You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@stanbol.apache.org by "Sawhney, Tarandeep Singh" <ts...@innodata.com> on 2013/07/22 08:40:59 UTC
Open NLP Vs. GATE
Hi All
Can you please provide some inputs to understand how does Open NLP compares
with GATE (Stanford Core NLP).
I have been trying to find some sought of comparison matrix/information to
find a good answer on this
Any inputs on this please will be very help ful
best regards
tarandeep
--
"This e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it are for the sole use
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential , proprietary or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any action taken in
reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful."
Re: Open NLP Vs. GATE
Posted by "Tarandeep Singh, Sawhney" <ts...@innodata.com>.
Thanks Rupert for your response
It helped. I will explore further on NLP support and will request for some
more information ahead
best regards
taran
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Rupert Westenthaler <
rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tarandeep,
>
> * Stanford Core NLP models are higher quality as the one available for
> OpenNLP
> * I had once trained Stanford NER and OpenNLP NER model based on the
> same trainings data and my impression was that results with Stanford
> NER where a little bit better
> * Memory consumption of Stanford NLP is - based on my experience -
> about 5 time higher as with OpenNLP.
> * Processing times are similar
>
> For english you can use both Stanford NLP and OpenNLP with Stanbol.
> OpenNLP is directly integrated for StanfordNLP you need to use [1].
> See also [2] for a full list of supported NLP frameworks and
> languages.
>
> hope this helps
> best
> Rupert
>
> [1] https://github.com/westei/stanbol-stanfordnlp
> [2]
> http://stanbol.staging.apache.org/docs/trunk/components/enhancer/nlp/#integrated-nlp-frameworks
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Tarandeep Singh, Sawhney
> <ts...@innodata.com> wrote:
> > A polite reminder. Can anyone share some inputs on this.
> >
> > best regards
> > tarandeep
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Sawhney, Tarandeep Singh <
> > tsawhney@innodata.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All
> >>
> >> Can you please provide some inputs to understand how does Open NLP
> >> compares with GATE (Stanford Core NLP).
> >>
> >> I have been trying to find some sought of comparison matrix/information
> to
> >> find a good answer on this
> >>
> >> Any inputs on this please will be very help ful
> >>
> >> best regards
> >> tarandeep
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> > "This e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it are for the sole use
> > of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential , proprietary
> or
> > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> > message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
> > forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any action taken in
> > reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful."
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen
>
--
"This e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it are for the sole use
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential , proprietary or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any action taken in
reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful."
Re: Open NLP Vs. GATE
Posted by Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi Tarandeep,
* Stanford Core NLP models are higher quality as the one available for OpenNLP
* I had once trained Stanford NER and OpenNLP NER model based on the
same trainings data and my impression was that results with Stanford
NER where a little bit better
* Memory consumption of Stanford NLP is - based on my experience -
about 5 time higher as with OpenNLP.
* Processing times are similar
For english you can use both Stanford NLP and OpenNLP with Stanbol.
OpenNLP is directly integrated for StanfordNLP you need to use [1].
See also [2] for a full list of supported NLP frameworks and
languages.
hope this helps
best
Rupert
[1] https://github.com/westei/stanbol-stanfordnlp
[2] http://stanbol.staging.apache.org/docs/trunk/components/enhancer/nlp/#integrated-nlp-frameworks
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Tarandeep Singh, Sawhney
<ts...@innodata.com> wrote:
> A polite reminder. Can anyone share some inputs on this.
>
> best regards
> tarandeep
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Sawhney, Tarandeep Singh <
> tsawhney@innodata.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> Can you please provide some inputs to understand how does Open NLP
>> compares with GATE (Stanford Core NLP).
>>
>> I have been trying to find some sought of comparison matrix/information to
>> find a good answer on this
>>
>> Any inputs on this please will be very help ful
>>
>> best regards
>> tarandeep
>>
>
> --
>
> "This e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it are for the sole use
> of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential , proprietary or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
> forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any action taken in
> reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful."
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
Re: Open NLP Vs. GATE
Posted by "Tarandeep Singh, Sawhney" <ts...@innodata.com>.
A polite reminder. Can anyone share some inputs on this.
best regards
tarandeep
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Sawhney, Tarandeep Singh <
tsawhney@innodata.com> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Can you please provide some inputs to understand how does Open NLP
> compares with GATE (Stanford Core NLP).
>
> I have been trying to find some sought of comparison matrix/information to
> find a good answer on this
>
> Any inputs on this please will be very help ful
>
> best regards
> tarandeep
>
--
"This e-mail and any attachments transmitted with it are for the sole use
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential , proprietary or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination,
forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any action taken in
reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful."