Wait for streamer to "finish" ?

[Mikael <mi...@telia.com>]

Hi!

If I use flush() an a streamer it looks like it is waiting for all tags 
to be written, but if I call .size() on a cache after flush is complete 
it is still zero (primary and backup), it takes some time for it to show 
up even on a single node, is there a way to wait for the streamer to 
finish so that the entries are actually in the cache before I continue ?

I just realized I have not checked if the entries are actually there, is 
it possible that the entries are there and it's just not the size that 
is reported correct yet ?

Mikael

Re: Wait for streamer to "finish" ?

[Ilya Kasnacheev <il...@gmail.com>]

Hello!

After flush() or close() are finished, all records should be in cache in
both size() and contains() sense.

Regards,
-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev


вт, 12 нояб. 2019 г. в 12:37, Mikael <mi...@telia.com>:

> Hi!
>
> If I use flush() an a streamer it looks like it is waiting for all tags
> to be written, but if I call .size() on a cache after flush is complete
> it is still zero (primary and backup), it takes some time for it to show
> up even on a single node, is there a way to wait for the streamer to
> finish so that the entries are actually in the cache before I continue ?
>
> I just realized I have not checked if the entries are actually there, is
> it possible that the entries are there and it's just not the size that
> is reported correct yet ?
>
> Mikael
>
>
>
>