custom RuntimeConfigurationBuilder

[ant elder <an...@gmail.com>]

Still trying to get a new component type to work, right now I can't see how
to get my new RuntimeConfigurationBuilder impl picked up.

In o.a.t.core.context.impl.TuscanyModuleComponentContextImpl in the start
method its hard coded with the class name "
org.apache.tuscany.container.java.builder.JavaComponentContextBuilder":

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/core/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/core/context/impl/TuscanyModuleComponentContextImpl.java

There is a FIXME comment saying "come up with a better configuration for
this".

Does this mean right now its impossible to implement new component types?

Thanks,

   ...ant

Re: custom RuntimeConfigurationBuilder

[Jim Marino <jm...@myroma.net>]

This is going to be changed once we do the cutover to the aggregate  
context stuff. Part of the problem with TMCCImpl is that it "news" up  
a bunch of classes that should be provided through configuration/ 
injection. In the new way of doing things, builders will be special  
system components that are provided to the runtime. This is already  
implemented in the unit tests. For specifics, I would start with the  
description of "architecture" and "assembly" in my sandbox (/sandbox/ 
jim) and then look at the unit tests in o.a.t.core.system under [core  
project]src/test/java.

I'm interested in getting feedback on this so if you can start with  
that and send questions/comments as they arise to the list. it would  
be much appreciated.

Jim


On Jan 20, 2006, at 8:40 AM, ant elder wrote:

> Still trying to get a new component type to work, right now I can't  
> see how
> to get my new RuntimeConfigurationBuilder impl picked up.
>
> In o.a.t.core.context.impl.TuscanyModuleComponentContextImpl in the  
> start
> method its hard coded with the class name "
> org.apache.tuscany.container.java.builder.JavaComponentContextBuilder" 
> :
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/core/src/ 
> main/java/org/apache/tuscany/core/context/impl/ 
> TuscanyModuleComponentContextImpl.java
>
> There is a FIXME comment saying "come up with a better  
> configuration for
> this".
>
> Does this mean right now its impossible to implement new component  
> types?
>
> Thanks,
>
>    ...ant
>