You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by swclhard <cl...@gmx.de> on 2018/03/07 13:42:42 UTC
Use Apache ActiveMQ Artemis JDBC Persistence for production
Hi all,
Latest documentation is still containing a warning:
/
The Apache ActiveMQ Artemis JDBC persistence store is under development and
is included for evaluation purposes./
Is it still true?
Why is it just for evaluation?
Is it scheduled to be resolved soon? If yes, in which version it will be
resolved?
The list of supported database seems to be obsolete, because I saw that
there are already implementations for derby and oracle persistence, which
are not mentioned in the documentation.
Documentation also contains:
/Address full policy Paging is currently not supported./
Does it mean, we will run out of memory, if to much messages are in the
database or is it only not possible to set a max size limit for a specific
queue?
We need to enqueue and dequeue text messages with up to 5 MB. We are not
using any message selectors or other features like topics.
I already tried to get answer from end users, but I did not get any reply.
Maybe someone of you can answer my questions.
Please let me know, if this is the wrong place for that kind of question and
forward me to the right location.
Best Regards
Clemens
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
Use Apache ActiveMQ Artemis JDBC Persistence for production
Posted by Benjamin Graf <be...@gmx.net>.
Hi Clemens,
I would still call it experimental. IMHO ARTEMIS-545 still needs to be
addressed especially for EAP where DS pools are managed.
@all: Does performance test cases exist for JDBC backend like for
regular journal?
Regards,
Benjamin
Am 20.03.2018 um 16:54 schrieb Andy Taylor:
> If your using EAP I would raise this thru the Red Hat support channels.
>
> On 20 March 2018 at 09:26, swclhard <cl...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> So does anybody know about the state of JDBC persistence for Artemis? Is it
>> still experimental like written in the documentation?
>>
>> We have analyzed EAP 7.1 with Artemis. Here we have explicit support only
>> for Oracle12C and no warning in the documentation.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Clemens
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-
>> f2368404.html
>>
Re: Use Apache ActiveMQ Artemis JDBC Persistence for production
Posted by Andy Taylor <an...@gmail.com>.
If your using EAP I would raise this thru the Red Hat support channels.
On 20 March 2018 at 09:26, swclhard <cl...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So does anybody know about the state of JDBC persistence for Artemis? Is it
> still experimental like written in the documentation?
>
> We have analyzed EAP 7.1 with Artemis. Here we have explicit support only
> for Oracle12C and no warning in the documentation.
>
> Best Regards
> Clemens
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-
> f2368404.html
>
Re: Use Apache ActiveMQ Artemis JDBC Persistence for production
Posted by swclhard <cl...@gmx.de>.
Hi all,
So does anybody know about the state of JDBC persistence for Artemis? Is it
still experimental like written in the documentation?
We have analyzed EAP 7.1 with Artemis. Here we have explicit support only
for Oracle12C and no warning in the documentation.
Best Regards
Clemens
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html