You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by ant elder <an...@gmail.com> on 2007/08/16 12:57:28 UTC
Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Hi SCA/OSGi-ers,
Just bringing this up again to see if there is any interesting in moving
this along still. We've been talking about having a Tuscany 1.0 release in a
couple of months, be great if we could have a good OSGi story for that. Also
the Apache Felix 1.0 release is out now and the existing
implemention.osgicode has been moved off SNAPSHOTs to use Felix
1.0 so we can now include that in releases (though i think one of the itests
still has an intermittent failure so would be good to fix that as well).
...ant
On 6/29/07, Hawkins, Joel <Jo...@compuware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi SCA/OSGi-ers.
>
> I did some initial work back during the M2 days (working with Nicole) to
> host Tuscany in an Equinox runtime. It looks like I may have some time
> to re-engage during the next few months, so is there anything in
> particular that I could be looking at to help move the OSGi efforts
> ahead? Like Bill and Raymond below, my primary interest is in seeing
> OSGi used as a container for hosting SCA.
>
> Cheers,
> Joel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto:rajinisivaram@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
> To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
>
> Sebastien,
>
> Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging of SCA
> contributions as OSGi bundles, once the work on implementation.osgi is
> complete.
>
>
> Thank you...
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On 6/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Bill Barnhill wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As I may have mentioned earlier I also have been working on the
> SCA-OSGi
> > > integration, but from the third aspect that Raymond mentions, using
> > > OSGi as
> > > an underlying technology for an SCA container providing an extension
> > > mechanism, dependency resolution and service registry capabilities.
> > >
> > > I think my work would dovetail nicely with the work Rajini and
> Graham
> > > have
> > > been doing. Would it be possible to create an osgi directory under
> > > contrib
> > > with a subdir under that for each of our efforts (host, binding,
> > > implementation)
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> >
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > That sounds like a good idea. Tuscany modules are not that different
> > from OSGI bundles, I think it wouldn't be too difficult to package
> them
> > as actual bundles, and come up with a variation of host-embedded that
> > will load them as such, allowing for some isolation and better
> > jar/bundle dependency management.
> >
> > Do you have the structure you need with sca/modules/host-osgi? Do you
> > have code that we can look at?
> >
> > Any questions or issues that we can help with?
> >
> > On a different, but related subject, has anybody started on supporting
> > the package of (application) SCA contributions (as defined by the SCA
> > assembly spec) as OSGI bundles?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Sebastien
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It
> contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
> addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose
> it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately
> and then destroy it.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Posted by Rajini Sivaram <ra...@googlemail.com>.
Ant,
Thank you for applying the patch. I will be happy to see implementation-osgi
in the release.
Thank you...
Regards,
Rajini
On 8/23/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This itest has been fixed now with TUSCANY-1569 so how about including
> implementation-osgi in the 0.99 release? It would add about 500K of Felix
> dependencies which doesn't seem a big deal, so i think we should include
> it.
>
> ...ant
>
> On 8/20/07, Rajini Sivaram <ra...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ant,
> >
> > I will take a look at the intermittent test failure in itest/osgi
> > -implementation.
> >
> >
> > Thank you...
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rajini
> >
> > On 8/16/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi SCA/OSGi-ers,
> > >
> > > Just bringing this up again to see if there is any interesting in
> moving
> > > this along still. We've been talking about having a Tuscany 1.0release
> > > in a couple of months, be great if we could have a good OSGi story for
> that.
> > > Also the Apache Felix 1.0 release is out now and the existing
> > > implemention.osgi code has been moved off SNAPSHOTs to use Felix 1.0so
> > > we can now include that in releases (though i think one of the itests
> still
> > > has an intermittent failure so would be good to fix that as well).
> > >
> > > ...ant
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/29/07, Hawkins, Joel < Joel.Hawkins@compuware.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi SCA/OSGi-ers.
> > > >
> > > > I did some initial work back during the M2 days (working with
> Nicole)
> > > > to
> > > > host Tuscany in an Equinox runtime. It looks like I may have some
> time
> > > > to re-engage during the next few months, so is there anything in
> > > > particular that I could be looking at to help move the OSGi efforts
> > > > ahead? Like Bill and Raymond below, my primary interest is in seeing
> > > > OSGi used as a container for hosting SCA.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Joel
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto: rajinisivaram@googlemail.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
> > > > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
> > > >
> > > > Sebastien,
> > > >
> > > > Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging of SCA
> > > > contributions as OSGi bundles, once the work on implementation.osgiis
> > > > complete.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you...
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Rajini
> > > >
> > > > On 6/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill Barnhill wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As I may have mentioned earlier I also have been working on the
> > > > SCA-OSGi
> > > > > > integration, but from the third aspect that Raymond mentions,
> > > > using
> > > > > > OSGi as
> > > > > > an underlying technology for an SCA container providing an
> > > > extension
> > > > > > mechanism, dependency resolution and service registry
> > > > capabilities.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think my work would dovetail nicely with the work Rajini and
> > > > Graham
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > been doing. Would it be possible to create an osgi directory
> under
> > > > > > contrib
> > > > > > with a subdir under that for each of our efforts (host, binding,
> > > > > > implementation)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you think?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Bill,
> > > > >
> > > > > That sounds like a good idea. Tuscany modules are not that
> different
> > > > > from OSGI bundles, I think it wouldn't be too difficult to package
> > > > them
> > > > > as actual bundles, and come up with a variation of host-embedded
> > > > that
> > > > > will load them as such, allowing for some isolation and better
> > > > > jar/bundle dependency management.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you have the structure you need with sca/modules/host-osgi? Do
> > > > you
> > > > > have code that we can look at?
> > > > >
> > > > > Any questions or issues that we can help with?
> > > > >
> > > > > On a different, but related subject, has anybody started on
> > > > supporting
> > > > > the package of (application) SCA contributions (as defined by the
> > > > SCA
> > > > > assembly spec) as OSGI bundles?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jean-Sebastien
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee
> only.
> > > > It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the
> named
> > > > addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or
> disclose
> > > > it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us
> immediately
> > > > and then destroy it.
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
ant elder wrote:
> This itest has been fixed now with TUSCANY-1569 so how about including
> implementation-osgi in the 0.99 release? It would add about 500K of Felix
> dependencies which doesn't seem a big deal, so i think we should include it.
>
> ...ant
>
>
+1 to include it. Yesterday there was a test failing in
osgi-implementation, but it just seemed like a small glitch that can
probably be fixed today.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Posted by Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>.
On 8/23/07, Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for including it in the release.
>
> Simon
>
> ant elder wrote:
>
> > This itest has been fixed now with TUSCANY-1569 so how about including
> > implementation-osgi in the 0.99 release? It would add about 500K of
> Felix
> > dependencies which doesn't seem a big deal, so i think we should include
> it.
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On 8/20/07, Rajini Sivaram <ra...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Ant,
> >>
> >>I will take a look at the intermittent test failure in itest/osgi
> >>-implementation.
> >>
> >>
> >>Thank you...
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Rajini
> >>
> >>On 8/16/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi SCA/OSGi-ers,
> >>>
> >>>Just bringing this up again to see if there is any interesting in
> moving
> >>>this along still. We've been talking about having a Tuscany 1.0 release
> >>>in a couple of months, be great if we could have a good OSGi story for
> that.
> >>>Also the Apache Felix 1.0 release is out now and the existing
> >>>implemention.osgi code has been moved off SNAPSHOTs to use Felix 1.0so
> >>>we can now include that in releases (though i think one of the itests
> still
> >>>has an intermittent failure so would be good to fix that as well).
> >>>
> >>> ...ant
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On 6/29/07, Hawkins, Joel < Joel.Hawkins@compuware.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Hi SCA/OSGi-ers.
> >>>>
> >>>>I did some initial work back during the M2 days (working with Nicole)
> >>>>to
> >>>>host Tuscany in an Equinox runtime. It looks like I may have some time
> >>>>to re-engage during the next few months, so is there anything in
> >>>>particular that I could be looking at to help move the OSGi efforts
> >>>>ahead? Like Bill and Raymond below, my primary interest is in seeing
> >>>>OSGi used as a container for hosting SCA.
> >>>>
> >>>>Cheers,
> >>>>Joel
> >>>>
> >>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto: rajinisivaram@googlemail.com]
> >>>>Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
> >>>>To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
> >>>>Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
> >>>>
> >>>>Sebastien,
> >>>>
> >>>>Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging of SCA
> >>>>contributions as OSGi bundles, once the work on implementation.osgi is
> >>>>complete.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Thank you...
> >>>>
> >>>>Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>>Rajini
> >>>>
> >>>>On 6/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino@apache.org > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Bill Barnhill wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>As I may have mentioned earlier I also have been working on the
> >>>>
> >>>>SCA-OSGi
> >>>>
> >>>>>>integration, but from the third aspect that Raymond mentions,
> >>>>
> >>>>using
> >>>>
> >>>>>>OSGi as
> >>>>>>an underlying technology for an SCA container providing an
> >>>>
> >>>>extension
> >>>>
> >>>>>>mechanism, dependency resolution and service registry
> >>>>
> >>>>capabilities.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>I think my work would dovetail nicely with the work Rajini and
> >>>>
> >>>>Graham
> >>>>
> >>>>>>have
> >>>>>>been doing. Would it be possible to create an osgi directory under
> >>>>>>contrib
> >>>>>>with a subdir under that for each of our efforts (host, binding,
> >>>>>>implementation)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>What do you think?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Hi Bill,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>That sounds like a good idea. Tuscany modules are not that different
> >>>>>from OSGI bundles, I think it wouldn't be too difficult to package
> >>>>
> >>>>them
> >>>>
> >>>>>as actual bundles, and come up with a variation of host-embedded
> >>>>
> >>>>that
> >>>>
> >>>>>will load them as such, allowing for some isolation and better
> >>>>>jar/bundle dependency management.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Do you have the structure you need with sca/modules/host-osgi? Do
> >>>>
> >>>>you
> >>>>
> >>>>>have code that we can look at?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Any questions or issues that we can help with?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On a different, but related subject, has anybody started on
> >>>>
> >>>>supporting
> >>>>
> >>>>>the package of (application) SCA contributions (as defined by the
> >>>>
> >>>>SCA
> >>>>
> >>>>>assembly spec) as OSGI bundles?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Thanks
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>Jean-Sebastien
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only.
> >>>>It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the
> named
> >>>>addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or
> disclose
> >>>>it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us
> immediately
> >>>>and then destroy it.
> >>>>
> >>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
> +1 to including it from me. Sample looks pretty good. Can we get some
suitable words for the CHANGES file from someone about it.
Simon
Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Posted by Simon Nash <na...@hursley.ibm.com>.
+1 for including it in the release.
Simon
ant elder wrote:
> This itest has been fixed now with TUSCANY-1569 so how about including
> implementation-osgi in the 0.99 release? It would add about 500K of Felix
> dependencies which doesn't seem a big deal, so i think we should include it.
>
> ...ant
>
> On 8/20/07, Rajini Sivaram <ra...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>Ant,
>>
>>I will take a look at the intermittent test failure in itest/osgi
>>-implementation.
>>
>>
>>Thank you...
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Rajini
>>
>>On 8/16/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi SCA/OSGi-ers,
>>>
>>>Just bringing this up again to see if there is any interesting in moving
>>>this along still. We've been talking about having a Tuscany 1.0 release
>>>in a couple of months, be great if we could have a good OSGi story for that.
>>>Also the Apache Felix 1.0 release is out now and the existing
>>>implemention.osgi code has been moved off SNAPSHOTs to use Felix 1.0 so
>>>we can now include that in releases (though i think one of the itests still
>>>has an intermittent failure so would be good to fix that as well).
>>>
>>> ...ant
>>>
>>>
>>>On 6/29/07, Hawkins, Joel < Joel.Hawkins@compuware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi SCA/OSGi-ers.
>>>>
>>>>I did some initial work back during the M2 days (working with Nicole)
>>>>to
>>>>host Tuscany in an Equinox runtime. It looks like I may have some time
>>>>to re-engage during the next few months, so is there anything in
>>>>particular that I could be looking at to help move the OSGi efforts
>>>>ahead? Like Bill and Raymond below, my primary interest is in seeing
>>>>OSGi used as a container for hosting SCA.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Joel
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto: rajinisivaram@googlemail.com]
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
>>>>To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
>>>>Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
>>>>
>>>>Sebastien,
>>>>
>>>>Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging of SCA
>>>>contributions as OSGi bundles, once the work on implementation.osgi is
>>>>complete.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thank you...
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>
>>>>Rajini
>>>>
>>>>On 6/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino@apache.org > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Bill Barnhill wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As I may have mentioned earlier I also have been working on the
>>>>
>>>>SCA-OSGi
>>>>
>>>>>>integration, but from the third aspect that Raymond mentions,
>>>>
>>>>using
>>>>
>>>>>>OSGi as
>>>>>>an underlying technology for an SCA container providing an
>>>>
>>>>extension
>>>>
>>>>>>mechanism, dependency resolution and service registry
>>>>
>>>>capabilities.
>>>>
>>>>>>I think my work would dovetail nicely with the work Rajini and
>>>>
>>>>Graham
>>>>
>>>>>>have
>>>>>>been doing. Would it be possible to create an osgi directory under
>>>>>>contrib
>>>>>>with a subdir under that for each of our efforts (host, binding,
>>>>>>implementation)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi Bill,
>>>>>
>>>>>That sounds like a good idea. Tuscany modules are not that different
>>>>>from OSGI bundles, I think it wouldn't be too difficult to package
>>>>
>>>>them
>>>>
>>>>>as actual bundles, and come up with a variation of host-embedded
>>>>
>>>>that
>>>>
>>>>>will load them as such, allowing for some isolation and better
>>>>>jar/bundle dependency management.
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you have the structure you need with sca/modules/host-osgi? Do
>>>>
>>>>you
>>>>
>>>>>have code that we can look at?
>>>>>
>>>>>Any questions or issues that we can help with?
>>>>>
>>>>>On a different, but related subject, has anybody started on
>>>>
>>>>supporting
>>>>
>>>>>the package of (application) SCA contributions (as defined by the
>>>>
>>>>SCA
>>>>
>>>>>assembly spec) as OSGI bundles?
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>Jean-Sebastien
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only.
>>>>It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
>>>>addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose
>>>>it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately
>>>>and then destroy it.
>>>>
>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
This itest has been fixed now with TUSCANY-1569 so how about including
implementation-osgi in the 0.99 release? It would add about 500K of Felix
dependencies which doesn't seem a big deal, so i think we should include it.
...ant
On 8/20/07, Rajini Sivaram <ra...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Ant,
>
> I will take a look at the intermittent test failure in itest/osgi
> -implementation.
>
>
> Thank you...
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On 8/16/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi SCA/OSGi-ers,
> >
> > Just bringing this up again to see if there is any interesting in moving
> > this along still. We've been talking about having a Tuscany 1.0 release
> > in a couple of months, be great if we could have a good OSGi story for that.
> > Also the Apache Felix 1.0 release is out now and the existing
> > implemention.osgi code has been moved off SNAPSHOTs to use Felix 1.0 so
> > we can now include that in releases (though i think one of the itests still
> > has an intermittent failure so would be good to fix that as well).
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> >
> > On 6/29/07, Hawkins, Joel < Joel.Hawkins@compuware.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi SCA/OSGi-ers.
> > >
> > > I did some initial work back during the M2 days (working with Nicole)
> > > to
> > > host Tuscany in an Equinox runtime. It looks like I may have some time
> > > to re-engage during the next few months, so is there anything in
> > > particular that I could be looking at to help move the OSGi efforts
> > > ahead? Like Bill and Raymond below, my primary interest is in seeing
> > > OSGi used as a container for hosting SCA.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Joel
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto: rajinisivaram@googlemail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM
> > > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration
> > >
> > > Sebastien,
> > >
> > > Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging of SCA
> > > contributions as OSGi bundles, once the work on implementation.osgi is
> > > complete.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you...
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajini
> > >
> > > On 6/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <jsdelfino@apache.org > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Bill Barnhill wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > As I may have mentioned earlier I also have been working on the
> > > SCA-OSGi
> > > > > integration, but from the third aspect that Raymond mentions,
> > > using
> > > > > OSGi as
> > > > > an underlying technology for an SCA container providing an
> > > extension
> > > > > mechanism, dependency resolution and service registry
> > > capabilities.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think my work would dovetail nicely with the work Rajini and
> > > Graham
> > > > > have
> > > > > been doing. Would it be possible to create an osgi directory under
> > > > > contrib
> > > > > with a subdir under that for each of our efforts (host, binding,
> > > > > implementation)
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Bill,
> > > >
> > > > That sounds like a good idea. Tuscany modules are not that different
> > > > from OSGI bundles, I think it wouldn't be too difficult to package
> > > them
> > > > as actual bundles, and come up with a variation of host-embedded
> > > that
> > > > will load them as such, allowing for some isolation and better
> > > > jar/bundle dependency management.
> > > >
> > > > Do you have the structure you need with sca/modules/host-osgi? Do
> > > you
> > > > have code that we can look at?
> > > >
> > > > Any questions or issues that we can help with?
> > > >
> > > > On a different, but related subject, has anybody started on
> > > supporting
> > > > the package of (application) SCA contributions (as defined by the
> > > SCA
> > > > assembly spec) as OSGI bundles?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Sebastien
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only.
> > > It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
> > > addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose
> > > it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately
> > > and then destroy it.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>