You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org> on 2007/06/25 18:11:11 UTC
OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
Hi,
I am sending this to the G and OEJB lists.
We have dependencies on OpenJPA SNAPSHOT in trunk. Looks like they
moved to jaxb 2.1 and this is causing troubles with building.
First its having trouble finding javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:1.0-2,
and second, I am fairly confident this is going to impact certification.
Thoughts?
Jeff
Re: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
I think they need to push a SNAP...the current one is still stuck on
JAXB 2.1.
Jeff
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
> I think that they just added the dep within the past couple of weeks to
> support having an xml datastore.
>
> I just saw on the OpenJPA list that they think that they could go back
> to jaxb-2.0.2.
>
> Would that clear up questions on certification?
>
> Jay
>
> David Blevins wrote:
>> I forwarded them your note and also went digging in scm archives as to
>> why they added it. We'll see what they say.
>>
>> Have you tried adding an exclude on jaxb in the openjpa dep? And for
>> the openejb dep we could exclude openjpa itself.
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am sending this to the G and OEJB lists.
>>>
>>> We have dependencies on OpenJPA SNAPSHOT in trunk. Looks like they
>>> moved to jaxb 2.1 and this is causing troubles with building.
>>>
>>> First its having trouble finding javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:1.0-2,
>>> and second, I am fairly confident this is going to impact certification.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
Re: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
Posted by "Jay D. McHugh" <ja...@joyfulnoisewebdesign.com>.
I think that they just added the dep within the past couple of weeks to
support having an xml datastore.
I just saw on the OpenJPA list that they think that they could go back
to jaxb-2.0.2.
Would that clear up questions on certification?
Jay
David Blevins wrote:
> I forwarded them your note and also went digging in scm archives as to
> why they added it. We'll see what they say.
>
> Have you tried adding an exclude on jaxb in the openjpa dep? And for
> the openejb dep we could exclude openjpa itself.
>
> -David
>
> On Jun 25, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am sending this to the G and OEJB lists.
>>
>> We have dependencies on OpenJPA SNAPSHOT in trunk. Looks like they
>> moved to jaxb 2.1 and this is causing troubles with building.
>>
>> First its having trouble finding javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:1.0-2,
>> and second, I am fairly confident this is going to impact certification.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>
>
>
> .
>
Re: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
I forwarded them your note and also went digging in scm archives as
to why they added it. We'll see what they say.
Have you tried adding an exclude on jaxb in the openjpa dep? And for
the openejb dep we could exclude openjpa itself.
-David
On Jun 25, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sending this to the G and OEJB lists.
>
> We have dependencies on OpenJPA SNAPSHOT in trunk. Looks like they
> moved to jaxb 2.1 and this is causing troubles with building.
>
> First its having trouble finding javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:1.0-2,
> and second, I am fairly confident this is going to impact
> certification.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Jeff
>
Re: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
Posted by catalina wei <ca...@gmail.com>.
David,
The jaxb dependency is changed to jaxb 2.0 by David Wisneski.
Catalina
On 6/25/07, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:08 AM, catalina wei wrote:
>
> > David,
> > My XMLMaping test cases run with jaxb 2.0.2.
> > Would jaxb dependency change to jaxb 2.0.2 work for you ?
>
> I think that will work, thanks. Geronimo is using 2.0.5. Not sure
> which version EasyBeans/JOnAS may be using.
>
> -David
>
>
> > Catalina
> >
> > On 6/25/07, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey guys, figured this thread belonged here. See below.
> >>
> >> I looked through the archives to see what the change related to and
> >> it looks like OPENJPA-240 was it. If we found a way in Geronimo to
> >> force OpenJPA back onto jaxb 2.0 so we could continue to certify
> >> javaee6 would things still work sans this feature?
> >>
> >> Also, any idea how much longer it may be for a 1.0.0 release?
> >>
> >> I know it's tough to balance user and integrator needs, so thanks in
> >> advance for any help.
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >>
> >> > Resent-From: <db...@visi.com>
> >> > From: Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>
> >> > Date: June 25, 2007 9:11:11 AM PDT
> >> > To: dev@openejb.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org
> >> > Subject: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
> >> > Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> >> > Reply-To: jgenender@apache.org
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I am sending this to the G and OEJB lists.
> >> >
> >> > We have dependencies on OpenJPA SNAPSHOT in trunk. Looks like they
> >> > moved to jaxb 2.1 and this is causing troubles with building.
> >> >
> >> > First its having trouble finding javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:
> >> 1.0-2,
> >> > and second, I am fairly confident this is going to impact
> >> > certification.
> >> >
> >> > Thoughts?
> >> >
> >> > Jeff
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:08 AM, catalina wei wrote:
> David,
> My XMLMaping test cases run with jaxb 2.0.2.
> Would jaxb dependency change to jaxb 2.0.2 work for you ?
I think that will work, thanks. Geronimo is using 2.0.5. Not sure
which version EasyBeans/JOnAS may be using.
-David
> Catalina
>
> On 6/25/07, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys, figured this thread belonged here. See below.
>>
>> I looked through the archives to see what the change related to and
>> it looks like OPENJPA-240 was it. If we found a way in Geronimo to
>> force OpenJPA back onto jaxb 2.0 so we could continue to certify
>> javaee6 would things still work sans this feature?
>>
>> Also, any idea how much longer it may be for a 1.0.0 release?
>>
>> I know it's tough to balance user and integrator needs, so thanks in
>> advance for any help.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> > Resent-From: <db...@visi.com>
>> > From: Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>
>> > Date: June 25, 2007 9:11:11 AM PDT
>> > To: dev@openejb.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> > Subject: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
>> > Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> > Reply-To: jgenender@apache.org
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am sending this to the G and OEJB lists.
>> >
>> > We have dependencies on OpenJPA SNAPSHOT in trunk. Looks like they
>> > moved to jaxb 2.1 and this is causing troubles with building.
>> >
>> > First its having trouble finding javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:
>> 1.0-2,
>> > and second, I am fairly confident this is going to impact
>> > certification.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Jeff
>> >
>>
>>
Re: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
Posted by catalina wei <ca...@gmail.com>.
David,
My XMLMaping test cases run with jaxb 2.0.2.
Would jaxb dependency change to jaxb 2.0.2 work for you ?
Catalina
On 6/25/07, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
>
> Hey guys, figured this thread belonged here. See below.
>
> I looked through the archives to see what the change related to and
> it looks like OPENJPA-240 was it. If we found a way in Geronimo to
> force OpenJPA back onto jaxb 2.0 so we could continue to certify
> javaee6 would things still work sans this feature?
>
> Also, any idea how much longer it may be for a 1.0.0 release?
>
> I know it's tough to balance user and integrator needs, so thanks in
> advance for any help.
>
> -David
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > Resent-From: <db...@visi.com>
> > From: Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>
> > Date: June 25, 2007 9:11:11 AM PDT
> > To: dev@openejb.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org
> > Subject: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
> > Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> > Reply-To: jgenender@apache.org
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am sending this to the G and OEJB lists.
> >
> > We have dependencies on OpenJPA SNAPSHOT in trunk. Looks like they
> > moved to jaxb 2.1 and this is causing troubles with building.
> >
> > First its having trouble finding javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:1.0-2,
> > and second, I am fairly confident this is going to impact
> > certification.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Jeff
> >
>
>
Re: Fwd: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
Posted by Florent BENOIT <Fl...@objectweb.org>.
Hi,
Yes, it would be great to have a release with JAXB 2.0 before using JAXB
2.1 in the OpenJPA trunk.
We're in the same situation if we want to use OpenJPA in ObjectWeb
EasyBeans/JOnAS.
We're stuck with the 1.0.0 SNAPSHOT release as the 0.9.7 release was not
working within EasyBeans (bugs fixed in the snapshot version).
And no release was done since a couple of months.
We use different persistence providers for integration tests and the
dependency on JAXB 2.1 is a problem.
Regards,
Florent
David Blevins wrote:
> Hey guys, figured this thread belonged here. See below.
>
> I looked through the archives to see what the change related to and it
> looks like OPENJPA-240 was it. If we found a way in Geronimo to force
> OpenJPA back onto jaxb 2.0 so we could continue to certify javaee6
> would things still work sans this feature?
>
> Also, any idea how much longer it may be for a 1.0.0 release?
>
> I know it's tough to balance user and integrator needs, so thanks in
> advance for any help.
>
> -David
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> Resent-From: <db...@visi.com>
>> From: Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>
>> Date: June 25, 2007 9:11:11 AM PDT
>> To: dev@openejb.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> Subject: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
>> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> Reply-To: jgenender@apache.org
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am sending this to the G and OEJB lists.
>>
>> We have dependencies on OpenJPA SNAPSHOT in trunk. Looks like they
>> moved to jaxb 2.1 and this is causing troubles with building.
>>
>> First its having trouble finding javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:1.0-2,
>> and second, I am fairly confident this is going to impact certification.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>
>
Fwd: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Hey guys, figured this thread belonged here. See below.
I looked through the archives to see what the change related to and
it looks like OPENJPA-240 was it. If we found a way in Geronimo to
force OpenJPA back onto jaxb 2.0 so we could continue to certify
javaee6 would things still work sans this feature?
Also, any idea how much longer it may be for a 1.0.0 release?
I know it's tough to balance user and integrator needs, so thanks in
advance for any help.
-David
Begin forwarded message:
> Resent-From: <db...@visi.com>
> From: Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>
> Date: June 25, 2007 9:11:11 AM PDT
> To: dev@openejb.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: OpenJPA moved to JAXB 2.1 and this is gonna cause trouble
> Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Reply-To: jgenender@apache.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I am sending this to the G and OEJB lists.
>
> We have dependencies on OpenJPA SNAPSHOT in trunk. Looks like they
> moved to jaxb 2.1 and this is causing troubles with building.
>
> First its having trouble finding javax.xml.stream:stax-api:jar:1.0-2,
> and second, I am fairly confident this is going to impact
> certification.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Jeff
>