You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com> on 2007/09/10 14:07:18 UTC

org.apache.cxf.databinding.source.AbstractDataBinding.java

Why doesn't this implement DataBinding? If it's in the source binding,
why is it used by Jaxb?

 

I want to add an optional method to DataBinding, and so I want an
AbstractDataBinding class to supply the default, and I'm wondering if
this is already it. Should I move it to the same package as DataBinding,
or is there a longer story?

RE: org.apache.cxf.databinding.source.AbstractDataBinding.java

Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com>.

I now see that this is:

a) in the source package
b) not used by the source databinding (well, at least, not extended by
it)
c) used by the Jaxb binding.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bim2007@basistech.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 8:07 AM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: org.apache.cxf.databinding.source.AbstractDataBinding.java
> 
> Why doesn't this implement DataBinding? If it's in the source binding,
> why is it used by Jaxb?
> 
> 
> 
> I want to add an optional method to DataBinding, and so I want an
> AbstractDataBinding class to supply the default, and I'm wondering if
> this is already it. Should I move it to the same package as
DataBinding,
> or is there a longer story?