[GitHub] [iceberg] wypoon commented on pull request #3624: Build: Append _2.12 (scala version) to Spark 3.1 and 3.2 module names

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

wypoon commented on pull request #3624:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3624#issuecomment-984209322


   I know this is committed already, but what is the rationale behind `iceberg-spark-3.2-runtime_2.12-<version>.jar` rather than say, `iceberg-spark-3.2_2.12-runtime-<version>.jar`? (I just tried it out.) Just that it's sbt convention?
   Maybe we should have `iceberg-spark-runtime-3.2_2.12-<version>.jar` instead. That would still follow sbt convention.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org