You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/06/04 01:20:32 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27966] -
Expect: 100-continue not honored for Content-Length: 0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27966>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27966
Expect: 100-continue not honored for Content-Length: 0
jorton@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From jorton@redhat.com 2004-06-03 23:20 -------
Interesting... my interpretation of 2616: the "MAY omit a 100 (Continue)"
clause is pointless if it does not modify the "MUST"/"MUST NOT" requirements;
i.e. it explicitly makes it valid for an origin server omit a 100 continue
response if all of the body has already been received. What other meaning
could the clause have? By that interpretation, 2.0's behaviour is compliant
with 2616 for the "C-L: 0" case, and it seems reasonable.
I'd ask the httpwg list for clarification if you're really convinced this is
wrong; please re-open the bug report if httpwg agrees with you. :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org