You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Davanum Srinivas <di...@yahoo.com> on 2001/07/10 17:06:50 UTC
[C2.0][VOTE] Sync SQL Transformer.java with latest from 2.1
Hi Team,
+1. My Vote is to go with the latest SQL Transformer in 2.1. See below for a description potential
problem with SQLTransformer in C2.1.
Thanks,
dims
--- Beauprez Sven <Sv...@the-ecorp.com> wrote:
> There is one outstanding issue: the SQLTransformer needs a JDBC driver that
> implements at least callable statements. I don't think every DB has a driver
> with this functionality, but the question now is: Is this a drawback? I mean
> all commercial and all major open source DB's have a driver with this
> functionallity and I think the added value of the new implementation is big
> enough to consider to add the SQLTransformer to 2.0.
> I know one user who had problem with PostgreSQL, but I found a driver
> (didn't test it), which should implement the necessary functionality:
> http://jdbc.postgresql.org/
=====
Davanum Srinivas, JNI-FAQ Manager
http://www.jGuru.com/faq/JNI
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
RE: [C2.0][VOTE] Sync SQL Transformer.java with latest from 2.1
Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <vg...@hns.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dims@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:07
> To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: [C2.0][VOTE] Sync SQL Transformer.java with latest from 2.1
>
>
> Hi Team,
>
> +1. My Vote is to go with the latest SQL Transformer in 2.1. See below for a description potential
> problem with SQLTransformer in C2.1.
+1
Vadim
>
> Thanks,
> dims
>
> --- Beauprez Sven <Sv...@the-ecorp.com> wrote:
> > There is one outstanding issue: the SQLTransformer needs a JDBC driver that
> > implements at least callable statements. I don't think every DB has a driver
> > with this functionality, but the question now is: Is this a drawback? I mean
> > all commercial and all major open source DB's have a driver with this
> > functionallity and I think the added value of the new implementation is big
> > enough to consider to add the SQLTransformer to 2.0.
> > I know one user who had problem with PostgreSQL, but I found a driver
> > (didn't test it), which should implement the necessary functionality:
> > http://jdbc.postgresql.org/
>
>
> =====
> Davanum Srinivas, JNI-FAQ Manager
> http://www.jGuru.com/faq/JNI
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org