You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@buildr.apache.org by "Antoine Toulme (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/10/01 01:09:23 UTC
[jira] Updated: (BUILDR-325) Let packages be defined with the same
type but a different classifier
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Antoine Toulme updated BUILDR-325:
----------------------------------
Attachment: buildrpatch
Attached a patch that just does this.
> Let packages be defined with the same type but a different classifier
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BUILDR-325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-325
> Project: Buildr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Packaging
> Affects Versions: 1.3.4
> Reporter: Antoine Toulme
> Attachments: buildrpatch
>
>
> The current code in package.rb does this:
> package = (no_options && packages.detect { |pkg| pkg.type == spec[:type] ||
> packages.find { |pkg| pkg.name == file_name } ||
> packager.call(file_name)
> ie, if you define two packages that use the :zip type, only the first one will be taken into account.
> I happen to work on Eclipse features, in which both the source and original features work with the same type, but have different classifiers.
> So I'd like the code to do this instead:
> package = (no_options && packages.detect { |pkg| pkg.type == spec[:type] &&
> (spec[:classifier].nil? || pkg.classifier == spec[:classifier])}) ||
> packages.find { |pkg| pkg.name == file_name } ||
> packager.call(file_name)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.