You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/11/19 21:23:39 UTC

[jira] Assigned: (CASSANDRA-248) Replace factory method based on explicit locks for a more succint syntax

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jonathan Ellis reassigned CASSANDRA-248:
----------------------------------------

    Assignee: Gary Dusbabek

I think Edward lost interest.  Can you audit the instance() methods and make sure they are not using broken double-checked locking?  (See e.g. http://jeremymanson.blogspot.com/2008/05/double-checked-locking.html)

> Replace factory method based on explicit locks for a more succint syntax
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-248
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-248
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Edward Ribeiro
>            Assignee: Gary Dusbabek
>         Attachments: CASSANDRA-248.patch
>
>
> Replace factory method based on explicit locks for a more succint syntax. The code becomes simpler and more readable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.