You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to netcat@netbeans.apache.org by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID> on 2018/11/07 11:08:58 UTC
Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Hi all,
Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected
over here:
https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because
they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th COB.
That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent Apache
NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
(remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the focus
of an Apache release):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that have
been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with
evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to ourselves,
e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then
tackle solving them.
Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to reproduce
your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official
PPMC vote thread for the release.
Thanks,
Gj
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Rodrigo Teixeira Andreotti <ro...@gmail.com>.
Hello, guys!
I downloaded Netbeans VC3 today, I've been using it since VC1 for my
day-to-day work and it has worked perfectly.
But in VC3 I came across a detail that was not happening in VC2.
Search and replace is with a bug, which I already reported on Jira as well (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NETBEANS/issues/NETBEANS-1624).
When I try to replace something, netbeans replaces "nothing" ... lol
I am attaching a message of behavior
[image: After Replace.jpg]
______________________________________________________________________
[image: http://www.eximiaweb.com.br/_images/Assinatura.png]
Em qua, 7 de nov de 2018 às 15:13, Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> escreveu:
> Hi Emilian,
>
> In response to your question, from my point of view, if we release on any
> date in November, that would be awesome, regardless if it's exactly the
> middle of the month (seems unlikely) or a week or so later.
> Gj
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't suppose the Nov 15th date shown on
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
> > includes the 3 days we have to keep the incubator vote, right?
> >
> > So we are looking for Nov 19th for the actual release date, right?
> >
> > --emi
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:09 PM Geertjan Wielenga
> > <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info
> collected
> > > over here:
> > >
> > > https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
> > >
> > > I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because
> > > they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
> > >
> > > We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th
> COB.
> > >
> > > That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> > Apache
> > > NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> > > (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at
> most
> > > the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the
> focus
> > > of an Apache release):
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
> > >
> > > We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that
> have
> > > been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with
> > > evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to
> ourselves,
> > > e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then
> > > tackle solving them.
> > >
> > > Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to
> > reproduce
> > > your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official
> > > PPMC vote thread for the release.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Gj
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
> >
> > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >
> >
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Rodrigo Teixeira Andreotti <ro...@gmail.com>.
Hello, guys!
I downloaded Netbeans VC3 today, I've been using it since VC1 for my
day-to-day work and it has worked perfectly.
But in VC3 I came across a detail that was not happening in VC2.
Search and replace is with a bug, which I already reported on Jira as well (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NETBEANS/issues/NETBEANS-1624).
When I try to replace something, netbeans replaces "nothing" ... lol
I am attaching a message of behavior
[image: After Replace.jpg]
______________________________________________________________________
[image: http://www.eximiaweb.com.br/_images/Assinatura.png]
Em qua, 7 de nov de 2018 às 15:13, Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> escreveu:
> Hi Emilian,
>
> In response to your question, from my point of view, if we release on any
> date in November, that would be awesome, regardless if it's exactly the
> middle of the month (seems unlikely) or a week or so later.
> Gj
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't suppose the Nov 15th date shown on
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
> > includes the 3 days we have to keep the incubator vote, right?
> >
> > So we are looking for Nov 19th for the actual release date, right?
> >
> > --emi
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:09 PM Geertjan Wielenga
> > <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info
> collected
> > > over here:
> > >
> > > https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
> > >
> > > I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because
> > > they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
> > >
> > > We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th
> COB.
> > >
> > > That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> > Apache
> > > NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> > > (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at
> most
> > > the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the
> focus
> > > of an Apache release):
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
> > >
> > > We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that
> have
> > > been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with
> > > evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to
> ourselves,
> > > e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then
> > > tackle solving them.
> > >
> > > Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to
> > reproduce
> > > your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official
> > > PPMC vote thread for the release.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Gj
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
> >
> > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >
> >
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Hi Emilian,
In response to your question, from my point of view, if we release on any
date in November, that would be awesome, regardless if it's exactly the
middle of the month (seems unlikely) or a week or so later.
Gj
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't suppose the Nov 15th date shown on
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
> includes the 3 days we have to keep the incubator vote, right?
>
> So we are looking for Nov 19th for the actual release date, right?
>
> --emi
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:09 PM Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected
> > over here:
> >
> > https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
> >
> > I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because
> > they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
> >
> > We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th COB.
> >
> > That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> Apache
> > NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> > (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
> > the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the focus
> > of an Apache release):
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
> >
> > We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that have
> > been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with
> > evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to ourselves,
> > e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then
> > tackle solving them.
> >
> > Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to
> reproduce
> > your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official
> > PPMC vote thread for the release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gj
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Hi Emilian,
In response to your question, from my point of view, if we release on any
date in November, that would be awesome, regardless if it's exactly the
middle of the month (seems unlikely) or a week or so later.
Gj
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't suppose the Nov 15th date shown on
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
> includes the 3 days we have to keep the incubator vote, right?
>
> So we are looking for Nov 19th for the actual release date, right?
>
> --emi
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:09 PM Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected
> > over here:
> >
> > https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
> >
> > I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because
> > they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
> >
> > We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th COB.
> >
> > That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> Apache
> > NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> > (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
> > the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the focus
> > of an Apache release):
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
> >
> > We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that have
> > been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with
> > evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to ourselves,
> > e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then
> > tackle solving them.
> >
> > Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to
> reproduce
> > your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official
> > PPMC vote thread for the release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gj
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Hi Emilian,
In response to your question, from my point of view, if we release on any
date in November, that would be awesome, regardless if it's exactly the
middle of the month (seems unlikely) or a week or so later.
Gj
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't suppose the Nov 15th date shown on
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
> includes the 3 days we have to keep the incubator vote, right?
>
> So we are looking for Nov 19th for the actual release date, right?
>
> --emi
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:09 PM Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected
> > over here:
> >
> > https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
> >
> > I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because
> > they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
> >
> > We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th COB.
> >
> > That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> Apache
> > NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> > (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
> > the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the focus
> > of an Apache release):
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
> >
> > We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that have
> > been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with
> > evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to ourselves,
> > e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then
> > tackle solving them.
> >
> > Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to
> reproduce
> > your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official
> > PPMC vote thread for the release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gj
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>.
I don't suppose the Nov 15th date shown on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
includes the 3 days we have to keep the incubator vote, right?
So we are looking for Nov 19th for the actual release date, right?
--emi
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:09 PM Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected
> over here:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
>
> I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because
> they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
>
> We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th COB.
>
> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent Apache
> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the focus
> of an Apache release):
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
>
> We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that have
> been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with
> evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to ourselves,
> e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then
> tackle solving them.
>
> Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to reproduce
> your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official
> PPMC vote thread for the release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gj
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>.
I don't suppose the Nov 15th date shown on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
includes the 3 days we have to keep the incubator vote, right?
So we are looking for Nov 19th for the actual release date, right?
--emi
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:09 PM Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected
> over here:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
>
> I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because
> they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
>
> We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th COB.
>
> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent Apache
> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the focus
> of an Apache release):
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
>
> We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that have
> been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with
> evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to ourselves,
> e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then
> tackle solving them.
>
> Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to reproduce
> your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official
> PPMC vote thread for the release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gj
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by sl...@slimdude.com.
Is there any documentation on how to build binaries? For Mac OSX?
Cheers,
Slim
On 2018-11-07 06:08, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected over here:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
>
> I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
>
> We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th COB.
>
> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent Apache NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the focus of an Apache release):
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
>
> We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that have been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to ourselves, e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then tackle solving them.
>
> Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to reproduce your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official PPMC vote thread for the release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gj
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>.
I don't suppose the Nov 15th date shown on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
includes the 3 days we have to keep the incubator vote, right?
So we are looking for Nov 19th for the actual release date, right?
--emi
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:09 PM Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected
> over here:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
>
> I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because
> they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
>
> We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th COB.
>
> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent Apache
> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the focus
> of an Apache release):
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
>
> We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that have
> been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with
> evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to ourselves,
> e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then
> tackle solving them.
>
> Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to reproduce
> your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official
> PPMC vote thread for the release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gj
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by sl...@slimdude.com.
Is there any documentation on how to build binaries? For Mac OSX?
Cheers,
Slim
On 2018-11-07 06:08, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected over here:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
>
> I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
>
> We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th COB.
>
> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent Apache NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the focus of an Apache release):
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
>
> We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that have been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to ourselves, e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then tackle solving them.
>
> Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to reproduce your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official PPMC vote thread for the release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gj
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by sl...@slimdude.com.
Is there any documentation on how to build binaries? For Mac OSX?
Cheers,
Slim
On 2018-11-07 06:08, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Laszlo has put together the 3rd voting candidate, with all info collected over here:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/is-apache-netbeans-10-ready
>
> I've seen several people closing issues over the past few days because they're found that they;ve been solved in 10-vc2 or 10-vc3.
>
> We're getting to the end of the survey deadline, i.e., November 11th COB.
>
> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent Apache NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries, but that's not the focus of an Apache release):
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+10.0+Schedule
>
> We do need to, of course, work on the many non-blocking issues that have been uncovered, and need to put together a plan for that, starting with evaluating them (maybe we can assign a set number per week to ourselves, e.g., evaluate 10 per week per person, something like that), and then tackle solving them.
>
> Anyway, this is where we are -- please get hold of 10-vc3, try to reproduce your issues, fill in the survey, next week we should begin the official PPMC vote thread for the release.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gj
AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>.
Afaik, there is still one blocker left with a PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/1012
Cheers
Chris
Von: Geertjan Wielenga
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36
An: dev
Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the sources,
since we're still running the survey on the binary.
But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be
replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin up
another voting candidate (which doesn't seem likely to me, right now, i.e.,
I think we have everything we want in vc3), is the one to use.
Gj
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:03 PM Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> Apache
> > NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
>
> I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?!
>
> > (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
> > the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries
>
> Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc
> archive alongside the binaries by actual release day.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>
AW: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>.
Hey Jan,
TLDR;
you are absolutely Right. I tried it in NB 8.2 but I use the notification Plugin where the notifications went to the Notify API from the OS, so I didn’t realized it, but yes it happens there too. Yes, it only appears in the notification area BUT, if you have opened that window/Dialog once to see what happens, after Closing it, it will appears as a separate Dialog again, when the error occurs.
So yes I will switch it to critical and wait for a fix. It appears for me, while I tried to Change Code inside of a NetBeans module and I realized it in NB 10 first because my use case was to double click at the end and select the Code. I set it to blocker, not only due to annoying, but IMHO such a exception window, should never come up while working in a normal case. Now I notice that it is inside the notification first. Thx for that.
The NPE is a bit more worse, because find usages is a common workflow and it doesn’t work that correct than before.
Cheers
Chris
Von: Jan Lahoda
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 23:57
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Hi,
My personal opinion only:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:14 PM Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>
wrote:
> Yeah well, well again. I said only in my opinion, so I’m open to discuss
> it. The one with the tripple click, could be a Corner case, but it never
> happened before and I had the Situation, where the execption window came up
> which is annoying.
>
I am mildly surprised there was an exception window in the release build -
the popup should be suppressed in release builds? I just tried VC3, and it
seems the exception is thrown, but there's no popup, it "just" adds the
warning sign on right bottom corner? (Ability to select does not seem to be
affected?)
Frankly, for marking something a blocker, we should not only judge if (and
how much) a thing is annoying and if it is reproducible, but also how
important/common is the usecase/what is the impact. In this case, it is a
double (mouse) click in the editor, keep the mouse button pressed after the
second click and move the mouse cursor beyond the end of the document. So,
my personal opinion is that this is annoying, reproducible and should be
fixed, but I don't see it to be severe enough to stop the release at the
current stage.
Also - the same thing happens for NB 8.2 for me, so I guess I wonder if
there's some new information on why we could live with this so far, but the
fix can't wait for the next release.
In any case, the bug was missing a reproducible testcase(!!), so I just
added one.
Jan
> The NPE was in my opinion a blocker, to make it clear what there happens
> and it was still annyoing that an NPE came up, with the exception window,
> after using find usages. So this should not happen at all.
>
> 586 is the one with the NPE and 1012 is wrong, smth with javadoc, I think
> you mean 1440, Right?
>
> My 2 cents.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Laszlo Kishalmi
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 17:48
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
>
> Well, well,
>
> As of NETBEANS-586 it was created in April and suddenly after vc3 it
> became a BLOCKER...
> As of NETBEANS-1012 It was "just" CRITICAL two days ago. For me the issue
> describes a not that common use case. (Well of course it is really
> subjective.)
>
> I'm not really happy about that, in the last two week of the release cycle
> some dormant bugs just gets elevated as BLOCKER-s.
> If we really need to cut a vc4 on this weekend I'm happy to merge the PR
> for NETBEANS-1012. However I do not think we need that.
>
> Laszlo Kishalmi
> Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0
>
>
> On 11/7/18 7:45 AM, Christian Lenz wrote:
> > And this is the other blocker, which has not yet a PR:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-586
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > Von: Geertjan Wielenga
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36
> > An: dev
> > Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
> >
> > Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the sources,
> > since we're still running the survey on the binary.
> >
> > But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be
> > replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin up
> > another voting candidate (which doesn't seem likely to me, right now,
> i.e.,
> > I think we have everything we want in vc3), is the one to use.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:03 PM Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga
> >> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> >> Apache
> >>> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> >> I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?!
> >>
> >>> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at
> most
> >>> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries
> >> Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc
> >> archive alongside the binaries by actual release day.
> >>
> >> Best wishes,
> >>
> >> Neil
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>
>
Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Great. Looks like we're discussing our way to the Apache NetBeans 10
release.
The main question is, has anything, or will anything, be added to the
release100 branch -- if 'yes', we'll need a vc4, which will be the actual
voting candidate, if 'no', then vc3 is the voting candidate and we should
use the thread Laszlo set up to vote on the sources.
Gj
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 11:57 PM Jan Lahoda <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My personal opinion only:
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:14 PM Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah well, well again. I said only in my opinion, so I’m open to discuss
> > it. The one with the tripple click, could be a Corner case, but it never
> > happened before and I had the Situation, where the execption window came
> up
> > which is annoying.
> >
>
> I am mildly surprised there was an exception window in the release build -
> the popup should be suppressed in release builds? I just tried VC3, and it
> seems the exception is thrown, but there's no popup, it "just" adds the
> warning sign on right bottom corner? (Ability to select does not seem to be
> affected?)
>
> Frankly, for marking something a blocker, we should not only judge if (and
> how much) a thing is annoying and if it is reproducible, but also how
> important/common is the usecase/what is the impact. In this case, it is a
> double (mouse) click in the editor, keep the mouse button pressed after the
> second click and move the mouse cursor beyond the end of the document. So,
> my personal opinion is that this is annoying, reproducible and should be
> fixed, but I don't see it to be severe enough to stop the release at the
> current stage.
>
> Also - the same thing happens for NB 8.2 for me, so I guess I wonder if
> there's some new information on why we could live with this so far, but the
> fix can't wait for the next release.
>
> In any case, the bug was missing a reproducible testcase(!!), so I just
> added one.
>
> Jan
>
>
> > The NPE was in my opinion a blocker, to make it clear what there happens
> > and it was still annyoing that an NPE came up, with the exception window,
> > after using find usages. So this should not happen at all.
> >
> > 586 is the one with the NPE and 1012 is wrong, smth with javadoc, I think
> > you mean 1440, Right?
> >
> > My 2 cents.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > Von: Laszlo Kishalmi
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 17:48
> > An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
> >
> > Well, well,
> >
> > As of NETBEANS-586 it was created in April and suddenly after vc3 it
> > became a BLOCKER...
> > As of NETBEANS-1012 It was "just" CRITICAL two days ago. For me the issue
> > describes a not that common use case. (Well of course it is really
> > subjective.)
> >
> > I'm not really happy about that, in the last two week of the release
> cycle
> > some dormant bugs just gets elevated as BLOCKER-s.
> > If we really need to cut a vc4 on this weekend I'm happy to merge the PR
> > for NETBEANS-1012. However I do not think we need that.
> >
> > Laszlo Kishalmi
> > Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0
> >
> >
> > On 11/7/18 7:45 AM, Christian Lenz wrote:
> > > And this is the other blocker, which has not yet a PR:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-586
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Von: Geertjan Wielenga
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36
> > > An: dev
> > > Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
> > >
> > > Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the
> sources,
> > > since we're still running the survey on the binary.
> > >
> > > But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be
> > > replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin
> up
> > > another voting candidate (which doesn't seem likely to me, right now,
> > i.e.,
> > > I think we have everything we want in vc3), is the one to use.
> > >
> > > Gj
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:03 PM Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga
> > >> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >>> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> > >> Apache
> > >>> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> > >> I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?!
> > >>
> > >>> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at
> > most
> > >>> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries
> > >> Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc
> > >> archive alongside the binaries by actual release day.
> > >>
> > >> Best wishes,
> > >>
> > >> Neil
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > >>
> > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >
> > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Attila Kelemen <at...@gmail.com>.
As far as I remember this was always the case for SEVERE logs with
exceptions and pop-up only happened for WARNING (a little odd, but I
thought that was intended).
Attila
Jan Lahoda <la...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. nov. 7., Sze, 23:57):
> Hi,
>
> My personal opinion only:
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:14 PM Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah well, well again. I said only in my opinion, so I’m open to discuss
> > it. The one with the tripple click, could be a Corner case, but it never
> > happened before and I had the Situation, where the execption window came
> up
> > which is annoying.
> >
>
> I am mildly surprised there was an exception window in the release build -
> the popup should be suppressed in release builds? I just tried VC3, and it
> seems the exception is thrown, but there's no popup, it "just" adds the
> warning sign on right bottom corner? (Ability to select does not seem to be
> affected?)
>
> Frankly, for marking something a blocker, we should not only judge if (and
> how much) a thing is annoying and if it is reproducible, but also how
> important/common is the usecase/what is the impact. In this case, it is a
> double (mouse) click in the editor, keep the mouse button pressed after the
> second click and move the mouse cursor beyond the end of the document. So,
> my personal opinion is that this is annoying, reproducible and should be
> fixed, but I don't see it to be severe enough to stop the release at the
> current stage.
>
> Also - the same thing happens for NB 8.2 for me, so I guess I wonder if
> there's some new information on why we could live with this so far, but the
> fix can't wait for the next release.
>
> In any case, the bug was missing a reproducible testcase(!!), so I just
> added one.
>
> Jan
>
>
> > The NPE was in my opinion a blocker, to make it clear what there happens
> > and it was still annyoing that an NPE came up, with the exception window,
> > after using find usages. So this should not happen at all.
> >
> > 586 is the one with the NPE and 1012 is wrong, smth with javadoc, I think
> > you mean 1440, Right?
> >
> > My 2 cents.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > Von: Laszlo Kishalmi
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 17:48
> > An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
> >
> > Well, well,
> >
> > As of NETBEANS-586 it was created in April and suddenly after vc3 it
> > became a BLOCKER...
> > As of NETBEANS-1012 It was "just" CRITICAL two days ago. For me the issue
> > describes a not that common use case. (Well of course it is really
> > subjective.)
> >
> > I'm not really happy about that, in the last two week of the release
> cycle
> > some dormant bugs just gets elevated as BLOCKER-s.
> > If we really need to cut a vc4 on this weekend I'm happy to merge the PR
> > for NETBEANS-1012. However I do not think we need that.
> >
> > Laszlo Kishalmi
> > Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0
> >
> >
> > On 11/7/18 7:45 AM, Christian Lenz wrote:
> > > And this is the other blocker, which has not yet a PR:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-586
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Von: Geertjan Wielenga
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36
> > > An: dev
> > > Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
> > >
> > > Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the
> sources,
> > > since we're still running the survey on the binary.
> > >
> > > But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be
> > > replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin
> up
> > > another voting candidate (which doesn't seem likely to me, right now,
> > i.e.,
> > > I think we have everything we want in vc3), is the one to use.
> > >
> > > Gj
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:03 PM Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga
> > >> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >>> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> > >> Apache
> > >>> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> > >> I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?!
> > >>
> > >>> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at
> > most
> > >>> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries
> > >> Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc
> > >> archive alongside the binaries by actual release day.
> > >>
> > >> Best wishes,
> > >>
> > >> Neil
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > >>
> > >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >
> > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Jan Lahoda <la...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
My personal opinion only:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 8:14 PM Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>
wrote:
> Yeah well, well again. I said only in my opinion, so I’m open to discuss
> it. The one with the tripple click, could be a Corner case, but it never
> happened before and I had the Situation, where the execption window came up
> which is annoying.
>
I am mildly surprised there was an exception window in the release build -
the popup should be suppressed in release builds? I just tried VC3, and it
seems the exception is thrown, but there's no popup, it "just" adds the
warning sign on right bottom corner? (Ability to select does not seem to be
affected?)
Frankly, for marking something a blocker, we should not only judge if (and
how much) a thing is annoying and if it is reproducible, but also how
important/common is the usecase/what is the impact. In this case, it is a
double (mouse) click in the editor, keep the mouse button pressed after the
second click and move the mouse cursor beyond the end of the document. So,
my personal opinion is that this is annoying, reproducible and should be
fixed, but I don't see it to be severe enough to stop the release at the
current stage.
Also - the same thing happens for NB 8.2 for me, so I guess I wonder if
there's some new information on why we could live with this so far, but the
fix can't wait for the next release.
In any case, the bug was missing a reproducible testcase(!!), so I just
added one.
Jan
> The NPE was in my opinion a blocker, to make it clear what there happens
> and it was still annyoing that an NPE came up, with the exception window,
> after using find usages. So this should not happen at all.
>
> 586 is the one with the NPE and 1012 is wrong, smth with javadoc, I think
> you mean 1440, Right?
>
> My 2 cents.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Laszlo Kishalmi
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 17:48
> An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
>
> Well, well,
>
> As of NETBEANS-586 it was created in April and suddenly after vc3 it
> became a BLOCKER...
> As of NETBEANS-1012 It was "just" CRITICAL two days ago. For me the issue
> describes a not that common use case. (Well of course it is really
> subjective.)
>
> I'm not really happy about that, in the last two week of the release cycle
> some dormant bugs just gets elevated as BLOCKER-s.
> If we really need to cut a vc4 on this weekend I'm happy to merge the PR
> for NETBEANS-1012. However I do not think we need that.
>
> Laszlo Kishalmi
> Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0
>
>
> On 11/7/18 7:45 AM, Christian Lenz wrote:
> > And this is the other blocker, which has not yet a PR:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-586
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> > Von: Geertjan Wielenga
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36
> > An: dev
> > Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
> >
> > Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the sources,
> > since we're still running the survey on the binary.
> >
> > But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be
> > replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin up
> > another voting candidate (which doesn't seem likely to me, right now,
> i.e.,
> > I think we have everything we want in vc3), is the one to use.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:03 PM Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga
> >> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> >> Apache
> >>> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
> >> I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?!
> >>
> >>> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at
> most
> >>> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries
> >> Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc
> >> archive alongside the binaries by actual release day.
> >>
> >> Best wishes,
> >>
> >> Neil
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>
>
AW: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>.
Yeah well, well again. I said only in my opinion, so I’m open to discuss it. The one with the tripple click, could be a Corner case, but it never happened before and I had the Situation, where the execption window came up which is annoying.
The NPE was in my opinion a blocker, to make it clear what there happens and it was still annyoing that an NPE came up, with the exception window, after using find usages. So this should not happen at all.
586 is the one with the NPE and 1012 is wrong, smth with javadoc, I think you mean 1440, Right?
My 2 cents.
Cheers
Chris
Von: Laszlo Kishalmi
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 17:48
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Well, well,
As of NETBEANS-586 it was created in April and suddenly after vc3 it became a BLOCKER...
As of NETBEANS-1012 It was "just" CRITICAL two days ago. For me the issue describes a not that common use case. (Well of course it is really subjective.)
I'm not really happy about that, in the last two week of the release cycle some dormant bugs just gets elevated as BLOCKER-s.
If we really need to cut a vc4 on this weekend I'm happy to merge the PR for NETBEANS-1012. However I do not think we need that.
Laszlo Kishalmi
Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0
On 11/7/18 7:45 AM, Christian Lenz wrote:
> And this is the other blocker, which has not yet a PR: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-586
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Von: Geertjan Wielenga
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36
> An: dev
> Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
>
> Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the sources,
> since we're still running the survey on the binary.
>
> But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be
> replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin up
> another voting candidate (which doesn't seem likely to me, right now, i.e.,
> I think we have everything we want in vc3), is the one to use.
>
> Gj
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:03 PM Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga
>> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
>> Apache
>>> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
>> I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?!
>>
>>> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
>>> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries
>> Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc
>> archive alongside the binaries by actual release day.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Neil
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>>
>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Laszlo Kishalmi <la...@gmail.com>.
Well, well,
As of NETBEANS-586 it was created in April and suddenly after vc3 it became a BLOCKER...
As of NETBEANS-1012 It was "just" CRITICAL two days ago. For me the issue describes a not that common use case. (Well of course it is really subjective.)
I'm not really happy about that, in the last two week of the release cycle some dormant bugs just gets elevated as BLOCKER-s.
If we really need to cut a vc4 on this weekend I'm happy to merge the PR for NETBEANS-1012. However I do not think we need that.
Laszlo Kishalmi
Volunteer Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 10.0
On 11/7/18 7:45 AM, Christian Lenz wrote:
> And this is the other blocker, which has not yet a PR: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-586
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Von: Geertjan Wielenga
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36
> An: dev
> Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
>
> Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the sources,
> since we're still running the survey on the binary.
>
> But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be
> replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin up
> another voting candidate (which doesn't seem likely to me, right now, i.e.,
> I think we have everything we want in vc3), is the one to use.
>
> Gj
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:03 PM Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga
>> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
>> Apache
>>> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
>> I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?!
>>
>>> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
>>> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries
>> Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc
>> archive alongside the binaries by actual release day.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Neil
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>>
>> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
AW: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Christian Lenz <ch...@gmx.net>.
And this is the other blocker, which has not yet a PR: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-586
Cheers
Chris
Von: Geertjan Wielenga
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2018 16:36
An: dev
Betreff: Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the sources,
since we're still running the survey on the binary.
But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be
replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin up
another voting candidate (which doesn't seem likely to me, right now, i.e.,
I think we have everything we want in vc3), is the one to use.
Gj
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:03 PM Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> Apache
> > NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
>
> I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?!
>
> > (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
> > the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries
>
> Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc
> archive alongside the binaries by actual release day.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com.INVALID>.
Sure, that's true, though in a way it's too early to vote on the sources,
since we're still running the survey on the binary.
But that thread, indeed, since it's there, and if it's not going to be
replaced by a new vote thread, because potentially we'll need to spin up
another voting candidate (which doesn't seem likely to me, right now, i.e.,
I think we have everything we want in vc3), is the one to use.
Gj
On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:03 PM Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga
> <ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent
> Apache
> > NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
>
> I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?!
>
> > (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
> > the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries
>
> Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc
> archive alongside the binaries by actual release day.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>
Re: Apache NetBeans 10 vc-3: looks solid
Posted by Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:09, Geertjan Wielenga
<ge...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> That means, unless we find actual real blockers that should prevent Apache
> NetBeans 10 from being released, we'll start voting on the sources
I'm confused! So the current 10-vc3 vote thread isn't a vote thread?!
> (remember, Apache does not release binaries, it releases sources, at most
> the binaries are known as 'convenience binaries
Speaking of which, we could do with having a convenience Javadoc
archive alongside the binaries by actual release day.
Best wishes,
Neil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists