You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xmlrpc-dev@ws.apache.org by Martin Poeschl <mp...@marmot.at> on 2002/03/14 02:55:47 UTC
[vote] coding conventions
i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project, but first we have to decide
which code conventions we should use ...
i think there are 2 options:
* turbine code conventions (http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html)
* sun code conventions (http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html)
+1 for using turbine conventions
martin
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
Martin Poeschl <mp...@marmot.at> writes:
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project,
> but first we have to decide which code conventions we should use ...
>
> i think there are 2 options:
>
> * turbine code conventions (http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html)
>
> * sun code conventions (http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html)
>
>
> +1 for using turbine conventions
+1 for using turbine's.
- Dan
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Hannes Wallnöfer <ha...@helma.at>.
Martin Poeschl wrote:
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project,
> but first we have to decide which code conventions we should use ...
>
> i think there are 2 options:
>
> * turbine code conventions
> (http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html)
>
> * sun code conventions
> (http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html)
>
>
> +1 for using turbine conventions
>
> martin
+0 - I haven't worked with the Turbine style of bracketing yet, but I
don't have any aversion against it and it may be a good occasion to try
something new.
Hannes
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Jon Scott Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com>.
on 3/13/02 6:06 PM, "Jason van Zyl" <jv...@zenplex.com> wrote:
> +1 for turbine
>
+1 for turbine
-jon
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Jon Scott Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com>.
on 3/13/02 6:06 PM, "Jason van Zyl" <jv...@zenplex.com> wrote:
> +1 for turbine
>
+1 for turbine
-jon
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 20:55, Martin Poeschl wrote:
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project, but first we have to decide
> which code conventions we should use ...
>
> i think there are 2 options:
>
> * turbine code conventions (http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html)
>
> * sun code conventions (http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html)
>
>
> +1 for using turbine conventions
+1 for turbine
> martin
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
Martin Poeschl <mp...@marmot.at> writes:
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project,
> but first we have to decide which code conventions we should use ...
>
> i think there are 2 options:
>
> * turbine code conventions (http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html)
>
> * sun code conventions (http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html)
>
>
> +1 for using turbine conventions
+1 for using turbine's.
- Dan
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 20:55, Martin Poeschl wrote:
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project, but first we have to decide
> which code conventions we should use ...
>
> i think there are 2 options:
>
> * turbine code conventions (http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html)
>
> * sun code conventions (http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html)
>
>
> +1 for using turbine conventions
+1 for turbine
> martin
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by John Wilson <tu...@wilson.co.uk>.
----- Original Message -----
[snip]
> why is MinML in the xml-rpc repo??
>
Because it is the default XML parser for Apache XML-RPC.
> the MinML version is 1.6 .. there is a 1.7 version available ..
> what's the difference?
> should we upgrade?
The 1.7 version contains nothing new of relevance to XML-RPC (the changes
involve mixed content which XM-RPC, thankfully, does not use). The 1.8
version will have changes which involve encoding which will be relevant to
XML-RPC.
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co.uk
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by John Wilson <tu...@wilson.co.uk>.
----- Original Message -----
[snip]
> why is MinML in the xml-rpc repo??
>
Because it is the default XML parser for Apache XML-RPC.
> the MinML version is 1.6 .. there is a 1.7 version available ..
> what's the difference?
> should we upgrade?
The 1.7 version contains nothing new of relevance to XML-RPC (the changes
involve mixed content which XM-RPC, thankfully, does not use). The 1.8
version will have changes which involve encoding which will be relevant to
XML-RPC.
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co.uk
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Martin Poeschl <mp...@marmot.at>.
John Wilson wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Scott Stevens" <jo...@latchkey.com>
> To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [vote] coding conventions
>
>
>
>>on 3/14/02 11:16 AM, "John Wilson" <tu...@wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>+1 for the Sun conventions.
>>
>>Turbine's conventions extend the Sun conventions (which you don't even
>>follow in your own code). :-)
>
>
> The turbine conventions extend and embrace the Sun conventions (changing the
> bracketing layout, for example).
>
> My own coding conventions are not the Sun conventions. Mine includes the
> obsessive use of final, the use of this to always qualify references to
> class fields and a bunch of idiosyncrasies I'm probably not aware of and
> have no wish to inflict on others. This vote is not on the coding
> conventions used by uk.co.wilson.* packages.
why is MinML in the xml-rpc repo??
the MinML version is 1.6 .. there is a 1.7 version available ..
what's the difference?
should we upgrade?
the majority of developers voted for the turbine conventions. i'll document the decision on the site
and do the reformatting next week (after the turbine 2.2b1 release)
if there's anyone working on some files and want to prevent merging problems, please send me a note.
martin
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Martin Poeschl <mp...@marmot.at>.
John Wilson wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Scott Stevens" <jo...@latchkey.com>
> To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [vote] coding conventions
>
>
>
>>on 3/14/02 11:16 AM, "John Wilson" <tu...@wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>+1 for the Sun conventions.
>>
>>Turbine's conventions extend the Sun conventions (which you don't even
>>follow in your own code). :-)
>
>
> The turbine conventions extend and embrace the Sun conventions (changing the
> bracketing layout, for example).
>
> My own coding conventions are not the Sun conventions. Mine includes the
> obsessive use of final, the use of this to always qualify references to
> class fields and a bunch of idiosyncrasies I'm probably not aware of and
> have no wish to inflict on others. This vote is not on the coding
> conventions used by uk.co.wilson.* packages.
why is MinML in the xml-rpc repo??
the MinML version is 1.6 .. there is a 1.7 version available ..
what's the difference?
should we upgrade?
the majority of developers voted for the turbine conventions. i'll document the decision on the site
and do the reformatting next week (after the turbine 2.2b1 release)
if there's anyone working on some files and want to prevent merging problems, please send me a note.
martin
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Jon Scott Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com>.
on 3/14/02 11:43 AM, "John Wilson" <tu...@wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> My own coding conventions are not the Sun conventions. Mine includes the
> obsessive use of final, the use of this to always qualify references to
> class fields and a bunch of idiosyncrasies I'm probably not aware of and
> have no wish to inflict on others.
I don't think we were referring to that type of coding conventions (I don't
mind using final when it makes sense), but more concerned with the
formatting of the code in the .java file.
-jon
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Jon Scott Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com>.
on 3/14/02 11:43 AM, "John Wilson" <tu...@wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> My own coding conventions are not the Sun conventions. Mine includes the
> obsessive use of final, the use of this to always qualify references to
> class fields and a bunch of idiosyncrasies I'm probably not aware of and
> have no wish to inflict on others.
I don't think we were referring to that type of coding conventions (I don't
mind using final when it makes sense), but more concerned with the
formatting of the code in the .java file.
-jon
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by John Wilson <tu...@wilson.co.uk>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Scott Stevens" <jo...@latchkey.com>
To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [vote] coding conventions
> on 3/14/02 11:16 AM, "John Wilson" <tu...@wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > +1 for the Sun conventions.
>
> Turbine's conventions extend the Sun conventions (which you don't even
> follow in your own code). :-)
The turbine conventions extend and embrace the Sun conventions (changing the
bracketing layout, for example).
My own coding conventions are not the Sun conventions. Mine includes the
obsessive use of final, the use of this to always qualify references to
class fields and a bunch of idiosyncrasies I'm probably not aware of and
have no wish to inflict on others. This vote is not on the coding
conventions used by uk.co.wilson.* packages.
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co.uk
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by John Wilson <tu...@wilson.co.uk>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Scott Stevens" <jo...@latchkey.com>
To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [vote] coding conventions
> on 3/14/02 11:16 AM, "John Wilson" <tu...@wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > +1 for the Sun conventions.
>
> Turbine's conventions extend the Sun conventions (which you don't even
> follow in your own code). :-)
The turbine conventions extend and embrace the Sun conventions (changing the
bracketing layout, for example).
My own coding conventions are not the Sun conventions. Mine includes the
obsessive use of final, the use of this to always qualify references to
class fields and a bunch of idiosyncrasies I'm probably not aware of and
have no wish to inflict on others. This vote is not on the coding
conventions used by uk.co.wilson.* packages.
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co.uk
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Jon Scott Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com>.
on 3/14/02 11:16 AM, "John Wilson" <tu...@wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> +1 for the Sun conventions.
Turbine's conventions extend the Sun conventions (which you don't even
follow in your own code). :-)
-jon
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Jon Scott Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com>.
on 3/14/02 11:16 AM, "John Wilson" <tu...@wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> +1 for the Sun conventions.
Turbine's conventions extend the Sun conventions (which you don't even
follow in your own code). :-)
-jon
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by John Wilson <tu...@wilson.co.uk>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Poeschl" <mp...@marmot.at>
To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:55 AM
Subject: [vote] coding conventions
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project, but
first we have to decide
> which code conventions we should use ...
>
> i think there are 2 options:
>
> * turbine code conventions
(http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html)
>
> * sun code conventions
(http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html)
>
>
> +1 for using turbine conventions
>
> martin
+1 for the Sun conventions.
;)
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co.uk
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by Hannes Wallnöfer <ha...@helma.at>.
Martin Poeschl wrote:
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project,
> but first we have to decide which code conventions we should use ...
>
> i think there are 2 options:
>
> * turbine code conventions
> (http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html)
>
> * sun code conventions
> (http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html)
>
>
> +1 for using turbine conventions
>
> martin
+0 - I haven't worked with the Turbine style of bracketing yet, but I
don't have any aversion against it and it may be a good occasion to try
something new.
Hannes
Re: [vote] coding conventions
Posted by John Wilson <tu...@wilson.co.uk>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Poeschl" <mp...@marmot.at>
To: <rp...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:55 AM
Subject: [vote] coding conventions
> i would like to do a code and javadoc cleanup for the whole project, but
first we have to decide
> which code conventions we should use ...
>
> i think there are 2 options:
>
> * turbine code conventions
(http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html)
>
> * sun code conventions
(http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html)
>
>
> +1 for using turbine conventions
>
> martin
+1 for the Sun conventions.
;)
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co.uk