You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2008/06/23 04:48:17 UTC
[Bug 5928] New: MISSING_HEADERS should be MISSING_RECIPIENTS?
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5928
Summary: MISSING_HEADERS should be MISSING_RECIPIENTS?
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.2.4
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
ReportedBy: jhaar@trimble.co.nz
Hi there
A bit pedantic, but I did find myself wandering around the SA source code
trying to figure out where the "Missing To: header" description came from.
Anyway, to me MISSING_HEADERS implies some form of meta rule - when in fact it
only covers missing recipient headers. Shouldn't it be replaced with
MISSING_RECIPIENTS, and then perhaps MISSING_HEADERS could become a meta rule
covering the likes of
MISSING_RECIPIENTS,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_SUBJECT, etc? Also, it's more
consistent with such rules too.
Jason
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 5928] MISSING_HEADERS should be MISSING_RECIPIENTS?
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5928
Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #1 from Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> 2008-07-11 01:59:29 PST ---
sorry, I'm not keen on changing this. unfortunately, changing rule names
is a big deal -- lots of people change scores for these rules, and changing
what they've modified from underneath them is a much worse thing than
a little confusion for a smaller population of experienced users
such as yourself. ;)
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.