Re: dependencies: cpan vs. runtime?

[LA Walsh <sa...@tlinx.org>]

Bonjour,

    No -- don't really need them.  Just trying to trace down
why, with another upgrade, the my emails have gone from
being tagged by SA to not being tagged.  

I didn't know if the missing modules were contributing
to the problem.  I had noted earlier emails of some people
having problems with SPF defaulting to "on" and their
emailers not entirely conforming.

    Ideally, IMO, the upgrade should set new defaults to
most closely mimic the behavior of the old configuration.
Some varient of a "lint" report could show options that
are not in their default configuration for a given
release (a feature enhancement, I know).

    BTW -- how difficult would it be to put a "stable"
release of razor2 and/or pyzor into CPAN periodically
so they can be pulled down and used via the same
method as other modules?

Merci et Thanks,
Linda

mouss a écrit:

> LA Walsh  :
>
>> Idiot me, upgraded to 3.1 when barely had 3.0.4 working (shooting
>> self in foot).
>>
>> Now getting no markup again.
>>
>> --lint is mum as to any problems, but debug has several "thoughts"
>> on the matter.  I was wondering what was required for SA to run
>> and whether or not it would be helpful to "pre-req'ed" some of
>> them in CPAN if they are needed at runtime?
>
>
> No real issue here. check if you really need those.
>
>>
>> Debug spoketh:
>>
>>
>> [24022] dbg: diag: module not installed: Mail::SPF::Query ('require' 
>> failed)
>> [24022] dbg: diag: module not installed: IP::Country::Fast ('require' 
>> failed)
>> [24022] dbg: diag: module not installed: Razor2::Client::Agent 
>> ('require' failed
>> )
>> [24022] dbg: diag: module not installed: Net::Ident ('require' failed)
>
>
>> [24022] dbg: diag: module not installed: IO::Socket::INET6 ('require' 
>> failed)
>> [24022] dbg: diag: module not installed: IO::Socket::SSL ('require' 
>> failed)
>>
>