You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@nuttx.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/04/11 00:54:19 UTC

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] antmerlino opened a new pull request #3513: Separate CLOCK_TIMEKEEPING and SCHED_TICKLESS.

antmerlino opened a new pull request #3513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/3513


   ## Summary
   There is a lot of coupling that seems both wrong and unnecessary between CONFIG_CLOCK_TIMEKEEPING and CONFIG_SCHED_TICKLESS. 
   
   Please correct me if there is a valid reason for this couple, but I don't see it. 
   
   There is still some coupling here that I don't like. In particular, I don't understand why we need up_timer_getcounter() and up_timer_getmask() - couldn't the timekeeping driver just use the typical up_timer_gettime() and keep the interface simpler?
   
   This at least starts the decoupling and fixes build issues.
   
   ## Impact
   
   ## Testing
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #3513: Seperate CLOCK_TIMEKEEPING and SCHED_TICKLESS.

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.

xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #3513:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/3513


   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org