You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@fineract.apache.org by Muellners ApS <an...@muellners.org> on 2021/10/14 09:40:00 UTC
[VOTE] Release of White Paper version 1 public copy
White Paper: Need for an inclusive decentralized governance in Apache
Fineract Project; Best Practices for Open Source Projects of Apache
Software Foundation (v1)
Muellners Foundation <https://muellners.org>, a non-profit, has been
working on this white paper, based on its findings from public facing
records of Apache Fineract Project.
I am one of the sponsors/Advisory Board members of the Foundation. I am
posting this thread here as an individual contributor to this project as I
feel this report is relevant to Banks, fintechs who adopt this platform for
its open source & decentralised product engineering benefits. Developers,
consultants, students, researchers, all of you, who are associated with
this project.
This report is based on an Observation Report by Muellners
Foundation,(frivillig forening) a voluntary association based in
Copenhagen, Denmark. The Foundation works towards creating
inclusive practices in open source communities.
The Observation report highlights:
1. Best Practices for private "for profit" startups in the Fineract
community's project management.
2. Best practices for individual contributors affiliated with "for profit"
private startups in the Fineract community’s project governance.
We are now voting and will close the vote within the next 72 hours. Read
more about how we collaborate in this community via the Apache way.
<https://community.apache.org/committers/consensusBuilding.html>
Subject of the vote is:
1. Public Release of the white paper to this public mailing list.
Casting Your Vote
The notation used in voting is:
- +1 Yes, I agree
- 0 I have no strong opinion
- -1 I object on the following grounds
If you object you must support your objection and provide an alternative
course of action that you are willing and able to implement (where
appropriate).
Read more on how this community's decision making functions here
<https://community.apache.org/committers/> and other public facing content
on Apache's website, including this project's documentation.
--
Ankit
Managing Partner
Muellners Group, Denmark but a human being here!
Impressum- Muellners® Inc; Copenhagen, Denmark CVR: 41548304;
New Delhi, India CIN: U72900DL2019PTC344870; Foundation EU CVR:41008407
This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy.
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
--
Ankit
Managing Partner
Muellners Inc
This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy.
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
Re: [VOTE] Release of White Paper version 1 public copy
Posted by Awasum Yannick <aw...@apache.org>.
Hi All,
*The Apache Fineract PMC disagrees and disavows the contents of this
message. The PMC believes the email above to be based upon an unfounded and
uninformed set of beliefs. We have no further reply to this matter.*
Thanks.
Awasum Yannick.
PMC Chair, Apache Fineract.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:04 PM Muellners ApS <an...@muellners.org> wrote:
> Awasum, PMC's disagreement is acceptable but not fair. PMC is supposed to
> represent the community.
>
> Please back statements with facts and data wherever adjectives are used by
> you, e.g What set of uninformed and unfounded beliefs do you see in this
> thread?
>
> I reckon if you could contribute to this by facilitating a safe vote
> instead of disavowing the message & shooting the messenger.
> I again request you to try to find a mechanism or inform the community of
> how you would like to do this? If you have no interest in listening then
> let us all know here.
> Let the community participate in this vote now and collect the feedback.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:18 PM Awasum Yannick <aw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:40 AM Muellners ApS <an...@muellners.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> White Paper: Need for an inclusive decentralized governance in Apache
>>> Fineract Project; Best Practices for Open Source Projects of Apache
>>> Software Foundation (v1)
>>>
>>> Muellners Foundation <https://muellners.org>, a non-profit, has been
>>> working on this white paper, based on its findings from public facing
>>> records of Apache Fineract Project.
>>>
>>> I am one of the sponsors/Advisory Board members of the Foundation. I am
>>> posting this thread here as an individual contributor to this project as I
>>> feel this report is relevant to Banks, fintechs who adopt this platform for
>>> its open source & decentralised product engineering benefits. Developers,
>>> consultants, students, researchers, all of you, who are associated with
>>> this project.
>>>
>>> This report is based on an Observation Report by Muellners
>>> Foundation,(frivillig forening) a voluntary association based in
>>> Copenhagen, Denmark. The Foundation works towards creating
>>> inclusive practices in open source communities.
>>> The Observation report highlights:
>>> 1. Best Practices for private "for profit" startups in the Fineract
>>> community's project management.
>>> 2. Best practices for individual contributors affiliated with "for
>>> profit" private startups in the Fineract community’s project governance.
>>>
>>> We are now voting and will close the vote within the next 72 hours. Read
>>> more about how we collaborate in this community via the Apache way.
>>> <https://community.apache.org/committers/consensusBuilding.html>
>>>
>>> Subject of the vote is:
>>> 1. Public Release of the white paper to this public mailing list.
>>>
>>> Casting Your Vote
>>>
>>> The notation used in voting is:
>>>
>>> - +1 Yes, I agree
>>> - 0 I have no strong opinion
>>> - -1 I object on the following grounds
>>>
>>> If you object you must support your objection and provide an alternative
>>> course of action that you are willing and able to implement (where
>>> appropriate).
>>>
>>> Read more on how this community's decision making functions here
>>> <https://community.apache.org/committers/> and other public facing
>>> content on Apache's website, including this project's documentation.
>>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> *The Apache Fineract PMC disagrees and disavows the contents of this
>> message. The PMC believes the email above to be based upon an unfounded and
>> uninformed set of beliefs. We have no further reply to this matter.*
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Awasum Yannick.
>> PMC Chair, Apache Fineract.
>>
>>
>
> --
> Ankit
> Managing Partner
> Muellners ApS, Denmark
>
> Impressum- Muellners® Inc; Copenhagen, Denmark CVR: 41548304;
> New Delhi, India CIN: U72900DL2019PTC344870; Foundation EU CVR:41008407
>
> This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy.
> The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
> may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
> this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
> the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
> attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
> of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
> prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
> monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
> compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
> are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
> intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
> to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of White Paper version 1 public copy
Posted by Muellners ApS <an...@muellners.org>.
Awasum, PMC's disagreement is acceptable but not fair. PMC is supposed to
represent the community.
Please back statements with facts and data wherever adjectives are used by
you, e.g What set of uninformed and unfounded beliefs do you see in this
thread?
I reckon if you could contribute to this by facilitating a safe vote
instead of disavowing the message & shooting the messenger.
I again request you to try to find a mechanism or inform the community of
how you would like to do this? If you have no interest in listening then
let us all know here.
Let the community participate in this vote now and collect the feedback.
Thanks
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:18 PM Awasum Yannick <aw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:40 AM Muellners ApS <an...@muellners.org>
> wrote:
>
>> White Paper: Need for an inclusive decentralized governance in Apache
>> Fineract Project; Best Practices for Open Source Projects of Apache
>> Software Foundation (v1)
>>
>> Muellners Foundation <https://muellners.org>, a non-profit, has been
>> working on this white paper, based on its findings from public facing
>> records of Apache Fineract Project.
>>
>> I am one of the sponsors/Advisory Board members of the Foundation. I am
>> posting this thread here as an individual contributor to this project as I
>> feel this report is relevant to Banks, fintechs who adopt this platform for
>> its open source & decentralised product engineering benefits. Developers,
>> consultants, students, researchers, all of you, who are associated with
>> this project.
>>
>> This report is based on an Observation Report by Muellners
>> Foundation,(frivillig forening) a voluntary association based in
>> Copenhagen, Denmark. The Foundation works towards creating
>> inclusive practices in open source communities.
>> The Observation report highlights:
>> 1. Best Practices for private "for profit" startups in the Fineract
>> community's project management.
>> 2. Best practices for individual contributors affiliated with "for
>> profit" private startups in the Fineract community’s project governance.
>>
>> We are now voting and will close the vote within the next 72 hours. Read
>> more about how we collaborate in this community via the Apache way.
>> <https://community.apache.org/committers/consensusBuilding.html>
>>
>> Subject of the vote is:
>> 1. Public Release of the white paper to this public mailing list.
>>
>> Casting Your Vote
>>
>> The notation used in voting is:
>>
>> - +1 Yes, I agree
>> - 0 I have no strong opinion
>> - -1 I object on the following grounds
>>
>> If you object you must support your objection and provide an alternative
>> course of action that you are willing and able to implement (where
>> appropriate).
>>
>> Read more on how this community's decision making functions here
>> <https://community.apache.org/committers/> and other public facing
>> content on Apache's website, including this project's documentation.
>>
>
> Hi All,
>
> *The Apache Fineract PMC disagrees and disavows the contents of this
> message. The PMC believes the email above to be based upon an unfounded and
> uninformed set of beliefs. We have no further reply to this matter.*
>
>
> Thanks.
> Awasum Yannick.
> PMC Chair, Apache Fineract.
>
>
--
Ankit
Managing Partner
Muellners ApS, Denmark
Impressum- Muellners® Inc; Copenhagen, Denmark CVR: 41548304;
New Delhi, India CIN: U72900DL2019PTC344870; Foundation EU CVR:41008407
This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy.
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
Re: [VOTE] Release of White Paper version 1 public copy
Posted by Awasum Yannick <aw...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:40 AM Muellners ApS <an...@muellners.org> wrote:
> White Paper: Need for an inclusive decentralized governance in Apache
> Fineract Project; Best Practices for Open Source Projects of Apache
> Software Foundation (v1)
>
> Muellners Foundation <https://muellners.org>, a non-profit, has been
> working on this white paper, based on its findings from public facing
> records of Apache Fineract Project.
>
> I am one of the sponsors/Advisory Board members of the Foundation. I am
> posting this thread here as an individual contributor to this project as I
> feel this report is relevant to Banks, fintechs who adopt this platform for
> its open source & decentralised product engineering benefits. Developers,
> consultants, students, researchers, all of you, who are associated with
> this project.
>
> This report is based on an Observation Report by Muellners
> Foundation,(frivillig forening) a voluntary association based in
> Copenhagen, Denmark. The Foundation works towards creating
> inclusive practices in open source communities.
> The Observation report highlights:
> 1. Best Practices for private "for profit" startups in the Fineract
> community's project management.
> 2. Best practices for individual contributors affiliated with "for profit"
> private startups in the Fineract community’s project governance.
>
> We are now voting and will close the vote within the next 72 hours. Read
> more about how we collaborate in this community via the Apache way.
> <https://community.apache.org/committers/consensusBuilding.html>
>
> Subject of the vote is:
> 1. Public Release of the white paper to this public mailing list.
>
> Casting Your Vote
>
> The notation used in voting is:
>
> - +1 Yes, I agree
> - 0 I have no strong opinion
> - -1 I object on the following grounds
>
> If you object you must support your objection and provide an alternative
> course of action that you are willing and able to implement (where
> appropriate).
>
> Read more on how this community's decision making functions here
> <https://community.apache.org/committers/> and other public facing
> content on Apache's website, including this project's documentation.
>
Hi All,
*The Apache Fineract PMC disagrees and disavows the contents of this
message. The PMC believes the email above to be based upon an unfounded and
uninformed set of beliefs. We have no further reply to this matter.*
Thanks.
Awasum Yannick.
PMC Chair, Apache Fineract.
Re: [VOTE] Release of White Paper version 1 public copy
Posted by Saransh Sharma <sa...@muellners.org>.
Plus one ☝️
On Thursday, October 14, 2021, Muellners ApS <an...@muellners.org> wrote:
> White Paper: Need for an inclusive decentralized governance in Apache
> Fineract Project; Best Practices for Open Source Projects of Apache
> Software Foundation (v1)
>
> Muellners Foundation <https://muellners.org>, a non-profit, has been
> working on this white paper, based on its findings from public facing
> records of Apache Fineract Project.
>
> I am one of the sponsors/Advisory Board members of the Foundation. I am
> posting this thread here as an individual contributor to this project as I
> feel this report is relevant to Banks, fintechs who adopt this platform for
> its open source & decentralised product engineering benefits. Developers,
> consultants, students, researchers, all of you, who are associated with
> this project.
>
> This report is based on an Observation Report by Muellners
> Foundation,(frivillig forening) a voluntary association based in
> Copenhagen, Denmark. The Foundation works towards creating
> inclusive practices in open source communities.
> The Observation report highlights:
> 1. Best Practices for private "for profit" startups in the Fineract
> community's project management.
> 2. Best practices for individual contributors affiliated with "for profit"
> private startups in the Fineract community’s project governance.
>
> We are now voting and will close the vote within the next 72 hours. Read
> more about how we collaborate in this community via the Apache way.
> <https://community.apache.org/committers/consensusBuilding.html>
>
> Subject of the vote is:
> 1. Public Release of the white paper to this public mailing list.
>
> Casting Your Vote
>
> The notation used in voting is:
>
> - +1 Yes, I agree
> - 0 I have no strong opinion
> - -1 I object on the following grounds
>
> If you object you must support your objection and provide an alternative
> course of action that you are willing and able to implement (where
> appropriate).
>
> Read more on how this community's decision making functions here
> <https://community.apache.org/committers/> and other public facing
> content on Apache's website, including this project's documentation.
> --
> Ankit
> Managing Partner
> Muellners Group, Denmark but a human being here!
>
> Impressum- Muellners® Inc; Copenhagen, Denmark CVR: 41548304;
> New Delhi, India CIN: U72900DL2019PTC344870; Foundation EU CVR:41008407
>
> This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy.
> The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
> may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
> this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
> the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
> attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
> of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
> prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
> monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
> compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
> are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
> intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
> to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
> --
> Ankit
> Managing Partner
> Muellners Inc
>
> This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy.
> The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
> may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
> disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
> this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
> the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
> attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
> of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
> prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
> monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
> compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
> are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
> intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
> to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
>
--
Saransh Sharma
Research Partner
Sent from my phone
This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy.
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert
the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any
attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents
of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be
monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure
compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails
are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be
intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed
to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.