You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> on 2014/03/18 00:46:21 UTC
[VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available
Adding VOTE tag to subject
and a clarification (pardon the typo):
This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up this
month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
(00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as
0.98.1.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC0/ and Maven artifacts are
> also available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1007.
>
> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>
> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
>
>
> This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up this
> month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on February 31 on whether or not we should release this
> as 0.98.1.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available
Posted by lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>.
I'll look at 0.98.1RC0 this weekend. Promised!
-- Lars
________________________________
From: Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <de...@hbase.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available
Migration from 0.94 to 0.98 is in fact supported. We tested migration with
0.98.0 and it worked. I believe LarsH at Salesforce did the same. Maybe you
have some kind of environmental issue?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> Do we want to support 0.94 to 0.98.1 migration?
>
> Just tried -check, passed. But -execute failed:
> 2014-03-21 21:12:44,087 INFO [main] Configuration.deprecation:
> fs.default.name is deprecated. Instead, use fs.defaultFS
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.verifyNSUpgrade(NamespaceUpgrade.java:547)
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.upgradeTableDirs(NamespaceUpgrade.java:133)
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.run(NamespaceUpgrade.java:561)
> at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70)
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeTool(UpgradeTo96.java:221)
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeUpgrade(UpgradeTo96.java:211)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.run(UpgradeTo96.java:133)
> at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.main(UpgradeTo96.java:257)
>
> Should -check have failed the same way?
>
> JM
>
>
> 2014-03-18 15:44 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > - checked documentation and tarball
> >
> > - Ran unit test suite which passed
> >
> > - Ran in local and distributed mode
> > - checked the UI pages
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Adding VOTE tag to subject
> > >
> > > and a clarification (pardon the typo):
> > >
> > > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up
> this
> > > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> > Time
> > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this
> as
> > > 0.98.1.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available for
> download
> > at
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC0/ and Maven artifacts
> are
> > > > also available in the temporary repository
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1007
> > .
> > > >
> > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > > >
> > > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up
> > this
> > > > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight
> Pacific
> > > Time
> > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on February 31 on whether or not we should release
> > this
> > > > as 0.98.1.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Cool, thanks for checking!
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> Ok. Was because I copied my /backup folder in /hbase/backup instead of
> /hbase.
>
> We should have given a nicer error message, or we should have also checked
> that in -check...
>
> After moving the folder correctly, was able to upgrade. So I will continue
> some few testing steps.
>
> JM
>
> 2014-03-21 21:16 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>:
>
> > Migration from 0.94 to 0.98 is in fact supported. We tested migration
> with
> > 0.98.0 and it worked. I believe LarsH at Salesforce did the same. Maybe
> you
> > have some kind of environmental issue?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Do we want to support 0.94 to 0.98.1 migration?
> > >
> > > Just tried -check, passed. But -execute failed:
> > > 2014-03-21 21:12:44,087 INFO [main] Configuration.deprecation:
> > > fs.default.name is deprecated. Instead, use fs.defaultFS
> > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.verifyNSUpgrade(NamespaceUpgrade.java:547)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.upgradeTableDirs(NamespaceUpgrade.java:133)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.run(NamespaceUpgrade.java:561)
> > > at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeTool(UpgradeTo96.java:221)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeUpgrade(UpgradeTo96.java:211)
> > > at
> > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.run(UpgradeTo96.java:133)
> > > at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70)
> > > at
> > >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.main(UpgradeTo96.java:257)
> > >
> > > Should -check have failed the same way?
> > >
> > > JM
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-03-18 15:44 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > - checked documentation and tarball
> > > >
> > > > - Ran unit test suite which passed
> > > >
> > > > - Ran in local and distributed mode
> > > > - checked the UI pages
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Adding VOTE tag to subject
> > > > >
> > > > > and a clarification (pardon the typo):
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up
> > > this
> > > > > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight
> > Pacific
> > > > Time
> > > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release
> > this
> > > as
> > > > > 0.98.1.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurtell@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available for
> > > download
> > > > at
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC0/ and Maven
> artifacts
> > > are
> > > > > > also available in the temporary repository
> > > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1007
> > > > .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked
> up
> > > > this
> > > > > > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight
> > > Pacific
> > > > > Time
> > > > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on February 31 on whether or not we should
> > release
> > > > this
> > > > > > as 0.98.1.
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available
Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
Ok. Was because I copied my /backup folder in /hbase/backup instead of
/hbase.
We should have given a nicer error message, or we should have also checked
that in -check...
After moving the folder correctly, was able to upgrade. So I will continue
some few testing steps.
JM
2014-03-21 21:16 GMT-04:00 Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>:
> Migration from 0.94 to 0.98 is in fact supported. We tested migration with
> 0.98.0 and it worked. I believe LarsH at Salesforce did the same. Maybe you
> have some kind of environmental issue?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>
> > Do we want to support 0.94 to 0.98.1 migration?
> >
> > Just tried -check, passed. But -execute failed:
> > 2014-03-21 21:12:44,087 INFO [main] Configuration.deprecation:
> > fs.default.name is deprecated. Instead, use fs.defaultFS
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
> > at
> >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.verifyNSUpgrade(NamespaceUpgrade.java:547)
> > at
> >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.upgradeTableDirs(NamespaceUpgrade.java:133)
> > at
> >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.run(NamespaceUpgrade.java:561)
> > at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70)
> > at
> >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeTool(UpgradeTo96.java:221)
> > at
> >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeUpgrade(UpgradeTo96.java:211)
> > at
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.run(UpgradeTo96.java:133)
> > at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70)
> > at
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.main(UpgradeTo96.java:257)
> >
> > Should -check have failed the same way?
> >
> > JM
> >
> >
> > 2014-03-18 15:44 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > - checked documentation and tarball
> > >
> > > - Ran unit test suite which passed
> > >
> > > - Ran in local and distributed mode
> > > - checked the UI pages
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Adding VOTE tag to subject
> > > >
> > > > and a clarification (pardon the typo):
> > > >
> > > > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up
> > this
> > > > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight
> Pacific
> > > Time
> > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release
> this
> > as
> > > > 0.98.1.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available for
> > download
> > > at
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC0/ and Maven artifacts
> > are
> > > > > also available in the temporary repository
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1007
> > > .
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > > > >
> > > > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up
> > > this
> > > > > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight
> > Pacific
> > > > Time
> > > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on February 31 on whether or not we should
> release
> > > this
> > > > > as 0.98.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > - Andy
> > > > >
> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > Hein
> > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
Migration from 0.94 to 0.98 is in fact supported. We tested migration with
0.98.0 and it worked. I believe LarsH at Salesforce did the same. Maybe you
have some kind of environmental issue?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> Do we want to support 0.94 to 0.98.1 migration?
>
> Just tried -check, passed. But -execute failed:
> 2014-03-21 21:12:44,087 INFO [main] Configuration.deprecation:
> fs.default.name is deprecated. Instead, use fs.defaultFS
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.verifyNSUpgrade(NamespaceUpgrade.java:547)
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.upgradeTableDirs(NamespaceUpgrade.java:133)
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.run(NamespaceUpgrade.java:561)
> at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70)
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeTool(UpgradeTo96.java:221)
> at
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeUpgrade(UpgradeTo96.java:211)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.run(UpgradeTo96.java:133)
> at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70)
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.main(UpgradeTo96.java:257)
>
> Should -check have failed the same way?
>
> JM
>
>
> 2014-03-18 15:44 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > - checked documentation and tarball
> >
> > - Ran unit test suite which passed
> >
> > - Ran in local and distributed mode
> > - checked the UI pages
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Adding VOTE tag to subject
> > >
> > > and a clarification (pardon the typo):
> > >
> > > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up
> this
> > > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> > Time
> > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this
> as
> > > 0.98.1.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available for
> download
> > at
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC0/ and Maven artifacts
> are
> > > > also available in the temporary repository
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1007
> > .
> > > >
> > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > > >
> > > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up
> > this
> > > > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight
> Pacific
> > > Time
> > > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on February 31 on whether or not we should release
> > this
> > > > as 0.98.1.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available
Posted by Jean-Marc Spaggiari <je...@spaggiari.org>.
Do we want to support 0.94 to 0.98.1 migration?
Just tried -check, passed. But -execute failed:
2014-03-21 21:12:44,087 INFO [main] Configuration.deprecation:
fs.default.name is deprecated. Instead, use fs.defaultFS
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.verifyNSUpgrade(NamespaceUpgrade.java:547)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.upgradeTableDirs(NamespaceUpgrade.java:133)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.NamespaceUpgrade.run(NamespaceUpgrade.java:561)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeTool(UpgradeTo96.java:221)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.executeUpgrade(UpgradeTo96.java:211)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.run(UpgradeTo96.java:133)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.migration.UpgradeTo96.main(UpgradeTo96.java:257)
Should -check have failed the same way?
JM
2014-03-18 15:44 GMT-04:00 Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> - checked documentation and tarball
>
> - Ran unit test suite which passed
>
> - Ran in local and distributed mode
> - checked the UI pages
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Adding VOTE tag to subject
> >
> > and a clarification (pardon the typo):
> >
> > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up this
> > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> Time
> > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as
> > 0.98.1.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available for download
> at
> > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC0/ and Maven artifacts are
> > > also available in the temporary repository
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1007
> .
> > >
> > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > >
> > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> > >
> > >
> > > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up
> this
> > > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> > Time
> > > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on February 31 on whether or not we should release
> this
> > > as 0.98.1.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
+1
- checked documentation and tarball
- Ran unit test suite which passed
- Ran in local and distributed mode
- checked the UI pages
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Adding VOTE tag to subject
>
> and a clarification (pardon the typo):
>
> This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up this
> month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as
> 0.98.1.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
> > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC0/ and Maven artifacts are
> > also available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1007.
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> >
> >
> > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up this
> > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> Time
> > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on February 31 on whether or not we should release this
> > as 0.98.1.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
+1
- checked documentation and tarball
- Ran unit test suite which passed
- Ran in local and distributed mode
- checked the UI pages
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> Adding VOTE tag to subject
>
> and a clarification (pardon the typo):
>
> This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up this
> month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as
> 0.98.1.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
> > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC0/ and Maven artifacts are
> > also available in the temporary repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1007.
> >
> > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >
> > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> >
> >
> > This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up this
> > month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> Time
> > (00:00 -0800 GMT) on February 31 on whether or not we should release this
> > as 0.98.1.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>