Problem? with 3.0.1

[Grant Baxter <gr...@baxterfamily.to>]

I don't know if this is a problem or not. I don't remember seeing it
on 3.0.0. When running spamassassin or spamd in debug mode, I see the
following:

plugin:mail::spamassassin::plugin::uridnsbl=hash(0x1d82310) inhibited
further callbacks

This happens about a dozen times, then SA goes on.

Any thoughts?

grant

Re: Problem? with 3.0.1

[Theo Van Dinter <fe...@kluge.net>]

On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 04:03:02PM +0100, Ronan wrote:
> i also saw it in a couple of other peoples' posts recently. It appears 
> like you say when i run
> spamassassin --lint -D
> 
> anyone??
> >plugin:mail::spamassassin::plugin::uridnsbl=hash(0x1d82310) inhibited
> >further callbacks

it's 100% normal.  it's the plugin reading in a configuration option, then
inhibiting the configuration line being passed to any other plugins (since
it's handled it).

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.
 (Bruce Ediger, bediger@teal.csn.org, in comp.os.linux.misc, on X interfaces.)

Re: Problem? with 3.0.1

[Ronan <r....@qub.ac.uk>]

i get this all the time in my current 3.0.0 version.
i also saw it in a couple of other peoples' posts recently. It appears 
like you say when i run
spamassassin --lint -D

anyone??

Grant Baxter wrote:

> I don't know if this is a problem or not. I don't remember seeing it
> on 3.0.0. When running spamassassin or spamd in debug mode, I see the
> following:
> 
> plugin:mail::spamassassin::plugin::uridnsbl=hash(0x1d82310) inhibited
> further callbacks
> 
> This happens about a dozen times, then SA goes on.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> grant
> 
> dtri

-- 
Regards

Ronan McGlue
==============
Analyst/Programmer
Information Services
Queens University Belfast
BT7 1NN