You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@hbase.apache.org by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@gmail.com> on 2015/03/12 15:45:01 UTC
Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Hi,
Let's see where we are! :)
1-question poll:
http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/
Btw:
6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was:
60% 0.94
30% 0.96
10% 0.98
Another person said:
*Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98
rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96
within the next few months*
See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y
Thanks!
Otis
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Esteban, yup, I remember your comment from back then and your name :)
I think your observations were & are right. Surprising number of people
still on 0.94.
Bryan, yes, I see why people are still on 0.94.x. We were on it for a
looooong time, too, for the same reason. Sorry for the poor labeling. I
didn't mean to imply things with that, but it looks like I inadvertently
did.
Lars, true.... but we'll leave that for another poll :)
In the mean time, people, a few more votes, please:
http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/
Thanks,
Otis
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Esteban Gutierrez <es...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> Hey Otis,
>
> Thanks for doing that poll! BTW, the other person you are mentioning is me
> :)
>
> From what I've seen so far is that there stills a large base of 0.94
> deployments in production (30-40%) and mostly all of 0.96 clusters I saw
> around the time of that thread have moved to 0.98 (+50% on 0.98) or they
> are in the process to move to HBase 1.0
>
> cheers,
> esteban.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cloudera, Inc.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
> otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Let's see where we are! :)
> >
> > 1-question poll:
> > http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/
> >
> > Btw:
> > 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was:
> > 60% 0.94
> > 30% 0.96
> > 10% 0.98
> >
> > Another person said:
> >
> > *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98
> > rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96
> > within the next few months*
> >
> > See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Otis
> > --
> > Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
> >
>
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Posted by Esteban Gutierrez <es...@cloudera.com>.
Hey Otis,
Thanks for doing that poll! BTW, the other person you are mentioning is me
:)
>From what I've seen so far is that there stills a large base of 0.94
deployments in production (30-40%) and mostly all of 0.96 clusters I saw
around the time of that thread have moved to 0.98 (+50% on 0.98) or they
are in the process to move to HBase 1.0
cheers,
esteban.
--
Cloudera, Inc.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let's see where we are! :)
>
> 1-question poll:
> http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/
>
> Btw:
> 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was:
> 60% 0.94
> 30% 0.96
> 10% 0.98
>
> Another person said:
>
> *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98
> rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96
> within the next few months*
>
> See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y
>
> Thanks!
> Otis
> --
> Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
>
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I promised the results. Here they are, along with a short commentary:
http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/23/poll-results-hbase-version-distribution/
Otis
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis.gospodnetic@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let's see where we are! :)
>
> 1-question poll:
> http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/
>
> Btw:
> 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was:
> 60% 0.94
> 30% 0.96
> 10% 0.98
>
> Another person said:
>
> *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98
> rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96
> within the next few months*
>
> See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y
>
> Thanks!
> Otis
> --
> Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
>
>
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Posted by Bryan Beaudreault <bb...@hubspot.com>.
Super useful, thanks Dave!
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Dave Latham <la...@davelink.net> wrote:
> If you haven't already seen it - take a look at the bridge at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12814
> We're using it to go through the process now.
>
> Dave
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Bryan Beaudreault <
> bbeaudreault@hubspot.com
> > wrote:
>
> > My only complaint about this poll is the labels: "0.94.x - I like stable
> > releases". It's not really about the stable releases for me, it's more
> > about the extremely difficulty of overcoming "the singularity" from 0.94
> ->
> > 0.96+ with no downtime in a reasonably complex production system.
> > Hortonwork's replication bridge may help with this, and we're hoping to
> put
> > engineering effort into this sometime this year. But I'm sure I'm not
> the
> > only one for whom this is the sole reason to still be on 0.94.
> Otherwise I
> > can't wait for the features and bug fixes in later versions and would
> > welcome *any* tools or JIRAs to help soften the blow of this upgrade.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:09 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Realistically this should be weighed by number of machines.If you run a
> > > small 5 node cluster, sure, you can upgrade easily. But your vote does
> > not
> > > count as much as somebody who's running 1000 machines.
> > > -- Lars
> > > From: Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@gmail.com>
> > > To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <us...@hbase.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:45 AM
> > > Subject: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Let's see where we are! :)
> > >
> > > 1-question poll:
> > > http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/
> > >
> > > Btw:
> > > 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was:
> > > 60% 0.94
> > > 30% 0.96
> > > 10% 0.98
> > >
> > > Another person said:
> > >
> > > *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98
> > > rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96
> > > within the next few months*
> > >
> > > See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Otis
> > > --
> > > Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> > > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Posted by Dave Latham <la...@davelink.net>.
If you haven't already seen it - take a look at the bridge at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12814
We're using it to go through the process now.
Dave
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Bryan Beaudreault <bbeaudreault@hubspot.com
> wrote:
> My only complaint about this poll is the labels: "0.94.x - I like stable
> releases". It's not really about the stable releases for me, it's more
> about the extremely difficulty of overcoming "the singularity" from 0.94 ->
> 0.96+ with no downtime in a reasonably complex production system.
> Hortonwork's replication bridge may help with this, and we're hoping to put
> engineering effort into this sometime this year. But I'm sure I'm not the
> only one for whom this is the sole reason to still be on 0.94. Otherwise I
> can't wait for the features and bug fixes in later versions and would
> welcome *any* tools or JIRAs to help soften the blow of this upgrade.
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:09 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Realistically this should be weighed by number of machines.If you run a
> > small 5 node cluster, sure, you can upgrade easily. But your vote does
> not
> > count as much as somebody who's running 1000 machines.
> > -- Lars
> > From: Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@gmail.com>
> > To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <us...@hbase.apache.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:45 AM
> > Subject: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Let's see where we are! :)
> >
> > 1-question poll:
> > http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/
> >
> > Btw:
> > 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was:
> > 60% 0.94
> > 30% 0.96
> > 10% 0.98
> >
> > Another person said:
> >
> > *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98
> > rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96
> > within the next few months*
> >
> > See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Otis
> > --
> > Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Posted by Bryan Beaudreault <bb...@hubspot.com>.
My only complaint about this poll is the labels: "0.94.x - I like stable
releases". It's not really about the stable releases for me, it's more
about the extremely difficulty of overcoming "the singularity" from 0.94 ->
0.96+ with no downtime in a reasonably complex production system.
Hortonwork's replication bridge may help with this, and we're hoping to put
engineering effort into this sometime this year. But I'm sure I'm not the
only one for whom this is the sole reason to still be on 0.94. Otherwise I
can't wait for the features and bug fixes in later versions and would
welcome *any* tools or JIRAs to help soften the blow of this upgrade.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:09 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote:
> Realistically this should be weighed by number of machines.If you run a
> small 5 node cluster, sure, you can upgrade easily. But your vote does not
> count as much as somebody who's running 1000 machines.
> -- Lars
> From: Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@gmail.com>
> To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <us...@hbase.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:45 AM
> Subject: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
>
> Hi,
>
> Let's see where we are! :)
>
> 1-question poll:
> http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/
>
> Btw:
> 6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was:
> 60% 0.94
> 30% 0.96
> 10% 0.98
>
> Another person said:
>
> *Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98
> rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96
> within the next few months*
>
> See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y
>
> Thanks!
> Otis
> --
> Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
>
Re: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Posted by lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>.
Realistically this should be weighed by number of machines.If you run a small 5 node cluster, sure, you can upgrade easily. But your vote does not count as much as somebody who's running 1000 machines.
-- Lars
From: Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@gmail.com>
To: "user@hbase.apache.org" <us...@hbase.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:45 AM
Subject: Poll: HBase usage by HBase version
Hi,
Let's see where we are! :)
1-question poll:
http://blog.sematext.com/2015/03/11/hbase-poll-version/
Btw:
6 months ago the guess was that HBase version usage distribution was:
60% 0.94
30% 0.96
10% 0.98
Another person said:
*Now that 0.96 has been EOL'd you should see users migrating to 0.98
rapidly, so the number should be more like 50% 0.94, 40% 0.98 10% 0.96
within the next few months*
See http://search-hadoop.com/m/DHED4VXL6y
Thanks!
Otis
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/