Best configuration for production

[Antonio Fallucchi <af...@ideato.it>]

Hi,

could you tell me what is the best configuration for jackarabbit in
production?

Jackarabbit Standalone
Jackarabbit + tomcat + mysql persistent
other..

Thanks!


-- 
Antonio Giuseppe Fallucchi
System Administrator and Security Specialist
Ideato

af@ideato.it
Mobile: +39-347-4065233
Skype: fallucch

ideato srl - web ideas for sale
http://www.ideato.it
Phone: (+39) 0547 480114
Fax:     (+39) 0547 19 50 205
via Giulio Pastore, 151
47522 Cesena (FC)

"Questo messaggio è destinato unicamente alla/e persona/e sopraindicata/e.
E' strettamente personale e può contenere informazioni la cui riservatezza
è tutelata dalla normativa ai sensi del DLgs 196/03. E' espressamente
vietato alla/e persona/e non destinataria/e leggere, copiare o comunque
usare questo messaggio o diffonderne il contenuto senza autorizzazione. Chi
ha ricevuto per errore questo fax o messaggio è pregato di distruggerlo e
di avvertire per telefono o fax o email, il mittente."

Re: Best configuration for production

[Lukas Kahwe Smith <sm...@pooteeweet.org>]

On 03 Mar 2014, at 14:54, Antonio Fallucchi <af...@ideato.it> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> could you tell me what is the best configuration for jackarabbit in
> production?
> 
> Jackarabbit Standalone
> Jackarabbit + tomcat + mysql persistent
> other..

Generally standalone isn’t recommended though I have seen it work quite well in production. Using a container can also ease deployment, which is especially useful for shops that have some experience in running Java setups.

regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
smith@pooteeweet.org

Re: Best configuration for production

[Jaroslaw Marek <ja...@gmail.com>]

Hi,
Deploying Jackrabbit webapp in our own container (Tomcat) gives us 
possibility to have a full control over it's configuration.

Moreover on http://jackrabbit.apache.org/standalone-server.html it says 
that:
" The Jackrabbit Standalone server is designed primarily as a quick and 
easy way to get a content repository up and running for testing and 
development purposes. For more complex deployment scenarios and 
configuration options you should look at the Jackrabbit Web Application 
and Jackrabbit JCA Resource Adapter packages."

On 03/14/2014 10:10 AM, AshokBS wrote:
> Hi Jarek,
>
> Is Jackrabbit standalone same as using webapp? Any advantages or
> disadvantages using it?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Best-configuration-for-production-tp4660402p4660525.html
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Best configuration for production

[AshokBS <as...@altimetrik.com>]

Hi Jarek,

Is Jackrabbit standalone same as using webapp? Any advantages or
disadvantages using it?



--
View this message in context: http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Best-configuration-for-production-tp4660402p4660525.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Best configuration for production

[Jaroslaw Marek <ja...@gmail.com>]

On 03/03/2014 02:54 PM, Antonio Fallucchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you tell me what is the best configuration for jackarabbit in
> production?
>
> Jackarabbit Standalone
> Jackarabbit + tomcat + mysql persistent
> other..
>
> Thanks!
>
>
Hi,
I don't know if it's the best configuration for production, but we use 
Jackrabbit webapp on tomcat in clustered configuration (2 nodes) backed 
up with Oracle DB serving content via WebDAV. It hasn't been used that 
extensively yet, but seems to be working fine.

Regards,
Jarek