You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com> on 2009/08/05 15:16:26 UTC
Re: Cutting over SMX4 features and NMR to Karaf
Folks,
I'd like to put what I've done so far onto an integration branch for review
etc.
Can some committer create such a branch for the NMR and features SVN
repositories? Once this is done, I'll submit a patch for the Karaf port.
As I mentioned on another thread, there was a problematic dependency between
the NMR/features integration tests and the old kernel
AbstractIntegrationTest framework. After discussing this issue with
Guillaume last week, I took the pragmatic approach of moving a cut-down
version of the testing support into the NMR repo. The problematic tests are
now passing.
Cheers,
Eoghan
2009/7/10 Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>
> Seems like we broad agreement that this is a good thing, so I'll look
> into putting together a patch.
>
> Obviously I'll need a committer to create the maintenance branches
> before applying the patch to trunk.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
Re: Cutting over SMX4 features and NMR to Karaf
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
So I've committed a fix on the NMR/karaf assembly so that it builds
correctly and can be started.
It does not fully work yet, mostly because the command bundles for NMR and
JBI can't start correctly and karaf stops loading those (I've raised a JIRA
and will fix that asap).
So I think the first thing is to migrate the shell commands to use blueprint
so that they are actually available in the shell.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 13:18, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2009/8/19 Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>
>
>> Thanks Guillaume, opening up the sandbox will make it very convenient to
>> submit further changes.
>>
>> BTW have you had a chance to review the changes already made on this
>> branch?
>>
>
> I'm doing that right now.
> I've already spotted some issues and I'll commit fixes tonight.
>
>
>>
>> The main issue remaining to be tackled is related to the blueprint usage
>> in
>> Karaf. Specifically whether the Spring-DM-style config used widely in the
>> nmr modules can peacefully coexist with the blueprint usage in karaf, or
>> whether the nmr configs will need to ported to blueprint in the
>> short-term.
>>
>> Also a related question on the <command-bundle> style config for the nmr
>> shell extensions, which will I guess have to switch over from the old
>>
>> http://servicemix.apache.org/schema/servicemix-gshell/servicemix-gshell.xsdschema
>> to the new
>> http://felix.apache.org/karaf/xmlns/gshell/v1.0.0 schema. Presumably
>> usage
>> of the latter implies a switch-over to blueprint for the commands config,
>> but can that be done independently of the spring-dm config used by the
>> non-command bundles?
>>
>
> Right, commands could be switched over independantly.
> For the other configs, it mainly depends if there are strong dependencies
> on spring-dm.
> Spring extensions dependencies might be ok (such as in the jbi cluster
> engine which
> depends on spring-jms), but we need to have an overview and discuss which
> one we want
> to migrate.
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eoghan
>>
>> 2009/8/19 Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > Btw, the sandbox has been opened to all Apache committers.
>> > So Eoghan, feel free to make any change there.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 18:10, Chris Custine <ch...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Just FYI for anyone monitoring this thread, Karaf integration is being
>> > > tracked on this Jira issue:
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-332
>> > >
>> > > The sandbox code is at the following URLs:
>> > >
>> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/karaf/nmr
>> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/karaf/features
>> > >
>> > > Chris
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Chris Custine
>> > > FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
>> > > My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
>> > > Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
>> > > Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> jb@nanthrax.net
>> > > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Nevermind, I have just seen your jira tasks :)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Folks,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I'd like to put what I've done so far onto an integration branch
>> for
>> > > >> review
>> > > >> etc.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Can some committer create such a branch for the NMR and features
>> SVN
>> > > >> repositories? Once this is done, I'll submit a patch for the Karaf
>> > port.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> As I mentioned on another thread, there was a problematic
>> dependency
>> > > >> between
>> > > >> the NMR/features integration tests and the old kernel
>> > > >> AbstractIntegrationTest framework. After discussing this issue with
>> > > >> Guillaume last week, I took the pragmatic approach of moving a
>> > cut-down
>> > > >> version of the testing support into the NMR repo. The problematic
>> > tests
>> > > >> are
>> > > >> now passing.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Cheers,
>> > > >> Eoghan
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2009/7/10 Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Seems like we broad agreement that this is a good thing, so I'll
>> look
>> > > >>> into putting together a patch.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Obviously I'll need a committer to create the maintenance branches
>> > > >>> before applying the patch to trunk.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Cheers,
>> > > >>> Eoghan
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > > --
>> > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
>> > > > BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
>> > > > http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
>> > > > jb@nanthrax.net
>> > > > PGP : 17D4F086
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Guillaume Nodet
>> > ------------------------
>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> > ------------------------
>> > Open Source SOA
>> > http://fusesource.com
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: Cutting over SMX4 features and NMR to Karaf
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
2009/8/19 Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>
> Thanks Guillaume, opening up the sandbox will make it very convenient to
> submit further changes.
>
> BTW have you had a chance to review the changes already made on this
> branch?
>
I'm doing that right now.
I've already spotted some issues and I'll commit fixes tonight.
>
> The main issue remaining to be tackled is related to the blueprint usage in
> Karaf. Specifically whether the Spring-DM-style config used widely in the
> nmr modules can peacefully coexist with the blueprint usage in karaf, or
> whether the nmr configs will need to ported to blueprint in the short-term.
>
> Also a related question on the <command-bundle> style config for the nmr
> shell extensions, which will I guess have to switch over from the old
>
> http://servicemix.apache.org/schema/servicemix-gshell/servicemix-gshell.xsdschema
> to the new
> http://felix.apache.org/karaf/xmlns/gshell/v1.0.0 schema. Presumably usage
> of the latter implies a switch-over to blueprint for the commands config,
> but can that be done independently of the spring-dm config used by the
> non-command bundles?
>
Right, commands could be switched over independantly.
For the other configs, it mainly depends if there are strong dependencies on
spring-dm.
Spring extensions dependencies might be ok (such as in the jbi cluster
engine which
depends on spring-jms), but we need to have an overview and discuss which
one we want
to migrate.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
> 2009/8/19 Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>
>
> > Btw, the sandbox has been opened to all Apache committers.
> > So Eoghan, feel free to make any change there.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 18:10, Chris Custine <ch...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Just FYI for anyone monitoring this thread, Karaf integration is being
> > > tracked on this Jira issue:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-332
> > >
> > > The sandbox code is at the following URLs:
> > >
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/karaf/nmr
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/karaf/features
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > --
> > > Chris Custine
> > > FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
> > > My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
> > > Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
> > > Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nevermind, I have just seen your jira tasks :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Folks,
> > > >>
> > > >> I'd like to put what I've done so far onto an integration branch for
> > > >> review
> > > >> etc.
> > > >>
> > > >> Can some committer create such a branch for the NMR and features SVN
> > > >> repositories? Once this is done, I'll submit a patch for the Karaf
> > port.
> > > >>
> > > >> As I mentioned on another thread, there was a problematic dependency
> > > >> between
> > > >> the NMR/features integration tests and the old kernel
> > > >> AbstractIntegrationTest framework. After discussing this issue with
> > > >> Guillaume last week, I took the pragmatic approach of moving a
> > cut-down
> > > >> version of the testing support into the NMR repo. The problematic
> > tests
> > > >> are
> > > >> now passing.
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >> Eoghan
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2009/7/10 Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>
> > > >>
> > > >> Seems like we broad agreement that this is a good thing, so I'll
> look
> > > >>> into putting together a patch.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Obviously I'll need a committer to create the maintenance branches
> > > >>> before applying the patch to trunk.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Cheers,
> > > >>> Eoghan
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
> > > > BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
> > > > http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> > > > jb@nanthrax.net
> > > > PGP : 17D4F086
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > ------------------------
> > Open Source SOA
> > http://fusesource.com
> >
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: Cutting over SMX4 features and NMR to Karaf
Posted by Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Guillaume, opening up the sandbox will make it very convenient to
submit further changes.
BTW have you had a chance to review the changes already made on this branch?
The main issue remaining to be tackled is related to the blueprint usage in
Karaf. Specifically whether the Spring-DM-style config used widely in the
nmr modules can peacefully coexist with the blueprint usage in karaf, or
whether the nmr configs will need to ported to blueprint in the short-term.
Also a related question on the <command-bundle> style config for the nmr
shell extensions, which will I guess have to switch over from the old
http://servicemix.apache.org/schema/servicemix-gshell/servicemix-gshell.xsdschema
to the new
http://felix.apache.org/karaf/xmlns/gshell/v1.0.0 schema. Presumably usage
of the latter implies a switch-over to blueprint for the commands config,
but can that be done independently of the spring-dm config used by the
non-command bundles?
Cheers,
Eoghan
2009/8/19 Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>
> Btw, the sandbox has been opened to all Apache committers.
> So Eoghan, feel free to make any change there.
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 18:10, Chris Custine <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Just FYI for anyone monitoring this thread, Karaf integration is being
> > tracked on this Jira issue:
> > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-332
> >
> > The sandbox code is at the following URLs:
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/karaf/nmr
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/karaf/features
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > --
> > Chris Custine
> > FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
> > My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
> > Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
> > Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Nevermind, I have just seen your jira tasks :)
> > >
> > >
> > > Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> > >
> > >> Folks,
> > >>
> > >> I'd like to put what I've done so far onto an integration branch for
> > >> review
> > >> etc.
> > >>
> > >> Can some committer create such a branch for the NMR and features SVN
> > >> repositories? Once this is done, I'll submit a patch for the Karaf
> port.
> > >>
> > >> As I mentioned on another thread, there was a problematic dependency
> > >> between
> > >> the NMR/features integration tests and the old kernel
> > >> AbstractIntegrationTest framework. After discussing this issue with
> > >> Guillaume last week, I took the pragmatic approach of moving a
> cut-down
> > >> version of the testing support into the NMR repo. The problematic
> tests
> > >> are
> > >> now passing.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Eoghan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2009/7/10 Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >> Seems like we broad agreement that this is a good thing, so I'll look
> > >>> into putting together a patch.
> > >>>
> > >>> Obviously I'll need a committer to create the maintenance branches
> > >>> before applying the patch to trunk.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Eoghan
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > > --
> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
> > > BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
> > > http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> > > jb@nanthrax.net
> > > PGP : 17D4F086
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
Re: Cutting over SMX4 features and NMR to Karaf
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Btw, the sandbox has been opened to all Apache committers.
So Eoghan, feel free to make any change there.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 18:10, Chris Custine <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just FYI for anyone monitoring this thread, Karaf integration is being
> tracked on this Jira issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-332
>
> The sandbox code is at the following URLs:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/karaf/nmr
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/karaf/features
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Chris Custine
> FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
> My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
> Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
> Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net
> >wrote:
>
> > Nevermind, I have just seen your jira tasks :)
> >
> >
> > Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> >
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> I'd like to put what I've done so far onto an integration branch for
> >> review
> >> etc.
> >>
> >> Can some committer create such a branch for the NMR and features SVN
> >> repositories? Once this is done, I'll submit a patch for the Karaf port.
> >>
> >> As I mentioned on another thread, there was a problematic dependency
> >> between
> >> the NMR/features integration tests and the old kernel
> >> AbstractIntegrationTest framework. After discussing this issue with
> >> Guillaume last week, I took the pragmatic approach of moving a cut-down
> >> version of the testing support into the NMR repo. The problematic tests
> >> are
> >> now passing.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Eoghan
> >>
> >>
> >> 2009/7/10 Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Seems like we broad agreement that this is a good thing, so I'll look
> >>> into putting together a patch.
> >>>
> >>> Obviously I'll need a committer to create the maintenance branches
> >>> before applying the patch to trunk.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Eoghan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
> > BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
> > http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> > jb@nanthrax.net
> > PGP : 17D4F086
> >
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: Cutting over SMX4 features and NMR to Karaf
Posted by Chris Custine <ch...@gmail.com>.
Just FYI for anyone monitoring this thread, Karaf integration is being
tracked on this Jira issue:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-332
The sandbox code is at the following URLs:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/karaf/nmr
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/karaf/features
Chris
--
Chris Custine
FUSESource :: http://fusesource.com
My Blog :: http://blog.organicelement.com
Apache ServiceMix :: http://servicemix.apache.org
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
> Nevermind, I have just seen your jira tasks :)
>
>
> Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'd like to put what I've done so far onto an integration branch for
>> review
>> etc.
>>
>> Can some committer create such a branch for the NMR and features SVN
>> repositories? Once this is done, I'll submit a patch for the Karaf port.
>>
>> As I mentioned on another thread, there was a problematic dependency
>> between
>> the NMR/features integration tests and the old kernel
>> AbstractIntegrationTest framework. After discussing this issue with
>> Guillaume last week, I took the pragmatic approach of moving a cut-down
>> version of the testing support into the NMR repo. The problematic tests
>> are
>> now passing.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eoghan
>>
>>
>> 2009/7/10 Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Seems like we broad agreement that this is a good thing, so I'll look
>>> into putting together a patch.
>>>
>>> Obviously I'll need a committer to create the maintenance branches
>>> before applying the patch to trunk.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Eoghan
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
> BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
> http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
> jb@nanthrax.net
> PGP : 17D4F086
>
Re: Cutting over SMX4 features and NMR to Karaf
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Nevermind, I have just seen your jira tasks :)
Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to put what I've done so far onto an integration branch for review
> etc.
>
> Can some committer create such a branch for the NMR and features SVN
> repositories? Once this is done, I'll submit a patch for the Karaf port.
>
> As I mentioned on another thread, there was a problematic dependency between
> the NMR/features integration tests and the old kernel
> AbstractIntegrationTest framework. After discussing this issue with
> Guillaume last week, I took the pragmatic approach of moving a cut-down
> version of the testing support into the NMR repo. The problematic tests are
> now passing.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
>
> 2009/7/10 Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>
>
>> Seems like we broad agreement that this is a good thing, so I'll look
>> into putting together a patch.
>>
>> Obviously I'll need a committer to create the maintenance branches
>> before applying the patch to trunk.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eoghan
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
jb@nanthrax.net
PGP : 17D4F086
Re: Cutting over SMX4 features and NMR to Karaf
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Eoghan,
Did you raised a jira task on the NMR and features branch ?
Else, I will create one.
Regards
JB
Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to put what I've done so far onto an integration branch for review
> etc.
>
> Can some committer create such a branch for the NMR and features SVN
> repositories? Once this is done, I'll submit a patch for the Karaf port.
>
> As I mentioned on another thread, there was a problematic dependency between
> the NMR/features integration tests and the old kernel
> AbstractIntegrationTest framework. After discussing this issue with
> Guillaume last week, I took the pragmatic approach of moving a cut-down
> version of the testing support into the NMR repo. The problematic tests are
> now passing.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
>
> 2009/7/10 Eoghan Glynn <eo...@gmail.com>
>
>> Seems like we broad agreement that this is a good thing, so I'll look
>> into putting together a patch.
>>
>> Obviously I'll need a committer to create the maintenance branches
>> before applying the patch to trunk.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eoghan
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader
http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
jb@nanthrax.net
PGP : 17D4F086