You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/04/06 17:53:34 UTC

[jira] Created: (CAMEL-1519) Spring DSL - Transacted routes with policy seems to not work - same route in Java DSL works

Spring DSL - Transacted routes with policy seems to not work - same route in Java DSL works 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: CAMEL-1519
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1519
             Project: Apache Camel
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 2.0-M1, 1.6.0
            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
            Priority: Critical
             Fix For: 2.0.0, Future, 1.6.1


In 1.x see rev 762400 where I added an unit test demonstrating the bug

The TX interceptor gets applied wrong with Spring DSL versus Java DSL.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (CAMEL-1519) Spring DSL - Transacted routes with policy seems to not work - same route in Java DSL works

Posted by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-1519:
-------------------------------

    Priority: Major  (was: Critical)

> Spring DSL - Transacted routes with policy seems to not work - same route in Java DSL works 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-1519
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1519
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: camel-spring
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0, 2.0-M1
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.6.1
>
>
> In 1.x see rev 762400 where I added an unit test demonstrating the bug
> The TX interceptor gets applied wrong with Spring DSL versus Java DSL.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-1519) Spring DSL - Transacted routes with policy seems to not work - same route in Java DSL works

Posted by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=51054#action_51054 ] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-1519:
------------------------------------

The issue are when you define the transacted policy in a single tag such as <policy ref="required"/>.
When you span the entire route in a <policy> ROUTE HERE </policy> then it worked before also.

> Spring DSL - Transacted routes with policy seems to not work - same route in Java DSL works 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-1519
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1519
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0, 2.0-M1
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.6.1
>
>
> In 1.x see rev 762400 where I added an unit test demonstrating the bug
> The TX interceptor gets applied wrong with Spring DSL versus Java DSL.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (CAMEL-1519) Spring DSL - Transacted routes with policy seems to not work - same route in Java DSL works

Posted by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-1519:
-------------------------------

    Component/s: camel-spring

> Spring DSL - Transacted routes with policy seems to not work - same route in Java DSL works 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-1519
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1519
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: camel-spring
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0, 2.0-M1
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.6.1
>
>
> In 1.x see rev 762400 where I added an unit test demonstrating the bug
> The TX interceptor gets applied wrong with Spring DSL versus Java DSL.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Resolved: (CAMEL-1519) Spring DSL - Transacted routes with policy seems to not work - same route in Java DSL works

Posted by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-1519.
--------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: Future)

trunk: 762421
1.x: 762419, 762420



> Spring DSL - Transacted routes with policy seems to not work - same route in Java DSL works 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-1519
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1519
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0, 2.0-M1
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.6.1
>
>
> In 1.x see rev 762400 where I added an unit test demonstrating the bug
> The TX interceptor gets applied wrong with Spring DSL versus Java DSL.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.