You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@buildr.apache.org by "Antoine Toulme (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/10/01 01:09:23 UTC

[jira] Updated: (BUILDR-325) Let packages be defined with the same type but a different classifier

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Antoine Toulme updated BUILDR-325:
----------------------------------

    Attachment: buildrpatch

Attached a patch that just does this.

> Let packages be defined with the same type but a different classifier
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BUILDR-325
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-325
>             Project: Buildr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Packaging
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.4
>            Reporter: Antoine Toulme
>         Attachments: buildrpatch
>
>
> The current code in package.rb does this:
> package = (no_options && packages.detect { |pkg| pkg.type == spec[:type] ||
>           packages.find { |pkg| pkg.name == file_name }                             ||
>           packager.call(file_name)
> ie, if you define two packages that use the :zip type, only the first one will be taken into account.
> I happen to work on Eclipse features, in which both the source and original features work with the same type, but have different classifiers.
> So I'd like the code to do this instead:
> package = (no_options && packages.detect { |pkg| pkg.type == spec[:type] && 
>                   (spec[:classifier].nil? || pkg.classifier == spec[:classifier])}) ||
>           packages.find { |pkg| pkg.name == file_name }                             ||
>           packager.call(file_name)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.