You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Karl Berry <ka...@freefriends.org> on 2005/02/02 13:55:41 UTC
svn com?
For the sake of being compatible with cvs except when there's a good
reason, how about making svn com an abbreviation for commit? Obviously
no big deal, but my fingers miss it.
Thanks,
karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn com?
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
"Brian W. Fitzpatrick" <fi...@collab.net> writes:
> I'd really rather that we didn't. We've already got 'ci', which is
> pretty short (I know it's not 'com', and I really do sympathize with
> Karl Berry's plight), but I fear that this will open the floodgates for
> incrementally including the gazillion other CVS shortcuts available.
> Here's the list of CVS commands that have one or more "aliases", and I
> really don't want to approach this level of insanity.
>
> CVS commands and their aliases:
>
> [...]
Wow. Thanks for doing the homework.
Yes, seeing that list, I think I agree with you, and beg Karl Berry's
forgiveness.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn com?
Posted by Max Bowsher <ma...@ukf.net>.
Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 13:43, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>> karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) writes:
>>> For the sake of being compatible with cvs except when there's a good
>>> reason, how about making svn com an abbreviation for commit? Obviously
>>> no big deal, but my fingers miss it.
>>
>> Developers: I'm tempted to just do it. It seems doubtful we'd ever
>> allocate 'com' to something *else*, given that it already means commit
>> in CVS.
>>
>> Any objections?
>
> I'd really rather that we didn't. We've already got 'ci', which is
> pretty short (I know it's not 'com', and I really do sympathize with
> Karl Berry's plight), but I fear that this will open the floodgates for
> incrementally including the gazillion other CVS shortcuts available.
> Here's the list of CVS commands that have one or more "aliases", and I
> really don't want to approach this level of insanity.
>
> CVS commands and their aliases:
>
> "add", "ad", "new"
> "admin", "adm", "rcs"
> "annotate", "ann"
> "checkout", "co", "get"
> "commit", "ci", "com"
> "diff", "di", "dif"
> "export", "exp", "ex"
> "history", "hi", "his"
> "import", "im", "imp"
> "log", "lo"
> "login", "logon", "lgn"
> "rannotate","rann", "ra"
> "rdiff", "patch", "pa"
> "release", "re", "rel"
> "remove", "rm", "delete"
> "rlog", "rl"
> "rtag", "rt", "rfreeze"
> "status", "st", "stat"
> "tag", "ta", "freeze"
> "update", "up", "upd"
> "version", "ve", "ver"
>
> -Fitz
Yuck! I didn't realize CVS was quite so ridiculously over-aliased!
Perhaps Karl Berry would be interested in the programmable bash completion?
(Assuming, of course, he uses bash).
Max.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn com?
Posted by "Brian W. Fitzpatrick" <fi...@collab.net>.
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 13:43, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) writes:
> > For the sake of being compatible with cvs except when there's a good
> > reason, how about making svn com an abbreviation for commit? Obviously
> > no big deal, but my fingers miss it.
>
> Developers: I'm tempted to just do it. It seems doubtful we'd ever
> allocate 'com' to something *else*, given that it already means commit
> in CVS.
>
> Any objections?
I'd really rather that we didn't. We've already got 'ci', which is
pretty short (I know it's not 'com', and I really do sympathize with
Karl Berry's plight), but I fear that this will open the floodgates for
incrementally including the gazillion other CVS shortcuts available.
Here's the list of CVS commands that have one or more "aliases", and I
really don't want to approach this level of insanity.
CVS commands and their aliases:
"add", "ad", "new"
"admin", "adm", "rcs"
"annotate", "ann"
"checkout", "co", "get"
"commit", "ci", "com"
"diff", "di", "dif"
"export", "exp", "ex"
"history", "hi", "his"
"import", "im", "imp"
"log", "lo"
"login", "logon", "lgn"
"rannotate","rann", "ra"
"rdiff", "patch", "pa"
"release", "re", "rel"
"remove", "rm", "delete"
"rlog", "rl"
"rtag", "rt", "rfreeze"
"status", "st", "stat"
"tag", "ta", "freeze"
"update", "up", "upd"
"version", "ve", "ver"
-Fitz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn com?
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) writes:
> For the sake of being compatible with cvs except when there's a good
> reason, how about making svn com an abbreviation for commit? Obviously
> no big deal, but my fingers miss it.
Developers: I'm tempted to just do it. It seems doubtful we'd ever
allocate 'com' to something *else*, given that it already means commit
in CVS.
Any objections?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org