You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com> on 2007/05/17 00:40:33 UTC
Continuum - TCK task - feasible ?
Would it be feasible to have a Continuum task that runs the TCK against the
current build ? Then we'd know if anything we've done has broken TCK
compliance. Is our zone even powerful enough to run the TCK ? I seem to
remember it being a huge memory and resource hog. Of course, the other
aspect to keep in mind is visibility to NDA signers only, etc.
Thoughts ?
--
Grant Smith
Re: Continuum - TCK task - feasible ?
Posted by Dennis Byrne <de...@dbyrne.net>.
Thanks Paul. This would be great.
Dennis Byrne
On 5/17/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There has been a lot of progress towards automating TCK runs in the
> Geronimo project. The automation framework produces very detailed
> reports and graphs broken down by component, one of those components
> being JSF. The Geronimo project has a process in place for
> providing access to ASF committers who have signed the NDA.
>
> Now that JSF is part of the Java EE specification and Geronimo (a
> Java EE server) uses MyFaces for JSF, I think it would make sense to
> streamline our efforts here. Do others agree? If so then I can
> follow up with the Geronimo devs to see if there's interest.
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On May 16, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Grant Smith wrote:
>
> > Would it be feasible to have a Continuum task that runs the TCK
> > against the current build ? Then we'd know if anything we've done
> > has broken TCK compliance. Is our zone even powerful enough to run
> > the TCK ? I seem to remember it being a huge memory and resource
> > hog. Of course, the other aspect to keep in mind is visibility to
> > NDA signers only, etc.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > --
> > Grant Smith
>
>
--
Dennis Byrne
Re: Continuum - TCK task - feasible ?
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
I would definitely be in favor of this. It would be great to see how you
automate the TCK runs, and how the results are reported.
On 5/17/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There has been a lot of progress towards automating TCK runs in the
> Geronimo project. The automation framework produces very detailed
> reports and graphs broken down by component, one of those components
> being JSF. The Geronimo project has a process in place for
> providing access to ASF committers who have signed the NDA.
>
> Now that JSF is part of the Java EE specification and Geronimo (a
> Java EE server) uses MyFaces for JSF, I think it would make sense to
> streamline our efforts here. Do others agree? If so then I can
> follow up with the Geronimo devs to see if there's interest.
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On May 16, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Grant Smith wrote:
>
> > Would it be feasible to have a Continuum task that runs the TCK
> > against the current build ? Then we'd know if anything we've done
> > has broken TCK compliance. Is our zone even powerful enough to run
> > the TCK ? I seem to remember it being a huge memory and resource
> > hog. Of course, the other aspect to keep in mind is visibility to
> > NDA signers only, etc.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > --
> > Grant Smith
>
>
--
Grant Smith
Re: Continuum - TCK task - feasible ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
that sounds cool
On 5/17/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There has been a lot of progress towards automating TCK runs in the
> Geronimo project. The automation framework produces very detailed
> reports and graphs broken down by component, one of those components
> being JSF. The Geronimo project has a process in place for
> providing access to ASF committers who have signed the NDA.
>
> Now that JSF is part of the Java EE specification and Geronimo (a
> Java EE server) uses MyFaces for JSF, I think it would make sense to
> streamline our efforts here. Do others agree? If so then I can
> follow up with the Geronimo devs to see if there's interest.
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On May 16, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Grant Smith wrote:
>
> > Would it be feasible to have a Continuum task that runs the TCK
> > against the current build ? Then we'd know if anything we've done
> > has broken TCK compliance. Is our zone even powerful enough to run
> > the TCK ? I seem to remember it being a huge memory and resource
> > hog. Of course, the other aspect to keep in mind is visibility to
> > NDA signers only, etc.
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > --
> > Grant Smith
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: Continuum - TCK task - feasible ?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
There has been a lot of progress towards automating TCK runs in the
Geronimo project. The automation framework produces very detailed
reports and graphs broken down by component, one of those components
being JSF. The Geronimo project has a process in place for
providing access to ASF committers who have signed the NDA.
Now that JSF is part of the Java EE specification and Geronimo (a
Java EE server) uses MyFaces for JSF, I think it would make sense to
streamline our efforts here. Do others agree? If so then I can
follow up with the Geronimo devs to see if there's interest.
Best wishes,
Paul
On May 16, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Grant Smith wrote:
> Would it be feasible to have a Continuum task that runs the TCK
> against the current build ? Then we'd know if anything we've done
> has broken TCK compliance. Is our zone even powerful enough to run
> the TCK ? I seem to remember it being a huge memory and resource
> hog. Of course, the other aspect to keep in mind is visibility to
> NDA signers only, etc.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Grant Smith