You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@hotwaxsystems.com> on 2017/05/10 06:24:40 UTC
Preparing the new release 16.11.02
I think it is time to publish a new release out of 16.11 branch; the last
(and first) was released on November 2016.
What do you think?
Jacopo
Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
I'd say that as long as no clear decision has been taken at LEGAL-288 we can continue as is.
Jacques
Le 15/05/2017 à 16:36, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> ok, great, I am preparing the release files for the vote.
> The only remaining topic we should discuss is if we should keep the Gradle
> Wrapper jar as we did before (while we wait for a final answer from Legal)
> or if we prefer to remove it from the release and add a mention to the
> README file.
>
> Jacopo
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
>
>> I split the tools with OFBIZ-9256
>>
>> So I have nothing else important pending and a new release is OK with me
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> Le 11/05/2017 à 11:45, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>
>>> I'd like to split the tools folder, I planned it for months but delayed :/
>>>
>>> It's of course not blocking and I have nothing important else pending.
>>>
>>> Ah, I'd like to see why the Birt orders reports have disappeared
>>> https://s.apache.org/HUdV
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 10/05/2017 à 08:24, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I think it is time to publish a new release out of 16.11 branch; the last
>>>> (and first) was released on November 2016.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@hotwaxsystems.com>.
ok, great, I am preparing the release files for the vote.
The only remaining topic we should discuss is if we should keep the Gradle
Wrapper jar as we did before (while we wait for a final answer from Legal)
or if we prefer to remove it from the release and add a mention to the
README file.
Jacopo
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
> I split the tools with OFBIZ-9256
>
> So I have nothing else important pending and a new release is OK with me
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 11/05/2017 à 11:45, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>
>> I'd like to split the tools folder, I planned it for months but delayed :/
>>
>> It's of course not blocking and I have nothing important else pending.
>>
>> Ah, I'd like to see why the Birt orders reports have disappeared
>> https://s.apache.org/HUdV
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> Le 10/05/2017 à 08:24, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>
>>> I think it is time to publish a new release out of 16.11 branch; the last
>>> (and first) was released on November 2016.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
I split the tools with OFBIZ-9256
So I have nothing else important pending and a new release is OK with me
Jacques
Le 11/05/2017 à 11:45, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> I'd like to split the tools folder, I planned it for months but delayed :/
>
> It's of course not blocking and I have nothing important else pending.
>
> Ah, I'd like to see why the Birt orders reports have disappeared https://s.apache.org/HUdV
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 10/05/2017 à 08:24, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>> I think it is time to publish a new release out of 16.11 branch; the last
>> (and first) was released on November 2016.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>
>
Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
This https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9256
Le 11/05/2017 à 11:54, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
> split the tools folder from 16.11? This kind of change belongs in Trunk no?
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to split the tools folder, I planned it for months but delayed :/
>>
>> It's of course not blocking and I have nothing important else pending.
>>
>> Ah, I'd like to see why the Birt orders reports have disappeared
>> https://s.apache.org/HUdV
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 10/05/2017 à 08:24, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>>
>>> I think it is time to publish a new release out of 16.11 branch; the last
>>> (and first) was released on November 2016.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>>
Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02
Posted by Taher Alkhateeb <sl...@gmail.com>.
split the tools folder from 16.11? This kind of change belongs in Trunk no?
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
> I'd like to split the tools folder, I planned it for months but delayed :/
>
> It's of course not blocking and I have nothing important else pending.
>
> Ah, I'd like to see why the Birt orders reports have disappeared
> https://s.apache.org/HUdV
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> Le 10/05/2017 à 08:24, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
>
>> I think it is time to publish a new release out of 16.11 branch; the last
>> (and first) was released on November 2016.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>
>
Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Le 11/05/2017 à 11:45, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> Ah, I'd like to see why the Birt orders reports have disappeared https://s.apache.org/HUdV
>
> Jacques
Fixed with OFBIZ-9359
Jacques
Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
I'd like to split the tools folder, I planned it for months but delayed :/
It's of course not blocking and I have nothing important else pending.
Ah, I'd like to see why the Birt orders reports have disappeared https://s.apache.org/HUdV
Jacques
Le 10/05/2017 à 08:24, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> I think it is time to publish a new release out of 16.11 branch; the last
> (and first) was released on November 2016.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jacopo
>
Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02
Posted by Taher Alkhateeb <sl...@gmail.com>.
- All tests pass on my computer
- Smoke tests on the system show normal operation across the accounting
screens and webtools.
- I got an error on
https://localhost:8443/accounting/control/PaymentAcctgTransEntriesPdf?paymentId=8003
HTTP 500, but I believe it also existed on the first release.
Given that we also made a critical correction on the StartupControlPanel
(updating server state on start) I would say we need to go ahead and make
this release ASAP.
So +1
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappellato@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> I think it is time to publish a new release out of 16.11 branch; the last
> (and first) was released on November 2016.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jacopo
>
Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02
Posted by Deepak Dixit <de...@hotwaxsystems.com>.
+1
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
www.hotwaxsystems.com
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Michael Brohl <mi...@ecomify.de>
wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> I think a new release is a good idea!
>
> Taher gave his +1 so I guess there are no open issues regarding the
> rafactoring which could go to a new release shortly.
>
> To all: do we have any work in progress open which can be finished soon
> and go to the new release?
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
> Am 10.05.17 um 08:24 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
>
> I think it is time to publish a new release out of 16.11 branch; the last
>> (and first) was released on November 2016.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Preparing the new release 16.11.02
Posted by Michael Brohl <mi...@ecomify.de>.
Hi Jacopo,
I think a new release is a good idea!
Taher gave his +1 so I guess there are no open issues regarding the
rafactoring which could go to a new release shortly.
To all: do we have any work in progress open which can be finished soon
and go to the new release?
Regards,
Michael
Am 10.05.17 um 08:24 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
> I think it is time to publish a new release out of 16.11 branch; the last
> (and first) was released on November 2016.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jacopo
>