You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" <de...@db.apache.org> on 2006/03/09 20:02:40 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-618) Make the client driver connection URL work when spaces are in the URL.

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-618?page=all ]
     
Kathey Marsden resolved DERBY-618:
----------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Checked into 10.1.2.4

'Date: Thu Mar  9 10:51:21 2006
New Revision: 384581

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384581&view=rev


> Make the client driver connection URL work when spaces are in the URL.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-618
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-618
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: Network Client
>     Versions: 10.1.1.0
>     Reporter: Trejkaz
>     Assignee: Deepa Remesh
>      Fix For: 10.1.2.4, 10.2.0.0, 10.1.3.0
>  Attachments: derby-618-10.1.diff, derby-618-10.1.status, derby-618-script.sql, derby-618-v1.diff, derby-618-v1.status, derby-618-v2.diff, derby-618-v2.status, derby-618.java
>
> At present, if I want to connect to a database on a Derby server which has a space in the path, there is no way to do it.
> This can be done with the embedded driver, and for consistency it would be good if it worked for the client driver in the same fashion.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Re: 10.1.2.3 vs 10.1.2.4

Posted by Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>.
On 3/9/06, Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> That's fine bumping the version number, but there has not been a
> 10.1.2.3 release. So I don't think 10.1.2.3 be in the release products
> section of Jira?

I had just been marking the release flag for the snapshot versions so
that it sorted nicely in the edit/comment screens. If you feel that
listing 10.1.2.3 in the released products section is deceptive, I'll
uncheck the flag. After looking around quite a bit, I can't actually
find anyplace where the release is described as a snapshot other than
the description field where I entered it in the admin screens, so I
can understand that position.

But, neither do I like the idea of JIRA filling up with dozens of
unreleased versions. But, I guess we can archive old versions once
there's really no activity around them, so I don't have particularly
strong feelings about that, either. E.g. we should probably archive
the 10.0 versions around the time 10.3 is released. Archiving the
version in JIRA just means it no longer shows up in the edit screens.

andrew

Re: 10.1.2.3 vs 10.1.2.4

Posted by Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org>.
Andrew McIntyre wrote:

> On 3/9/06, Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>>I'm up to date on my svn 10.1 client and it says 10.1.2.3 when running
>>sysinfo.
> 
> 
> Out of date release.properties somehow? It's definitely 10.1.2.4 in svn:

Yep, my mistake. Sorry.

>>I also saw Andrew mark a number of bugs as 10.1.2.4, and it seems the
>>10.1.2.3 moved into the release section of jira, but there has not been
>>a release.
> 
> 
> I thought we had agreed to bump the version number when we post a new snapshot?

That's fine bumping the version number, but there has not been a
10.1.2.3 release. So I don't think 10.1.2.3 be in the release products
section of Jira?

Dan.


Re: 10.1.2.3 vs 10.1.2.4

Posted by Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>.
On 3/9/06, Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I'm up to date on my svn 10.1 client and it says 10.1.2.3 when running
> sysinfo.

Out of date release.properties somehow? It's definitely 10.1.2.4 in svn:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/code/branches/10.1/tools/ant/properties/release.properties

> I also saw Andrew mark a number of bugs as 10.1.2.4, and it seems the
> 10.1.2.3 moved into the release section of jira, but there has not been
> a release.

I thought we had agreed to bump the version number when we post a new snapshot?

http://www.nabble.com/10.1.2-Release-status-page-t324110.html#a965280

andrew

10.1.2.3 vs 10.1.2.4

Posted by Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@apache.org>.
Kathey Marsden (JIRA) wrote:

>      [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-618?page=all ]
>      
> Kathey Marsden resolved DERBY-618:
> ----------------------------------
> 
>     Resolution: Fixed
> 
> Checked into 10.1.2.4

I'm up to date on my svn 10.1 client and it says 10.1.2.3 when running
sysinfo.

I also saw Andrew mark a number of bugs as 10.1.2.4, and it seems the
10.1.2.3 moved into the release section of jira, but there has not been
a release.

Confused,
Dan.