You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cordova.apache.org by Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com> on 2013/11/04 17:43:40 UTC
2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
I'm going to work on getting 2.9.1 out today. It would be great if people
could test + tag 3.2.0rc1 for their platforms. I'd love to get it out in
the next two days.
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Mike Billau <mi...@gmail.com>.
Last week we were able to get a Nexus 5 running Android 4.4, so I was doing
mobilespec testing on that. There did not seem to be any serious breaking
problems with 3.2.0rc1. I did find the following annoying issues though:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5398 - Selecting any images will
fail unless you first go through the "Gallery" app.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5294 - input type=file does not
work with 4.4 anymore. We already have a thread going on about this.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5427 - InAppBrowser sometimes does
not fire loadstop or loaderror events, and this in turn sometimes causes
the app to crash. This seems to happen on any 4.x version of Android. It's
hard to reproduce.
Aside from these, none of the manual tests had any new failures that I am
aware of. When we do the 3.2 release blog post, we should be able to use
the current versions of the plugins in the "snap shot".
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Blog post is live for it
> http://cordova.apache.org/blog/releases/2013/11/13/cordova-320rc1.html
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Shaz, you are correct!
> >
> > semver wants you to do rc versions that way.
> >
> > I meant to say npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc.1
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Steve, you published the version as: 3.2.0-rc.1
> >>
> >> so the correct line is:
> >> npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc.1
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hey all,
> >> >
> >> > I am going to put up a blog post for review shortly for the RC.
> >> >
> >> > If you are interested in helping test the RC (DO IT), you can install
> >> it by
> >> > going npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc1.
> >> >
> >> > Let me know if their are any issues blocking the final release. I know
> >> that
> >> > the Firefox update script is not quite working, but this is a
> firefoxos
> >> > platform issue, not a cli one. I am working on it. :)
> >> >
> >> > Plugman 0.15.0 has also been published and set to latest.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Update for everyone
> >> > >
> >> > > I chatted with the platform leads and we are hoping to tag 3.2.0rc1
> >> > > tomorrow.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard <
> cmarcelk@gmail.com>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> >> BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests
> on
> >> > >> 4.2.2 on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> >> > >> >> at
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself
> >> > >> > sometimes. I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted
> >> because
> >> > >> > it's not the most reliable.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Yup! The JS is broken on the tests, therefore this would break
> >> > >> window.location working! Please disregard this test until we've
> >> > >> upgraded the test project to be a proper 3.x set of tests.
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>.
Blog post is live for it
http://cordova.apache.org/blog/releases/2013/11/13/cordova-320rc1.html
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shaz, you are correct!
>
> semver wants you to do rc versions that way.
>
> I meant to say npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc.1
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Steve, you published the version as: 3.2.0-rc.1
>>
>> so the correct line is:
>> npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc.1
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey all,
>> >
>> > I am going to put up a blog post for review shortly for the RC.
>> >
>> > If you are interested in helping test the RC (DO IT), you can install
>> it by
>> > going npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc1.
>> >
>> > Let me know if their are any issues blocking the final release. I know
>> that
>> > the Firefox update script is not quite working, but this is a firefoxos
>> > platform issue, not a cli one. I am working on it. :)
>> >
>> > Plugman 0.15.0 has also been published and set to latest.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Update for everyone
>> > >
>> > > I chatted with the platform leads and we are hoping to tag 3.2.0rc1
>> > > tomorrow.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard <cm...@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >> BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests on
>> > >> 4.2.2 on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
>> > >> >> at
>> > >>
>> >
>> org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself
>> > >> > sometimes. I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted
>> because
>> > >> > it's not the most reliable.
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >> Yup! The JS is broken on the tests, therefore this would break
>> > >> window.location working! Please disregard this test until we've
>> > >> upgraded the test project to be a proper 3.x set of tests.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>.
Shaz, you are correct!
semver wants you to do rc versions that way.
I meant to say npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc.1
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Steve, you published the version as: 3.2.0-rc.1
>
> so the correct line is:
> npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc.1
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I am going to put up a blog post for review shortly for the RC.
> >
> > If you are interested in helping test the RC (DO IT), you can install it
> by
> > going npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc1.
> >
> > Let me know if their are any issues blocking the final release. I know
> that
> > the Firefox update script is not quite working, but this is a firefoxos
> > platform issue, not a cli one. I am working on it. :)
> >
> > Plugman 0.15.0 has also been published and set to latest.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Update for everyone
> > >
> > > I chatted with the platform leads and we are hoping to tag 3.2.0rc1
> > > tomorrow.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard <cm...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests on
> > >> 4.2.2 on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> > >> >> at
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself
> > >> > sometimes. I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted
> because
> > >> > it's not the most reliable.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Yup! The JS is broken on the tests, therefore this would break
> > >> window.location working! Please disregard this test until we've
> > >> upgraded the test project to be a proper 3.x set of tests.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>.
Steve, you published the version as: 3.2.0-rc.1
so the correct line is:
npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc.1
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am going to put up a blog post for review shortly for the RC.
>
> If you are interested in helping test the RC (DO IT), you can install it by
> going npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc1.
>
> Let me know if their are any issues blocking the final release. I know that
> the Firefox update script is not quite working, but this is a firefoxos
> platform issue, not a cli one. I am working on it. :)
>
> Plugman 0.15.0 has also been published and set to latest.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Update for everyone
> >
> > I chatted with the platform leads and we are hoping to tag 3.2.0rc1
> > tomorrow.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard <cm...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests on
> >> 4.2.2 on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
> >> >>
> >> >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> >> >> at
> >>
> org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself
> >> > sometimes. I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted because
> >> > it's not the most reliable.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yup! The JS is broken on the tests, therefore this would break
> >> window.location working! Please disregard this test until we've
> >> upgraded the test project to be a proper 3.x set of tests.
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>.
Hey all,
I am going to put up a blog post for review shortly for the RC.
If you are interested in helping test the RC (DO IT), you can install it by
going npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc1.
Let me know if their are any issues blocking the final release. I know that
the Firefox update script is not quite working, but this is a firefoxos
platform issue, not a cli one. I am working on it. :)
Plugman 0.15.0 has also been published and set to latest.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Update for everyone
>
> I chatted with the platform leads and we are hoping to tag 3.2.0rc1
> tomorrow.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard <cm...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests on
>> 4.2.2 on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
>> >>
>> >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
>> >> at
>> org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
>> >>
>> >
>> > I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself
>> > sometimes. I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted because
>> > it's not the most reliable.
>> >
>>
>> Yup! The JS is broken on the tests, therefore this would break
>> window.location working! Please disregard this test until we've
>> upgraded the test project to be a proper 3.x set of tests.
>>
>
>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>.
Update for everyone
I chatted with the platform leads and we are hoping to tag 3.2.0rc1
tomorrow.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard <cm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests on
> 4.2.2 on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
> >>
> >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> >> at
> org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
> >>
> >
> > I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself
> > sometimes. I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted because
> > it's not the most reliable.
> >
>
> Yup! The JS is broken on the tests, therefore this would break
> window.location working! Please disregard this test until we've
> upgraded the test project to be a proper 3.x set of tests.
>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests on 4.2.2 on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
>>
>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
>> at org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
>>
>
> I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself
> sometimes. I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted because
> it's not the most reliable.
>
Yup! The JS is broken on the tests, therefore this would break
window.location working! Please disregard this test until we've
upgraded the test project to be a proper 3.x set of tests.
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Mike Billau <mi...@gmail.com>.
>> Remember, we're not testing the plugins, so that shouldn't block any
release.
+1, that any issues with plugins should not hold up the release.
However, I thought that with each cadence release we were going to publish
a list of the plugins that were tested with that release [1] - a sort of
snapshot. We were going to at least list the commits on the blog post so it
is possible to consistently recreate a 3.2 timeframe project at a future
point. If we are still planning to do this than I think we need to run the
manual plugin tests.
[1] http://markmail.org/message/54crgxwa5anvva3o
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests on 4.2.2
> on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
> >
> > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> > at
> org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
> >
>
> I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself
> sometimes. I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted because
> it's not the most reliable.
>
> > junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<pass> but was:<null>
> > at
> org.apache.cordova.test.CordovaResourceApiTest.testWebViewRequestIntercept(CordovaResourceApiTest.java:258)
>
> I got two failures with the ResourceAPI the last time I tested it as
> well. It'd be good if this test was looked into, since I'm afraid it
> might have gotten stale since it was written.
>
> >
> > I thought it was pretty cool that 100% of the automated tests in
> mobile-spec passed. An unbroken set of green dots ;-)
>
> I think it's cool as well. I wonder if this would happen on Jasmine 2.
>
> >
> > On Nov 6, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Mike Billau <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I have been testing 3.2.0rc1 on Android 4.2.2 and 4.3 (hitting the 2.x
> >> devices tomorrow.
>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard <cm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests on 4.2.2 on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
>
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> at org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
>
I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself
sometimes. I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted because
it's not the most reliable.
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<pass> but was:<null>
> at org.apache.cordova.test.CordovaResourceApiTest.testWebViewRequestIntercept(CordovaResourceApiTest.java:258)
I got two failures with the ResourceAPI the last time I tested it as
well. It'd be good if this test was looked into, since I'm afraid it
might have gotten stale since it was written.
>
> I thought it was pretty cool that 100% of the automated tests in mobile-spec passed. An unbroken set of green dots ;-)
I think it's cool as well. I wonder if this would happen on Jasmine 2.
>
> On Nov 6, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Mike Billau <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have been testing 3.2.0rc1 on Android 4.2.2 and 4.3 (hitting the 2.x
>> devices tomorrow.
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Marcel Kinard <cm...@gmail.com>.
BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests on 4.2.2 on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
at org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<pass> but was:<null>
at org.apache.cordova.test.CordovaResourceApiTest.testWebViewRequestIntercept(CordovaResourceApiTest.java:258)
I thought it was pretty cool that 100% of the automated tests in mobile-spec passed. An unbroken set of green dots ;-)
On Nov 6, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Mike Billau <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been testing 3.2.0rc1 on Android 4.2.2 and 4.3 (hitting the 2.x
> devices tomorrow.
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Mike Billau <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been testing 3.2.0rc1 on Android 4.2.2 and 4.3 (hitting the 2.x
> devices tomorrow. Crossing fingers for the 4.4 ROM) Automated tests are
> fine. I'm getting a few glitches on manual tests for SplashScreen and
> saving audio/video from Capture so I will investigate to see if these are
> new failures ;).
>
Remember, we're not testing the plugins, so that shouldn't block any release.
> In the hallway we were thinking that it would be really nice to add
> discrete instructions for performing the manual tests. Some of this content
> is captured on the RunningTests wiki page[1] but if you don't know about
> this wiki page it makes manual testing harder than it needs to be. I
> created CB-5300 [2] to address making the manual tests easier to run.
>
I don't think we should have manual tests at all. Manual tests are
tests that are half-done, and we should be working on automating those
tests. If anyone has ideas on what we should use to automate these,
that would be helpful.
Joe
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for not being constructive!
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Smith, Peter <pe...@fast.au.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> FYI from July - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4468
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bowserj@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013 8:27 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Mike Billau <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I have been testing 3.2.0rc1 on Android 4.2.2 and 4.3 (hitting the 2.x
>
>> devices tomorrow. Crossing fingers for the 4.4 ROM) Automated tests
>> are fine. I'm getting a few glitches on manual tests for SplashScreen
>> and saving audio/video from Capture so I will investigate to see if
>> these are new failures ;).
>>
>
> Hey
>
> I just tested the Splashscreen, and it works fine. BTW: We don't have a
> splashscreen on by default on Android because the create script doesn't
> add a splashscreen. You have to add a png manually, and add the
> following to your config.xml for splashscreen to work:
>
> <preference name="splashscreen" value="splash" />
> <preference name="splashScreenDelay" value="10000" />
>
> BTW: I have no idea why the docs are so totally wrong. I was probably
> having trouble copying the XML over, or it got formatted weird, or both.
> However, if you don't define a splashscreen, you don't get one.
>
>> In the hallway we were thinking that it would be really nice to add
>> discrete instructions for performing the manual tests. Some of this
>> content is captured on the RunningTests wiki page[1] but if you don't
>> know about this wiki page it makes manual testing harder than it needs
>
>> to be. I created CB-5300 [2] to address making the manual tests easier
> to run.
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/RunningTests
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5300
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>> 2.9.1 is up now at
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cordova/
>>>
>>> I am working on the blog post right now. Will throw it up for review
>>> when ready.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:41 AM, James Jong <wj...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'll help do some testing w 3.2 this week.
>>> > -James Jong
>>> >
>>> > On Nov 4, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > +1 No OS X (no, don't do the 2.9.0 OS X)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill
>>> > > <st...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> For 2.9.1
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I am going to release:
>>> > >> iOS
>>> > >> Android
>>> > >> Windows 8
>>> > >> WP 7/8
>>> > >> BlackBerry (no updates were made for 2.9.1. Just going to ship
>>> > >> the
>>> 2.9.0
>>> > >> version)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I will create 2.9.1 docs based of 2.9.0. We can always make
>>> > >> changes to
>>> > them
>>> > >> if required. For now it will just be a reference for people to
>>> > >> use who
>>> > want
>>> > >> to use 2.9.1
>>> > >>
>>> > >> No CLI
>>> > >> No OSX (could ship the 2.9.0 version if people want me to)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thoughts?
>>> > >> -Steve
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Bryan Higgins
>>> > >> <bryan@bryanhiggins.net
>>> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> I will take care of BB10
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Steven Gill
>>> > >>> <stevengill97@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>> I'm going to work on getting 2.9.1 out today. It would be
>>> > >>>> great if
>>> > >> people
>>> > >>>> could test + tag 3.2.0rc1 for their platforms. I'd love to get
>
>>> > >>>> it
>>> out
>>> > >> in
>>> > >>>> the next two days.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>
>
RE: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by "Smith, Peter" <pe...@fast.au.fujitsu.com>.
FYI from July - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4468
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bowserj@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013 8:27 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Mike Billau <mi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I have been testing 3.2.0rc1 on Android 4.2.2 and 4.3 (hitting the 2.x
> devices tomorrow. Crossing fingers for the 4.4 ROM) Automated tests
> are fine. I'm getting a few glitches on manual tests for SplashScreen
> and saving audio/video from Capture so I will investigate to see if
> these are new failures ;).
>
Hey
I just tested the Splashscreen, and it works fine. BTW: We don't have a
splashscreen on by default on Android because the create script doesn't
add a splashscreen. You have to add a png manually, and add the
following to your config.xml for splashscreen to work:
<preference name="splashscreen" value="splash" />
<preference name="splashScreenDelay" value="10000" />
BTW: I have no idea why the docs are so totally wrong. I was probably
having trouble copying the XML over, or it got formatted weird, or both.
However, if you don't define a splashscreen, you don't get one.
> In the hallway we were thinking that it would be really nice to add
> discrete instructions for performing the manual tests. Some of this
> content is captured on the RunningTests wiki page[1] but if you don't
> know about this wiki page it makes manual testing harder than it needs
> to be. I created CB-5300 [2] to address making the manual tests easier
to run.
>
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/RunningTests
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5300
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> 2.9.1 is up now at
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cordova/
>>
>> I am working on the blog post right now. Will throw it up for review
>> when ready.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:41 AM, James Jong <wj...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> > I'll help do some testing w 3.2 this week.
>> > -James Jong
>> >
>> > On Nov 4, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 No OS X (no, don't do the 2.9.0 OS X)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill
>> > > <st...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> For 2.9.1
>> > >>
>> > >> I am going to release:
>> > >> iOS
>> > >> Android
>> > >> Windows 8
>> > >> WP 7/8
>> > >> BlackBerry (no updates were made for 2.9.1. Just going to ship
>> > >> the
>> 2.9.0
>> > >> version)
>> > >>
>> > >> I will create 2.9.1 docs based of 2.9.0. We can always make
>> > >> changes to
>> > them
>> > >> if required. For now it will just be a reference for people to
>> > >> use who
>> > want
>> > >> to use 2.9.1
>> > >>
>> > >> No CLI
>> > >> No OSX (could ship the 2.9.0 version if people want me to)
>> > >>
>> > >> Thoughts?
>> > >> -Steve
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Bryan Higgins
>> > >> <bryan@bryanhiggins.net
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> I will take care of BB10
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Steven Gill
>> > >>> <stevengill97@gmail.com
>> >
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> I'm going to work on getting 2.9.1 out today. It would be
>> > >>>> great if
>> > >> people
>> > >>>> could test + tag 3.2.0rc1 for their platforms. I'd love to get
>> > >>>> it
>> out
>> > >> in
>> > >>>> the next two days.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Joe Bowser <bo...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Mike Billau <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been testing 3.2.0rc1 on Android 4.2.2 and 4.3 (hitting the 2.x
> devices tomorrow. Crossing fingers for the 4.4 ROM) Automated tests are
> fine. I'm getting a few glitches on manual tests for SplashScreen and
> saving audio/video from Capture so I will investigate to see if these are
> new failures ;).
>
Hey
I just tested the Splashscreen, and it works fine. BTW: We don't have
a splashscreen on by default on Android because the create script
doesn't add a splashscreen. You have to add a png manually, and add
the following to your config.xml for splashscreen to work:
<preference name="splashscreen" value="splash" />
<preference name="splashScreenDelay" value="10000" />
BTW: I have no idea why the docs are so totally wrong. I was probably
having trouble copying the XML over, or it got formatted weird, or
both. However, if you don't define a splashscreen, you don't get one.
> In the hallway we were thinking that it would be really nice to add
> discrete instructions for performing the manual tests. Some of this content
> is captured on the RunningTests wiki page[1] but if you don't know about
> this wiki page it makes manual testing harder than it needs to be. I
> created CB-5300 [2] to address making the manual tests easier to run.
>
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/RunningTests
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5300
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2.9.1 is up now at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cordova/
>>
>> I am working on the blog post right now. Will throw it up for review when
>> ready.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:41 AM, James Jong <wj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I'll help do some testing w 3.2 this week.
>> > -James Jong
>> >
>> > On Nov 4, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 No OS X (no, don't do the 2.9.0 OS X)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> For 2.9.1
>> > >>
>> > >> I am going to release:
>> > >> iOS
>> > >> Android
>> > >> Windows 8
>> > >> WP 7/8
>> > >> BlackBerry (no updates were made for 2.9.1. Just going to ship the
>> 2.9.0
>> > >> version)
>> > >>
>> > >> I will create 2.9.1 docs based of 2.9.0. We can always make changes to
>> > them
>> > >> if required. For now it will just be a reference for people to use who
>> > want
>> > >> to use 2.9.1
>> > >>
>> > >> No CLI
>> > >> No OSX (could ship the 2.9.0 version if people want me to)
>> > >>
>> > >> Thoughts?
>> > >> -Steve
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Bryan Higgins <bryan@bryanhiggins.net
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> I will take care of BB10
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com
>> >
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> I'm going to work on getting 2.9.1 out today. It would be great if
>> > >> people
>> > >>>> could test + tag 3.2.0rc1 for their platforms. I'd love to get it
>> out
>> > >> in
>> > >>>> the next two days.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Mike Billau <mi...@gmail.com>.
I have been testing 3.2.0rc1 on Android 4.2.2 and 4.3 (hitting the 2.x
devices tomorrow. Crossing fingers for the 4.4 ROM) Automated tests are
fine. I'm getting a few glitches on manual tests for SplashScreen and
saving audio/video from Capture so I will investigate to see if these are
new failures ;).
In the hallway we were thinking that it would be really nice to add
discrete instructions for performing the manual tests. Some of this content
is captured on the RunningTests wiki page[1] but if you don't know about
this wiki page it makes manual testing harder than it needs to be. I
created CB-5300 [2] to address making the manual tests easier to run.
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/RunningTests
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-5300
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2.9.1 is up now at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cordova/
>
> I am working on the blog post right now. Will throw it up for review when
> ready.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:41 AM, James Jong <wj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'll help do some testing w 3.2 this week.
> > -James Jong
> >
> > On Nov 4, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 No OS X (no, don't do the 2.9.0 OS X)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> For 2.9.1
> > >>
> > >> I am going to release:
> > >> iOS
> > >> Android
> > >> Windows 8
> > >> WP 7/8
> > >> BlackBerry (no updates were made for 2.9.1. Just going to ship the
> 2.9.0
> > >> version)
> > >>
> > >> I will create 2.9.1 docs based of 2.9.0. We can always make changes to
> > them
> > >> if required. For now it will just be a reference for people to use who
> > want
> > >> to use 2.9.1
> > >>
> > >> No CLI
> > >> No OSX (could ship the 2.9.0 version if people want me to)
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >> -Steve
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Bryan Higgins <bryan@bryanhiggins.net
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I will take care of BB10
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I'm going to work on getting 2.9.1 out today. It would be great if
> > >> people
> > >>>> could test + tag 3.2.0rc1 for their platforms. I'd love to get it
> out
> > >> in
> > >>>> the next two days.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>.
2.9.1 is up now at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cordova/
I am working on the blog post right now. Will throw it up for review when
ready.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:41 AM, James Jong <wj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll help do some testing w 3.2 this week.
> -James Jong
>
> On Nov 4, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 No OS X (no, don't do the 2.9.0 OS X)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> For 2.9.1
> >>
> >> I am going to release:
> >> iOS
> >> Android
> >> Windows 8
> >> WP 7/8
> >> BlackBerry (no updates were made for 2.9.1. Just going to ship the 2.9.0
> >> version)
> >>
> >> I will create 2.9.1 docs based of 2.9.0. We can always make changes to
> them
> >> if required. For now it will just be a reference for people to use who
> want
> >> to use 2.9.1
> >>
> >> No CLI
> >> No OSX (could ship the 2.9.0 version if people want me to)
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >> -Steve
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Bryan Higgins <bryan@bryanhiggins.net
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I will take care of BB10
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I'm going to work on getting 2.9.1 out today. It would be great if
> >> people
> >>>> could test + tag 3.2.0rc1 for their platforms. I'd love to get it out
> >> in
> >>>> the next two days.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by James Jong <wj...@gmail.com>.
I'll help do some testing w 3.2 this week.
-James Jong
On Nov 4, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 No OS X (no, don't do the 2.9.0 OS X)
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> For 2.9.1
>>
>> I am going to release:
>> iOS
>> Android
>> Windows 8
>> WP 7/8
>> BlackBerry (no updates were made for 2.9.1. Just going to ship the 2.9.0
>> version)
>>
>> I will create 2.9.1 docs based of 2.9.0. We can always make changes to them
>> if required. For now it will just be a reference for people to use who want
>> to use 2.9.1
>>
>> No CLI
>> No OSX (could ship the 2.9.0 version if people want me to)
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> -Steve
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Bryan Higgins <bryan@bryanhiggins.net
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> I will take care of BB10
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm going to work on getting 2.9.1 out today. It would be great if
>> people
>>>> could test + tag 3.2.0rc1 for their platforms. I'd love to get it out
>> in
>>>> the next two days.
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1 No OS X (no, don't do the 2.9.0 OS X)
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For 2.9.1
>
> I am going to release:
> iOS
> Android
> Windows 8
> WP 7/8
> BlackBerry (no updates were made for 2.9.1. Just going to ship the 2.9.0
> version)
>
> I will create 2.9.1 docs based of 2.9.0. We can always make changes to them
> if required. For now it will just be a reference for people to use who want
> to use 2.9.1
>
> No CLI
> No OSX (could ship the 2.9.0 version if people want me to)
>
> Thoughts?
> -Steve
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Bryan Higgins <bryan@bryanhiggins.net
> >wrote:
>
> > I will take care of BB10
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm going to work on getting 2.9.1 out today. It would be great if
> people
> > > could test + tag 3.2.0rc1 for their platforms. I'd love to get it out
> in
> > > the next two days.
> > >
> >
>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>.
For 2.9.1
I am going to release:
iOS
Android
Windows 8
WP 7/8
BlackBerry (no updates were made for 2.9.1. Just going to ship the 2.9.0
version)
I will create 2.9.1 docs based of 2.9.0. We can always make changes to them
if required. For now it will just be a reference for people to use who want
to use 2.9.1
No CLI
No OSX (could ship the 2.9.0 version if people want me to)
Thoughts?
-Steve
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Bryan Higgins <br...@bryanhiggins.net>wrote:
> I will take care of BB10
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm going to work on getting 2.9.1 out today. It would be great if people
> > could test + tag 3.2.0rc1 for their platforms. I'd love to get it out in
> > the next two days.
> >
>
Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Posted by Bryan Higgins <br...@bryanhiggins.net>.
I will take care of BB10
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm going to work on getting 2.9.1 out today. It would be great if people
> could test + tag 3.2.0rc1 for their platforms. I'd love to get it out in
> the next two days.
>