You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by sebb <se...@gmail.com> on 2021/04/22 23:04:43 UTC
Move Proxy to dormant?
There has been no substantial development for several years, and only
two open JIRA feature requests.
The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
Is it worth spending any time on this component?
I suspect it should go dormant.
Sebb.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: Move Proxy to dormant?
Posted by "Bruno P. Kinoshita" <ki...@apache.org>.
I think it probably should go to dormant. I had a look at found a few users in mvnrepository [1] and from random internet search [2][3][4]
But no activity as you pointed, and I think we can move it back to proper later if there's interest from users/devs later. So +1
Bruno
[1] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.commons/commons-proxy/usages?p=1
[2] https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/blob/c1465cea9f5a4dcb36ed7a531d080a74d01c74fb/src/main/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/databind/jsontype/impl/SubTypeValidator.java#L184-L185
[3] https://github.com/apache/sirona/blob/192ba25c8951185367a5c54ffb34d4702a4e15ac/agent/performance/aop/src/main/java/org/apache/sirona/aop/SironaProxyFactory.java#L19-L20
[4] https://github.com/apache/commons-digester/blob/51bd9554c53a965f98d13d3b44cea33265c6bea2/core/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester3/RecordedInvocation.java#L25-L26
On Friday, 23 April 2021, 11:06:17 am NZST, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
There has been no substantial development for several years, and only
two open JIRA feature requests.
The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
Is it worth spending any time on this component?
I suspect it should go dormant.
Sebb.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: Move Proxy to dormant?
Posted by Emmanuel Bourg <eb...@apache.org>.
Le 23/04/2021 à 01:04, sebb a écrit :
> There has been no substantial development for several years, and only
> two open JIRA feature requests.
>
> The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
>
> Is it worth spending any time on this component?
>
> I suspect it should go dormant.
+1
Emmanuel Bourg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: Move Proxy to dormant?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1 (even if a bit sad but it is what it is).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le mar. 27 avr. 2021 à 13:17, sebb <se...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> I propose to move Proxy to dormant later this week unless anyone steps
> up to fix the website etc.
>
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 18:13, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:35, Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > FWIW, my recollection is that proxy was ready for a 2.0 release which
> was
> > > vetoed on the basis that the site didn't contain a migration how-to
> > > document. Oh well.
> >
> > I don't think it was vetoed, but it looks like there were only 2 +1
> votes:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45e87021355c0c1ae1d0b6d1db601bf33a2aecaad0ee240dc0d2e1ca%401396900218%40%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Given that there have been no significant activity or enquiries since
> > then, I wonder if it is worth the effort. As a minimum the site would
> > need to be rebuilt, dependencies updated etc.
> >
> > Sebb.
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 4:07 PM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sounds reasonable to me.
> > > >
> > > > Gary
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 16:09 sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > There has been no substantial development for several years, and
> only
> > > > > two open JIRA feature requests.
> > > > >
> > > > > The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it worth spending any time on this component?
> > > > >
> > > > > I suspect it should go dormant.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sebb.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: Move Proxy to dormant?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
This did not happen at the time, but there has been little activity
since then, and the code does not even build (circular reference in
pom, and old Maven required).
I'll try again.
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 13:54, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Seems reasonable.
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021, 07:16 sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I propose to move Proxy to dormant later this week unless anyone steps
> > up to fix the website etc.
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 18:13, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:35, Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > FWIW, my recollection is that proxy was ready for a 2.0 release which
> > was
> > > > vetoed on the basis that the site didn't contain a migration how-to
> > > > document. Oh well.
> > >
> > > I don't think it was vetoed, but it looks like there were only 2 +1
> > votes:
> > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45e87021355c0c1ae1d0b6d1db601bf33a2aecaad0ee240dc0d2e1ca%401396900218%40%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > Given that there have been no significant activity or enquiries since
> > > then, I wonder if it is worth the effort. As a minimum the site would
> > > need to be rebuilt, dependencies updated etc.
> > >
> > > Sebb.
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 4:07 PM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Sounds reasonable to me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 16:09 sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > There has been no substantial development for several years, and
> > only
> > > > > > two open JIRA feature requests.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is it worth spending any time on this component?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I suspect it should go dormant.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sebb.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: Move Proxy to dormant?
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
Seems reasonable.
Gary
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021, 07:16 sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I propose to move Proxy to dormant later this week unless anyone steps
> up to fix the website etc.
>
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 18:13, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:35, Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > FWIW, my recollection is that proxy was ready for a 2.0 release which
> was
> > > vetoed on the basis that the site didn't contain a migration how-to
> > > document. Oh well.
> >
> > I don't think it was vetoed, but it looks like there were only 2 +1
> votes:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45e87021355c0c1ae1d0b6d1db601bf33a2aecaad0ee240dc0d2e1ca%401396900218%40%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Given that there have been no significant activity or enquiries since
> > then, I wonder if it is worth the effort. As a minimum the site would
> > need to be rebuilt, dependencies updated etc.
> >
> > Sebb.
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 4:07 PM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sounds reasonable to me.
> > > >
> > > > Gary
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 16:09 sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > There has been no substantial development for several years, and
> only
> > > > > two open JIRA feature requests.
> > > > >
> > > > > The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it worth spending any time on this component?
> > > > >
> > > > > I suspect it should go dormant.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sebb.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
Re: Move Proxy to dormant?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
I propose to move Proxy to dormant later this week unless anyone steps
up to fix the website etc.
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 18:13, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:35, Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, my recollection is that proxy was ready for a 2.0 release which was
> > vetoed on the basis that the site didn't contain a migration how-to
> > document. Oh well.
>
> I don't think it was vetoed, but it looks like there were only 2 +1 votes:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45e87021355c0c1ae1d0b6d1db601bf33a2aecaad0ee240dc0d2e1ca%401396900218%40%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E
>
> Given that there have been no significant activity or enquiries since
> then, I wonder if it is worth the effort. As a minimum the site would
> need to be rebuilt, dependencies updated etc.
>
> Sebb.
>
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 4:07 PM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds reasonable to me.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 16:09 sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There has been no substantial development for several years, and only
> > > > two open JIRA feature requests.
> > > >
> > > > The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
> > > >
> > > > Is it worth spending any time on this component?
> > > >
> > > > I suspect it should go dormant.
> > > >
> > > > Sebb.
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: Move Proxy to dormant?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:35, Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> FWIW, my recollection is that proxy was ready for a 2.0 release which was
> vetoed on the basis that the site didn't contain a migration how-to
> document. Oh well.
I don't think it was vetoed, but it looks like there were only 2 +1 votes:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45e87021355c0c1ae1d0b6d1db601bf33a2aecaad0ee240dc0d2e1ca%401396900218%40%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E
Given that there have been no significant activity or enquiries since
then, I wonder if it is worth the effort. As a minimum the site would
need to be rebuilt, dependencies updated etc.
Sebb.
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 4:07 PM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sounds reasonable to me.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 16:09 sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > There has been no substantial development for several years, and only
> > > two open JIRA feature requests.
> > >
> > > The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
> > >
> > > Is it worth spending any time on this component?
> > >
> > > I suspect it should go dormant.
> > >
> > > Sebb.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: Move Proxy to dormant?
Posted by Matt Benson <mb...@apache.org>.
FWIW, my recollection is that proxy was ready for a 2.0 release which was
vetoed on the basis that the site didn't contain a migration how-to
document. Oh well.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 4:07 PM Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds reasonable to me.
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 16:09 sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There has been no substantial development for several years, and only
> > two open JIRA feature requests.
> >
> > The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
> >
> > Is it worth spending any time on this component?
> >
> > I suspect it should go dormant.
> >
> > Sebb.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: Move Proxy to dormant?
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
Sounds reasonable to me.
Gary
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 16:09 sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There has been no substantial development for several years, and only
> two open JIRA feature requests.
>
> The website is outdated, and needs regeneration.
>
> Is it worth spending any time on this component?
>
> I suspect it should go dormant.
>
> Sebb.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>