Re: geronimo.genesis

[David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>]

On Jan 31, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:

> Hi folks!
> 
> I'm currently trying to fix a xbean compilation error on java7 platforms.
> 
> Thus I stumbled over a very deep <parent> chain in our poms. There are 4 layers of geronimo.genesis.... parent poms. And the top of them still point to an apache-parent in the ancient version 6...
> 
> Is this something to clean up?
> And if so: who is cleaning this up? :)

If you're looking for volunteers I suspect you won't find any :)  If you are the volunteer, than I say go for it!

Certainly for something as tiny as xbean we don't need the complicated and outdated parent poms.


-David

Re: geronimo.genesis

[Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>]

Txs David!

I've now just updated all the poms stuff in genesis to latest versions.

Which also means that min mvn-3.x and java5 is required. But of course, target could still be java4. But who is using this anyway?

LieGrue,
strub




----- Original Message -----
> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Friday, February 1, 2013 12:54 AM
> Subject: Re: geronimo.genesis
> 
> 
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> 
>>  Hi folks!
>> 
>>  I'm currently trying to fix a xbean compilation error on java7 
> platforms.
>> 
>>  Thus I stumbled over a very deep <parent> chain in our poms. There 
> are 4 layers of geronimo.genesis.... parent poms. And the top of them still 
> point to an apache-parent in the ancient version 6...
>> 
>>  Is this something to clean up?
>>  And if so: who is cleaning this up? :)
> 
> If you're looking for volunteers I suspect you won't find any :)  If you 
> are the volunteer, than I say go for it!
> 
> Certainly for something as tiny as xbean we don't need the complicated and 
> outdated parent poms.
> 
> 
> -David
>