (like we do for
>> spring
>>>> and also for aries - enterprise features) and not as a link in our XML
>>>> features file ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> <repository>mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-features/${pax.web.version}/xml/features</repository>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Charles Moulliard
>>>> Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> Email: cibsen@redhat.com <javascript:;>
>> Twitter: davsclaus
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
> Project Lead
> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
> Commiter & Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: Suggestion : Pax XML Features file hosted by karaf
Posted by Achim Nierbeck <bc...@googlemail.com>.
Hi guys,
I'd rather would like to see 3.0 next instead of a 2.4.
It already contains pax-web 3.0 and Felix 4.
We really should focus on this right now.
Regards, Achim
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juli 2013 schrieb Claus Ibsen :
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@apache.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > For karaf 2.x branches, we're still using pax-web 1.1.x which did not
> > provide a features repository.
> > Btw, I think we may want to consider upgrading karaf 2.4 to pax-web 3.0
> if
> > we plan to do a release on that branch.
> >
>
> If a Karaf 2.4 branch is in the works. Would considering upgrading to
> Felix 4.0.x be possible?
>
>
> >
> > 2013/7/3 Charles Moulliard <ch007m@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As Apache Karaf uses by default OSGI HTTP Service and Pax Web, why
> don't we
> >> include the Pax XML Features file part of our distro (like we do for
> spring
> >> and also for aries - enterprise features) and not as a link in our XML
> >> features file ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> <repository>mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-features/${pax.web.version}/xml/features</repository>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Charles Moulliard
> >> Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
> >> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Email: cibsen@redhat.com <javascript:;>
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
>
--
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
Commiter & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Re: Suggestion : Pax XML Features file hosted by karaf
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
> For karaf 2.x branches, we're still using pax-web 1.1.x which did not
> provide a features repository.
> Btw, I think we may want to consider upgrading karaf 2.4 to pax-web 3.0 if
> we plan to do a release on that branch.
>
If a Karaf 2.4 branch is in the works. Would considering upgrading to
Felix 4.0.x be possible?
>
> 2013/7/3 Charles Moulliard <ch...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As Apache Karaf uses by default OSGI HTTP Service and Pax Web, why don't we
>> include the Pax XML Features file part of our distro (like we do for spring
>> and also for aries - enterprise features) and not as a link in our XML
>> features file ?
>>
>>
>> <repository>mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-features/${pax.web.version}/xml/features</repository>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Charles Moulliard
>> Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
Re: Suggestion : Pax XML Features file hosted by karaf
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
For karaf 2.x branches, we're still using pax-web 1.1.x which did not
provide a features repository.
Btw, I think we may want to consider upgrading karaf 2.4 to pax-web 3.0 if
we plan to do a release on that branch.
2013/7/3 Charles Moulliard <ch...@gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> As Apache Karaf uses by default OSGI HTTP Service and Pax Web, why don't we
> include the Pax XML Features file part of our distro (like we do for spring
> and also for aries - enterprise features) and not as a link in our XML
> features file ?
>
>
> <repository>mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web/pax-web-features/${pax.web.version}/xml/features</repository>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Charles Moulliard
> Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>