You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Felix Knecht <fe...@otego.com> on 2010/06/03 18:58:44 UTC

Are both constructors needed?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

SubtreeSpecificationChecker has two constructors, but the one with the
oidsMap parameter doesn't gives any benefit, as the parameter isn't
used. Is this constructor a historical hangover or for future use?

Felix


http://people.apache.org/~felixk/shared-docs/xref/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/subtree/SubtreeSpecificationChecker.html#56
http://people.apache.org/~felixk/shared-docs/xref/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/subtree/SubtreeSpecificationChecker.html#70
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwH30QACgkQ2lZVCB08qHHKbwCcDkQcqvm6PLVhY4KMaY0lDl7c
Q1YAnAyGtZPYQmM37RrW6NZxFbRhbMam
=9Kxp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Are both constructors needed?

Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.

On 6/3/10 6:58 PM, Felix Knecht wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> SubtreeSpecificationChecker has two constructors, but the one with the
> oidsMap parameter doesn't gives any benefit, as the parameter isn't
> used. Is this constructor a historical hangover or for future use?
>
> Felix
>
>
>    
I think you can remove this one :
> http://people.apache.org/~felixk/shared-docs/xref/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/subtree/SubtreeSpecificationChecker.html#56
>    

The oidMaps was supposely used to normalize elements, but we now use the 
SchemaManager directly.

-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com