You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> on 2007/08/20 16:15:27 UTC
Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
All,
Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose
that we remove the older versions from the download site. If there
are no objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1
release.
Re: Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
+1
vamsi
On 8/20/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose
> that we remove the older versions from the download site. If there
> are no objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1
> release.
>
Re: Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
Posted by "Jay D. McHugh" <ja...@joyfulnoisewebdesign.com>.
+1 to removing 1.0 and 1.1
Also... If I remember correctly, the only issue that prevented 1.2 from
releasing was the ConcurrentModificationException that came up under
stress testing of DayTrader.
Is that really enough to block the release? Especially since (as far as
I know) there hasn't been
any work on fixing it (because the problem did not carry over into 2.0).
Jay
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> All,
>
> Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose that
> we remove the older versions from the download site. If there are no
> objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1 release.
>
>
>
Re: Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Aug 20, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> All,
>
> Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose
> that we remove the older versions from the download site. If there
> are no objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1
> release.
Agreed.
--kevan
Re: Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> All,
>
> Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose that
> we remove the older versions from the download site. If there are no
> objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1 release.
>
Re: Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
On Aug 22, 2007, at 7:19 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
>
> Does http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ deserve a better mention,
> may be directly under "Available releases" section?
no, this is a last resort for downloads. We rely on the mirror
system to spread the load. If we specifically pointed to that URL
we'd likely stress the Apache infrastructure.
>
Re: Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
Posted by Shiva Kumar H R <sh...@gmail.com>.
I had never noticed http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ and
http://archive.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ !
The download links from "Available releases" section of
http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html were directly taking me to some
mirror site. It was only today that I noticed that
http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html does have a link (with name main
distribution directory) to that page but under "Verifying the integrity of
the files" section.
Does http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/ deserve a better mention, may be
directly under "Available releases" section?
Equal surprises by looking at http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/ &
http://archive.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/ for the first time! I will
be happy to see some highlighted links from
http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html to those pages.
Thanks,
Shiva
On 8/22/07, Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> right, actually the Archive section on the web site should be just a link
> this server. I don't think we mention anywhere else about this server.
>
> As for removing those pages, for now I would suggest to change the parent
> page to "no show" instead of removing them permanently.
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> > The distributions are all automatically archived at
> > http://archive.apache.org/dist/geronimo/
> >
> >
> > On Aug 21, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
> >
> >> how about an archive section instead of permanently removing?
> >> We would have 2.0.1 and 1.1.1 as the latest stable and official
> >> releases, we should add the release date too. Then an Archive section
> >> for 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2. Thoughts?
> >> Cheers!
> >> Hernan
> >>
> >> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >>> All,
> >>> Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose
> >>> that we remove the older versions from the download site. If there
> >>> are no objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1
> >>> release.
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
right, actually the Archive section on the web site should be just a link this server. I don't think we mention anywhere else about this server.
As for removing those pages, for now I would suggest to change the parent page to "no show" instead of removing them permanently.
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> The distributions are all automatically archived at
> http://archive.apache.org/dist/geronimo/
>
>
> On Aug 21, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
>
>> how about an archive section instead of permanently removing?
>> We would have 2.0.1 and 1.1.1 as the latest stable and official
>> releases, we should add the release date too. Then an Archive section
>> for 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2. Thoughts?
>> Cheers!
>> Hernan
>>
>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>> All,
>>> Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose
>>> that we remove the older versions from the download site. If there
>>> are no objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1
>>> release.
>>
>
>
Re: Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
The distributions are all automatically archived at http://
archive.apache.org/dist/geronimo/
On Aug 21, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
> how about an archive section instead of permanently removing?
> We would have 2.0.1 and 1.1.1 as the latest stable and official
> releases, we should add the release date too. Then an Archive
> section for 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2. Thoughts?
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> All,
>> Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose
>> that we remove the older versions from the download site. If
>> there are no objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the
>> 2.0.1 release.
>
Re: Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
how about an archive section instead of permanently removing?
We would have 2.0.1 and 1.1.1 as the latest stable and official releases, we should add the release date too. Then an Archive section for 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2. Thoughts?
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> All,
>
> Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose that
> we remove the older versions from the download site. If there are no
> objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1 release.
>
Re: Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> All,
>
> Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose that
> we remove the older versions from the download site. If there are no
> objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1 release.
Re: Removing 1.0 and 1.1 from the download site...any objections?
Posted by Prasad Kashyap <go...@gmail.com>.
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 8/20/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose
> that we remove the older versions from the download site. If there
> are no objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1
> release.
>