You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> on 2007/07/13 03:53:06 UTC
bundle plugin behavior with transitive dependencies
Seems that in last versions the bundle goal ignores transitive
dependencies, so you have to explicitly add all of the ones you want
to bundle.
Is this supposed to behave like that or I messed up in one of my patches?
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
Re: bundle plugin behavior with transitive dependencies
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> yes, my question is, should it bundle all transitive dependencies or not?
> when you bundle commons, and all the other libraries what is the
> expected behaviour?
I have no idea, since I am not a user of this feature. I was under the
impression that it did do all of the transitive dependencies, but
perhaps someone who uses this feature should respond.
-> richard
>
> On 7/13/07, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>> Carlos Sanchez wrote:
>> > Seems that in last versions the bundle goal ignores transitive
>> > dependencies, so you have to explicitly add all of the ones you want
>> > to bundle.
>> >
>> > Is this supposed to behave like that or I messed up in one of my
>> patches?
>>
>> I think you are the only one working on the bundle goal, no? If so, then
>> it must be one of your patches. Check it out and get back with us ASAP
>> otherwise it will miss the 1.0 release.
>>
>> -> richard
>>
>
>
Re: bundle plugin behavior with transitive dependencies
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
yes, my question is, should it bundle all transitive dependencies or not?
when you bundle commons, and all the other libraries what is the
expected behaviour?
On 7/13/07, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
> Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> > Seems that in last versions the bundle goal ignores transitive
> > dependencies, so you have to explicitly add all of the ones you want
> > to bundle.
> >
> > Is this supposed to behave like that or I messed up in one of my patches?
>
> I think you are the only one working on the bundle goal, no? If so, then
> it must be one of your patches. Check it out and get back with us ASAP
> otherwise it will miss the 1.0 release.
>
> -> richard
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
Re: bundle plugin behavior with transitive dependencies
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Seems that in last versions the bundle goal ignores transitive
> dependencies, so you have to explicitly add all of the ones you want
> to bundle.
>
> Is this supposed to behave like that or I messed up in one of my patches?
I think you are the only one working on the bundle goal, no? If so, then
it must be one of your patches. Check it out and get back with us ASAP
otherwise it will miss the 1.0 release.
-> richard