You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by TomohitoNakayama <to...@basil.ocn.ne.jp> on 2005/10/08 08:08:55 UTC
Re: Questions about what is component to be shared (Re: Discussions on Wik ... )
Hello.
Sorry ...
Not module, but component.
Best regareds.
/*
Tomohito Nakayama
tomonaka@basil.ocn.ne.jp
tomohito@rose.zero.ad.jp
tmnk@apache.org
Naka
http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
*/
----- Original Message -----
From: "TomohitoNakayama" <to...@basil.ocn.ne.jp>
To: "Derby Development" <de...@db.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 2:59 PM
Subject: Questions about what is module to be shared (Re: Discussions on Wik ... )
> Hello.
>
> I post my questions around shared module.
>
> What is the modules to be shread ?
>
> David shows me the list of modules to be shared in next url.
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/ListOfSharedComponent
>
> However, David justs lists them (At least I recognized as so) and,
> I think we need to think about this list in order to make it clear what is the module to be shared .
>
> At first, I think we should think next :
> * Definition of each element in the lists.
>
> And I think what we need to be careful about is as next :
> * Is granularity of this list reasonable as shared module ?
> * Are there any other elements which should be included in this lists ?
> * Is it possible to share the element as the shared module ?
>
> Best regards .
>
> /*
>
> Tomohito Nakayama
> tomonaka@basil.ocn.ne.jp
> tomohito@rose.zero.ad.jp
> tmnk@apache.org
>
> Naka
> http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
>
> */
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David W. Van Couvering" <Da...@Sun.COM>
> To: "Derby Development" <de...@db.apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 5:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Discussions on Wiki - WAS Re: SQL functions, procedures and PSM - a possible approach
>
>
>> Hi, Tomohito. It would be great if you could summarize your concerns in
>> email and we can continue our discussion on the list.
>>
>> If it would help, I'm also more than open for you and I to have an IRC
>> conversation, log it, and send the log out to the list. We do seem to
>> be a bit stuck :)
>>
>> David
>>
>> TomohitoNakayama wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I understand. Sorry for disturbing .
>>> I had come to feel difficulties in discussing at Wiki.
>>>
>>> Should I ask David my question in mailing list once more ?
>>>
>>> Best regards.
>>>
>>> /*
>>>
>>> Tomohito Nakayama
>>> tomonaka@basil.ocn.ne.jp
>>> tomohito@rose.zero.ad.jp
>>> tmnk@apache.org
>>>
>>> Naka
>>> http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
>>>
>>> */
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David W. Van Couvering"
>>> <Da...@Sun.COM>
>>> To: "Derby Development" <de...@db.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:40 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Discussions on Wiki - WAS Re: SQL functions, procedures and
>>> PSM - a possible approach
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm getting a little concerned, it feels a little quiet over there in
>>>> the corner with Tomohito and I, and I was about to propose with
>>>> Tomohito that we move it back to the list.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> David W. Van Couvering wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> This sounds great, Dan! Is this a good candidate for putting up on the
>>>>>> Wiki site as a proposal?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anyone else concerned by the movement of discussion to the wiki for
>>>>> the common code stuff? The Apache way is for discussions to occur on the
>>>>> mailing lists. It seems to me that the wiki is a great way to summarize
>>>>> such discussions, but not to hold them. A wiki page related to a
>>>>> discussion can provide a very useful single overview, something that
>>>>> does get lost in mailings as the discussion spreads out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>>> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/123 - Release Date: 2005/10/06
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 2005/10/07
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 2005/10/07
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 2005/10/07
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 2005/10/07